Peter Strzok, in his book, writes that while he would love to discuss his August 2016 London interviews, he can’t because those 302s have not been released.
3\
We also lack the transcript of the FBI’s initial interview of George Papadopoulos (his interview was recorded, not the norm for the FBI)
4\
I suspect that both the Downer/Thompson 302s and the PapaD transcript confirm that the meeting between PapaD and Thompson was initiated by Christrian Cantor, an Israeli embassy official.
5\
While we don’t have PapaD’s transcript, in his book PapaD writes that it was Cantor who reached out to him about meeting Thompson.
6\
It was on May 6th that PapaD allegedly told Thompson that the “Trump Campaign had received indications from the Russian government that it could assist the Campaign through the anonymous release of the information that would be damaging to Hillary Clinton.”
7\
PapaD met with Downer on May 10th.
I believe that Downer told Strzok what he told a television interviewer: PapaD started ‘blabbering’ about the Russians having “dirt,” unprompted.
8\
Additionally, I suspect Downer claimed the Australians did not initially reach out to PapaD to meet; it was Christian Cantor who reached out to them to set up a meeting.
9\
If you believe the “Push/Pull” theory (Mifsud pushed information about the Russians having “dirt” on HRC into PapaD and Downer pulled it out), then you would have to believe the Israelis are involved as well.
10\
Because PapaD repeatedly writes in his book that Cantor set up the meeting between him and Thompson.
11\
PapaD claims a “high-profile reporter based in Washington” told him that Thompson and Cantor were intelligence officers.
12\
According to PapaD, Cantor was one of the people “vetting” him.
13\
On twitter, PapaD has also stated that Cantor introduced him to Thompson, and even seems to suggest Cantor was there for the May 6th meeting.
14\
Some of his tweets come off as vaguely threatening.
15\
PapaD has gone so far as to implore President Trump to ask Israeli PM Netanyahu about Cantor.
16\
He claims that Downer said the Israelis told him to spy on PapaD.
I have never found where Downer has stated such a thing.
17\
Also, we have Maria Bartiromo’s timeline which states that Downer said the Israelis sent PapaD? Did PapaD tell her staff that? 🤷♂️
18\
I’m not sure what Cantor’s role was in Spygate, but I’m confident his name is in the Downer/Thompson 302s and the PapaD transcript.
19\
Did Strozk interview Cantor as well? If not, why not?
20\
There could be conflicting claims between officials of two of American’s closest allies and both their versions could be different than PapaD’s.
21\
Then there is the problem of Strzok as the author of the 302s. Can we trust him? How accurate was his interpretation of what Downer said in his interview?
It’s a mess. I don’t expect a declassification on the documents in questions. It’s not worth the potential embarrassment for the parties involved.
23\
I have seen it suggested that declass could be held up because of Durham’s investigation. I'll be pleasantly surprised if that's the case. Otherwise, I'm not anticipating seeing Downer's 302 anytime soon.
END\
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
On a luxurious yacht in the Red Sea in 2015, George Nader mingled with Gulf and Middle Eastern elite, from the crown princes of the UAE and Saudi Arabia to the kings of Bahrain and Jordan and Egypt's president.
/3
The discussion on the yacht centered on creating a new, more aggressive joint organization to counter the increasing influence of Iran and Turkey in the region. Nader agreed to take on a mission to secretly influence the next U.S. president to support their aims.
THE TROUBLING CASE OF GEORGE NADER: THE CONVICTED PEDOPHILE WHO MOVED IN POWERFUL CIRCLES
PART I
/2
Objectivity is disregarded by many journalists today. News coverage of individuals is shaped by partisan narratives. If someone does not fit a desired narrative, their story receives little attention, regardless of significance.
/3
Thus, the story of George Nader has largely faded from public attention, despite his long history of involvement in high-stakes diplomatic affairs.
I've compiled the available information, and here's his story. No holds barred.
A deep dive into the sordid world of yachting--rich elites, glamorous models, lavish vessels, and political intrigue.
Batten down the hatches 🧵
🛥️ 🍾 💰 💃 🚨 🔞
2/
When you hear the word “yachting,” perhaps you imagine leisurely sailing off the coast of California while listening to the soothing sounds of Loggins and Messina.
3/
That is definitely NOT the type of yachting we’ll be discussing in this thread.
The most succinct definition of “yachting” I’ve come across is this one.
2. Part II of this series is over 4 years old. I gave up on the series when the reality that we'll never "get to the bottom" of Russiagate drained all my motivation.
3. There is too much Republican involvement in the origins of Russiagate that I'm not sure even Donald Trump himself wants to reveal the entire truth. At this point, why would it benefit him to expose any possible Republican role in pushing the hoax?
The genesis of this thread is an email I came across from a doc dump from the Clinton Library. It's been out there for nearly 10 years, but I've never seen it before. It sent me down a rabbit hole where I encountered a recurring cast of characters in DC scandals.
Read carefully
Starting with the creator of the email, Sidney Blumenthal. Blumenthal may be less famous than his son, Max, these days, but he's a prominent figure in Clinton circles. His official title was "Assistant to the President" when he was brought into the White House in 1997.
Leo Strauss, the academic godfather of the neocons, was a big fan of the TV show Gunsmoke because it showed the conflict between good and evil in a way that would be immediately intelligible to everyone. Sheriff Matt Dillon wore the white hat; the bad guy wore the black hat.
Strauss believed that societies needed powerful myths and stories, like the hero defeating bad guys on Gunsmoke, to inspire people and give them a sense of moral clarity.
Yes, if you want society to act, it's a powerful way to move people.