Thread to explore the use of the word "lodestar," noticed in Strzok book.
The word "lodestar" was used in the "Anonymous" article published by the New York Times. This provoked much analysis. (This thread is not to discuss politics.)…
Apparently the Vice President uses that word a lot.
Historical analysis. Is it something like the North Star?…
"By the early 16th century, the related term “Lodestone” was in common usage. A Lodestone is a naturally magnetic rock, which could thus serve as a kind of primitive compass.

A Lodestar is somewhat similar to a Loadstone:"
"in the late 16th century, 'Loadstar' is another name for Polaris, the North Star,' which sailors often a navigational guide...has since taken on the related positive denotation of something inspirational, something that guides you towards all things good."
Strzok: "our efforts still were guided by the same bright, unwavering lodestar."
Nobody I know has ever used this word. No book I've ever read, no article, no magazine - zero.

The article concludes: "So remember, folks, use your words, especially if no one else is using them!"…
But words are a symbol of culture. For example, Jewish people of a certain age will say that someone is a "shmuck."
So in whose world is the "lodestar" a thing? (Jewish people don't talk about a "North Star" either...we don't worship the stars.)
Lockheed C-60A "Lodestar"
9,096 views•Jul 6, 2013

Interesting art on the front of it ("Goodtime Gal").
"Rick Perry’s Lodestar State"

WSJ, June 4, 2015…
"the Ryan budget, which continues to function as the party’s ideological lodestar"

WaPo, 6/6/16…
Lodestar seems to mean a centering point as versus a North Star is a point you work toward.
So when Strzok says, "Things were getting complicated quickly, but our efforts still were guided by the same bright, unwavering lodestar" --

he isn't talking about an END goal but rather a PROCESS goal (we all agree that this piece of info is important)
If nothing else this suggests a mindset that is different from what the average person might hold.

You and I might want to solve the problem ("North Star") - e.g. end poverty.

Here the goal was to find the individual presumed to have taken an action ("Lodestar").
If we all agree that this piece of info is important - if it is the centering piece of our investigation - then the conclusion of the investigation is presumed as well.

So it's not an objective process.
The CRS (Congressional Research Service) uses the word "lodestar" this way in a 2008 report, "Awards of Attorneys’ Fees by Federal Courts and Federal Agencies"…
The report discusses the "lodestar" method of "calculating 'reasonable' attorney's fees." The "lodestar" is a kind of average figure that everyone can agree on based on common sense.
If the question of Russian interference as prescribed by a dominant narrative was a matter of consensus and common sense, then there was no opportunity for what the noted organizational theorist Chris Argyris called "double-loop learning" - no way to question the "facts."
An investigation is supposed to constantly question the facts though. At any point, new information may come in that fundamentally alters all the "known knowns" that came before.
So "lodestar" versus "North Star" is a very revealing term when used in a book about conducting an investigation.
The word "lodestar" is also used by the Washington Post with reference to Hillary Clinton as a 2016 presidential candidate. The point of the term is to emphasize that a woman should be president regardless of who she is.…
"The potential to become America’s first female president is a lodestar for Clinton’s campaign, and the soon-to-be candidate has strongly suggested that she will stress her path-breaking role."
Words are very revealing. If you use a word like "lodestar" as opposed to a word like "North Star" (as much as I dislike this term) to make your point, you're saying that the logic of your argument is consensus - not good content.
I know from my short time as a brand consultant that you can't make good decisions by committee.
We should go back to being a country that debates ideas on their merits.

Thank you @SaRaAshcraft for highlighting this interesting word.
@threader_app compile

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh

Keep Current with Dannielle (Dossy) Blumenthal PhD

Dannielle (Dossy) Blumenthal PhD Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!


Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @DrDannielle

24 Sep
This is a short dig on Linda Sarsour.
Photo via Wikipedia.… Image
From Wikipedia: "Linda Sarsour (born 1980)[1] is an American political activist. She was co-chair of the 2017 Women's March, the 2017 Day Without a Woman, and the 2019 Women's March. She is also a former executive director of the Arab American Association of New York."
"She and her Women's March co-chairs were profiled in Time magazine's "100 Most Influential People" in 2017. Sarsour is a Muslim of Palestinian descent."
Read 37 tweets
21 Sep
Mystical thread on the Jewish New Year, 5781
Rosh HaShanah is the "head of the year." We mark Jewish holidays with a celebration because when we show up and engage, we rectify the past. There is no such thing as time, only correction.
"Rabbi Netanel ben Yeshaya, one of the great rabbis of Yemenite Jewry, who lived about 600 years ago...wrote in his book called From the Light of Darkness...about events occurring in the year that ends 5780, and about the year that begins in 5781." (NOW)
Read 32 tweets
21 Sep
Hello. I am online. #RBG was very frail when I saw her in this photo. Even if she medically "died" on September 18, I do not believe she was really judging anything.
It's the same problem with #Biden. He clearly has dementia as this Anon alleges. That should rule him out of a presidential run. His handlers don't care.
Remember I asked about this at the time. They were helping her along every step. Biden doesn't write his tweets and I don't believe she was writing any opinions (which would invalidate them).
Read 12 tweets
18 Sep
Responding to @JacksonLeeTx18, @FBI Director Christopher Wray states that QAnon, although associated with some acts of violence (non-lethal), is viewed not as a terrorist organization but rather as a "complex set of conspiracy theories." @CSPAN…
Wray explains that the @FBI opens investigations based on:
1) Violence or the threat of
2) Federal crime
3) Motivation

It is therefore inaccurate to state that the FBI has labeled QAnon a "terrorist organization."

#factsmatter #fakenews
Further, since people use all kinds of excuses to commit acts of violence, it is unfair to censor the Q hashtag as particularly dangerous, especially in light of the disparate treatment provided to Antifa, an actual domestic terror organization.…
Read 4 tweets
17 Sep
Darren Beattie, Tucker Carlson
- Engineered contested election scenario +
- Massive mobilized protests ("peaceful protests") and acts of civil disobedience
- Same "color revolution professionals," same "playbook"
"Norm Eisen is a key legal hatchet man, Democrat operative, former Obama ethics czar, believe it or not. He is also a key architect of nearly every effort to censor, sue, impeach, and overthrow the President."
"He is the author of a color revolution playbook literally called the 'playbook'. And one of the items he calls engineering election fraud scenarios, using election fraud to engineer mass protests to question the legitimacy of the target leader."
Read 55 tweets
17 Sep
9/16/2020 Notes from the war
I'm on the phone with a woman who tells me she was hassled on the train on the way to work.
She goes to work early, and because of Covid there is nobody on the train. Also because of Covid they have let the prisoners out of prison. This means the prisoners are on the train...alone with her.
Read 39 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!

This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!