Katie Mack Profile picture
Sep 14, 2020 15 tweets 9 min read Read on X
💥 Life on Venus? 😮

Quick thread with links to more info. First, the press release from @RoyalAstroSoc: ras.ac.uk/news-and-press…

Short version: a molecule was detected in the atmosphere of Venus that MIGHT have been produced by life. (It's unclear how else to produce it there.)
New York Times coverage by @shannonmstirone, @kchangnyt, & @overbye: nytimes.com/2020/09/14/sci…

"High in the toxic atmosphere of the planet Venus, astronomers on Earth have discovered signs of what might be life."
New Scientist coverage by @DownHereOnEarth: newscientist.com/article/225441…

"There are no known non-biological mechanisms of making the gas on Venus, so it may be being produced by alien microbes." [Paywalled article]
Axios coverage by @mirikramer: axios.com/scientists-fin…

"Why it matters: Scientists have been musing about the possibility that life exists in Venus' temperate clouds for decades. If confirmed as a sign of life, the finding would open up a new era of science."
Scientific American coverage by @adamspacemann: scientificamerican.com/article/venus-…

"Although toxic to many organisms, the molecule has been singled out as a potentially unambiguous signature of life because it is so difficult to make through ordinary geological or atmospheric action."
National Geographic coverage by @nadiamdrake: nationalgeographic.com/science/2020/0…

"the scientists who today announced sightings of this noxious gas in the Venusian atmosphere say it could be tantalizing—if controversial—evidence of life on the planet next door."
Science News coverage by @astrolisa: sciencenews.org/article/phosph…

"If the discovery holds up, and if no other explanations for the gas are found, then the hellish planet next door could be the first to yield signs of extraterrestrial life — though those are very big ifs."
Thread by @chrislintott with context and commentary on today's Venus announcement:
Thread by @aussiastronomer with context and commentary on today's Venus announcement:
A very brief summary of today's Venus announcement from @davecl42, one of the members of the discovery team:
Venus researchers are, as you might imagine, excited about this! Here’s a comment from @ThePlanetaryGuy:
Here’s a link to the press briefing on the possible Venus biosignature announcement from @RoyalAstroSoc featuring comment from several of the scientists involved, including @jgreaves6 and @ProfSaraSeager: #VenusNews
The Verge coverage by @lorengrush: theverge.com/21428796/venus…

"The gas’s presence isn’t enough to say for sure that Venus hosts life forms, but the fact that it exists in the planet’s clouds indicates that something is going on there that we don’t fully understand."
Here's a link to the technical paper in @NatureAstronomy nature.com/articles/s4155… (unpaywalled)

"The presence of PH3 is unexplained...could originate from unknown photochemistry or geochemistry, or, by analogy with biological production of PH3 on Earth, from the presence of life"
Planetary Society coverage by @CaseyDreier: planetary.org/articles/venus…

“This is the first announcement of a difficult detection that required significant modeling and data analysis… Independent scientific teams must now do the work to confirm this signal.”

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Katie Mack

Katie Mack Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @AstroKatie

Jun 29, 2023
The news is out! The @NANOGrav pulsar timing array collaboration has detected a background of cosmic gravitational waves rippling through our Universe! Let’s talk about it!
(Full press conference tomorrow, )
1/n https://t.co/5jd4mp989Wnanograv.org/news/2023Annou…
@NANOGrav Q: What does this mean?
A: Whenever violent gravitational events (like colliding black holes) happen in the cosmos, it causes ripples in space itself: gravitational waves. This is the 1st detection of a “stochastic background” of these waves, coming from all over the cosmos.
2/n
@NANOGrav Q: What are pulsars?
A: Pulsars are ultra-dense neutron stars (remnants of dead stars) that have jets of radiation coming from their poles & rotate rapidly. Typically the jet isn’t aligned with the pole, so it sweeps around. When it hits us, we get a pulse.
3/n
Read 17 tweets
Jun 18, 2023
Nothing exemplifies a complete failure to understand the point of science like demanding to settle a scientific issue through the medium of emotionally persuasive public shouting
We actually do a lot of arguing and debating within science! But — and this is pretty important context — we do it with knowledge and expertise already in hand, having read and understood the relevant literature, and for the purpose of improving the work. Not to win via applause.
Scientists don't do everything right & our methods aren't always unimpeachable.

But there's really not enough awareness that most of us spend a HUGE amount of our time trying desperately to find flaws in our own & each others' work. And we are very well equipped for this!
Read 4 tweets
Apr 1, 2023
We don’t call Trump a liar and criminal because we don’t like him. We don’t like him because he’s a liar who does lots of crimes.
He has explicitly bragged that his fans would happily excuse his crimes even if they were murders in the streets; let’s not pretend the righteous indignation and claims of innocence are genuine.
I don’t think the right wing seriously believes he’s not a criminal. I think they just understand that it’s more socially/politically acceptable to play-act outraged credulity than to admit they don’t care about rules or honesty as long as their guy is winning.
Read 4 tweets
Apr 1, 2023
I applied to Twitter for verification in 2016, when I had about 40k followers and was starting to have a voice in the online astronomy/physics community. The checkmark suddenly appeared shortly after a snarky tweet of mine went super viral and my following doubled in a week.
I don’t know how much of it has been due to going viral, or to my science, or just to how I tweet in general, and I don’t know how much verification helped, but I built up a wonderful little network of amazing people here whose work I admire and whose friendship I truly value.
Twitter has had its bad aspects for sure but for me, it’s been a doorway into a room full of my heroes, & a chance to listen to voices I might otherwise never encounter. I don’t know what it will be when so many people whose company I treasure find it no longer worth their time.
Read 4 tweets
Oct 31, 2022
The point of Twitter verification is that for certain individuals/organizations it’s useful to be able to verify their statements are coming from them. (This is why so many journalists/reporters are verified.) It’s supposed to help combat disinformation, not be a status symbol.
People think of it as a status thing because a lot of people with status are verified but the causality is that if you’re well known, you’re more likely to be a target for impersonation and/or there’s more public interest in being able to verify that your statements are yours.
(This is not to say that Twitter verification is always applied sensibly/fairly. It certainly isn’t. And the verification distribution system has been bad in many ways for a long time. But turning it into purely a vanity accessory for pay would in fact be worse.)
Read 4 tweets
Aug 31, 2022
This is an image of the Cosmic Microwave Background (CMB). It's a projection of the whole sky onto an oval, aligned such that the center of the image is in the direction of the center of our Galaxy, and the edges are the opposite direction. A wide oval with small specks of blue and orange scattered a
The CMB is often described as the afterglow of the Big Bang, but it's actually a DIRECT view of the Universe around us -- of parts so far away that the light has been travelling for about 13.8 billion years, so we see those regions as they were when the cosmos was STILL ON FIRE
In the early universe, all space was filled with hot dense plasma: space was aglow. Then, as time passed & the cosmos expanded, that plasma cooled & the gas became dark. So we see the bright plasma THROUGH the dark gas; the Cosmic Dark Ages are *closer* to us, backlit by the CMB
Read 7 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us!

:(