The US Church is filled with shock jocks who have no other work that adds any value to anything other than promoting their own private self-made brand and seeking clout and grifting their shock jock wares as if they were serious artistic, intellectual, or cultural products.
These shock jock folks also insulate themselves from criticism under the guises of a certain moral and ideological purity. They are accountable to no but each other and these shock jock rivalries often create their own range or spectrum of grifting personas to choose from.
I call them shock jocks because they really are just the Howards Sterns and Rush Limbaughs of US Catholicism or the Dr. Laura, and so on. Whatever small drop of credibility they have, they inflate and spend well beyond its real currency and excel in provocation sold as analysis.
These are different types and kinds here and some have more or less credibility but the main point I want to highlight here is that these shock jocks are junk food, they offer easy comfort but no nutrition and will cause great harm over time if they are the only diet.
These grifting shock jocks often use rigorist-sounding rhetoric, facts and logic and Latin, and make their audiences think they are eating red wine and meat when, in fact, they are feeding on Captain Crunch and Mountain Dew and the results show, the fruits are anemic and weak.
The saddest thing to me is when otherwise good and decent and well intended Catholics treat the shock jocks or aspiring shock jocks as if they had redeeming, value-added qualities. Jordan Peterson was a hard test case which many failed but by their fruits ye shall know them.
And by the way, there are numerous good, smart, holy, and hard working people who are working in the vineyard who refuse this shock jock game. My own father did it for over 40 years as an evangelist. The shock jock celebrity insults, often directly, the apostolates of so many.
Part of the selling point of the shock jock is to distinguish themselves totally or on a very limited number of alliances. This keeps the pool small but the only way to do that is through dismissal and willful ignorance. It is all about funnelling attention and $ onto themselves.
One of the most odd defences shock jocks use against me is that I am envious of them, is that I am just another one of them, seeking my own portion of the pie. This has some ring to it, but I am ready to present all my receipts to show how different my public work is to theirs.
I do think many scholars are wise to not address a public or to allow that address to happen indirectly and through osmosis. But that has never been my approach. It is too alienating for me to work that way.
I do think there are some cases where people have different faces they wear for different kinds of work. I surely know how to code switch depending on my audience and the form of my work I am presenting, so this can be complex in some cases, but not all cases.
I should also clarify that there is a difference between a shock jock and a person who has a wild temperament, prone to excess, who is otherwise producing works. The shock jock is not a tortured artist or a diva. They have no or very few redeeming qualities.
On further thought, I should have said "filled"; this exaggerates and ultimately misrepresents that these shock jocks are an extreme minority with outsized influence due to the amplification of the internet.
*should not.

Forgive this and the other typos and stupidities.

Thanks for reading and sharing.

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh

Keep Current with Sam Rocha

Sam Rocha Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!


Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @SamRochadotcom

1 Jul
I’d like to share some of what I learned in my bout with the alt right last night. I would like to avoid glamourizing it with too much screenshot evidence. I may also use direct quotes so if strongly offensive, foul, and vulgar language is bad for you, please do not read this.
I have insisted and will continue to insist that the issue at hand is better discussed as white supremacy, not racism. More specifically, anti-Black white supremacy. Some object saying that this language is too strong. I disagree in principle and also in practice because...
...along with the various white supremacist organizations we know of like the KKK, there are many others who dwell in the alt-right internet zone of lost boys with anonymous accounts, speaking in their own jargon and attacking anti racists.
Read 40 tweets
27 Jun
In the past few years, US Catholic conservative cancel culture has cancelled or suspended Simcha Fisher, Mark Shea, Rebecca Bratten Weiss, Stephen Lewis, and now Gloria Purvis. Numerous others have been targeted with cancelation threats of different degrees as well. This is real.
The reasons are complex in some ways and the specifics of each are slightly different, but the ideological picture this paints is the post-Trump reality we are living in and we must see it on those basic terms to understand and oppose it.
There is the media apparatus of Church Militant and Lifesite in open war and then the complicit cooperatives of EWTN and other mainstream entities, then there are the start up wackos like Marshall and Gordon, and the undecided false neutrality of Fradd and other podcasters.
Read 43 tweets
24 Oct 18

I get asked for writing tips a lot. Of all the ones I’ve given, here are a few of the ones that seem to hold true and remain somewhat universal or at least mostly unobjectionable:

#amwriting #writingtips
1. If you are a fast writer (i.e., if you compose first drafts very quickly) then you absolutely must become a slow editor. Much of what I call “writing” is really, for me, editing.
2. If you don’t read you cannot write a lot or well. Sure, maybe you can read like a maniac for a decade and then read less after that, but without some large volume of intake, there will never be a meaningful output.
Read 19 tweets
15 May 18

After my review of @jordanbpeterson’s *12 Rules for Life* (…), here are “Sam’s 12 rules for Dealing with Jordan Peterson’s Two Books and Tons of Videos + His Fans and Defenders.”
Rule #1: Dominance Hierarchies Dominate, Hierarchically ( OF COURSE!), But They Don’t Really Know How to Make Upright Arguments or Provide Broad-Shouldered Reasons or Offer Serious Examples That Don’t Involve Psychologizing Crustaceans
Rule #2: “Postmodern Neo Marxists” Refers to Lacan But Not Jung, To Derrida But Not Nietzsche, To Foucault But Not Freud, But Please Don’t Ask Peterson About Terry Eagleton, Slavoj Zizek, Alain Badiou, Or Anyone Else Alive Today Who Is This Thing He Repeats Over And Over
Read 13 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!

This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!