“Overall, the focus of my organization – and most of Facebook – was on large-scale problems, an approach which fixated us on spam,” she said. “The civic aspect was discounted because of its small volume, its disproportionate impact ignored.”
THIS 🖕
The memo (excerpts) read like an employee well aware of the dangers and trying to work as hard as possible to hold back the tide -- but being chronically de-prioritized for years.
This is why I quit Facebook: They clearly DO NOT PRIORITIZE democracy. It's not that they cannot deal with the obvious inauthentic behavior on their platform -- or even that the front line workers aren't working themselves to death trying to stop it -- it's that executives have
...decided to prioritize PR over democracy. One has to ask, if there were no PR issues, would they do ... anything? Anything at all? Or is it completely up to voters to figure out (without Facebook's internal analytics) which of the thousands of accounts posting things...
...about an election are paid / fake / inauthentic? Is their core attitude "use at your own risk" for what is -- let's be honest -- an absolutely core communication medium over the whole world?
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
@thomasafine@anaphoristand@GGovic@z3dster@ScottMStedman@charleskriel In March 2017 we get this report, which says "the investigation continues", but now we know the FBI dropped the investigation right about then. It suggests that Dyn confirmed the DNS lookups weren't faked data, though I can't confirm that Dyn statement.
It looks like Peters, an election official, was radicalized and recruited by Lindell’s loose band of “election integrity” con artists. If so, that seems similar to other problems of radicalization of insiders. How can we combat this?
We should all be worried. Especially with staff leaving their positions for their own safety. Who is replacing them?
Hi @SenFeinstein! I wanted to call to share my views about your literal embrace of Lindsay Graham yesterday. It seems that a lot of other people have things to say, too — voicemail is full in every one of your local offices and your DC office line is continuously busy.
So I’m going to just share them here in public. Buckle up.
This was the most tone-deaf, poorly timed, badly thought out gesture ever. It’s convinced me that we need new leadership on Judiciary. I also believe that you should retire and make room for a newly appointed Senator
...who will fight for constituents and be in sync with the party when the chips are down and a key election is on the line. I realize you are not up for re election this year or next time around, but Lindsey _is_ — and we have a real shot at winning his seat.
@bitchy_meats "Respiratory droplets" is what's known as a "term of art", meaning, it has implications that go beyond what we normal folk would think. It has a 100 year history in public health, and if you say "respiratory droplets" public health officials hear "not spread through air".
@bitchy_meats By which they mean, not spread by air currents, not hanging in the air for long periods of time, but in the form of droplets that quickly (a few seconds) fall to the ground, unless you're REALLY unlucky and get sneezed on.
@bitchy_meats The new guidance made it clear that being sneezed on, or picking up droplets from surfaces after they fall, isn't the current major mode of transmission. It's most likely from breathing in significant quantities of aerosolized (floating) tiny droplets < 100um.
In the face of official deceit, telling the truth is a revolutionary act. The CDC published, then pulled, guidance that the coronavirus commonly spreads via aerosols. (Which is absolutely supported by the science.)
Left: Friday's update
Right: Today's coverup
Friday's change was hailed among researchers as a major step forward in figuring out _effective responses_ to the pandemic.
Monday's cover-up is, therefore, a major step backwards. It's unconscionable. It's dangerous. And it's going to get (more) people killed.
Here's the web page in question. Sadly, web.archive.org didn't scrape the Friday update (somebody really needs to crank up the scrape rate for CDC sites to 2x/day).