Coerced sterilization is a crime against humanity.
People are not nearly as outraged by the abhorrent and grotesquely evil practice of inmate sterilization as you might expect. Ask me how I know.…
Also, to be clear, “crime against humanity” is not a turn of phrase here. Enforced sterilization is an actual, specific, and literal crime against humanity.…
This practice is not new. It also is not old. It is thankfully rare, but not as rare as you’d think. It is definitely here, sometimes adopted formally, sometimes not:…
It is a practice that is too frequently defended, sometimes in whispers, sometimes in open argument before the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit:…
Civil rights lawyers have been fighting tirelessly against government-sponsored sterilization in this country for an actual century, perhaps longer. Here’s one of them (Fred Gray, Tuskegee, AL):
This is what the end of a government sterilization program looks like. It is at once tremendous and tremendously insufficient.
Greetings, you goddamn fucking fool. This thread is, to the contrary, a product of this Jew’s RAGE about government-sponsored sterilization, which I have some experience with because I ended such a program in my state and gave half the award to the Holocaust Memorial Museum.
A few US jurisdictions have voluntarily paid reparations for their sterilization programs:…. Many people who were sterilized are still alive.
A government official who sterilizes someone can (probably) still get qualified immunity for doing so based on the insane and never-formally-overruled jurisprudence that blessed the practice for a terrifying amount of time.…
Lots—LOTS—of *current* US government officials think sterilization is an appropriate punishment for criminal offenses. They rarely get pushback, but sometimes, they do.…
Caselaw remains well behind modern norms. E.g.—this is what qualifies as a “good” opinion on sterilization:… The holding: “such a serious and far reaching act should not be required by the court without a specific statutory or constitutional authorization.”
It would be nice if we developed sufficient consensus that this is an evil practice that we banned it by statute everywhere:…
Until then, outrage is essential. Otherwise, we’ll be stuck with constant efforts to return to the dark ages, because in so many ways, we’re still there and have barely evolved. /End…

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh

Keep Current with Daniel A. Horwitz

Daniel A. Horwitz Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!


Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @Scot_Blog

25 Sep
If you enjoy being ragey about standards of review, boy do I have an opinion for you:…
This order is a good lesson on why sloppy U.S. Supreme Court opinions create chaos. There are like eight potential different standards of review involved here, says Judge Richardson.
Read 6 tweets
23 Sep
I was very skeptical of this series when I first heard about it and directed the author to @ENBrown. Hope they reached out.…
Here’s @NSHBIZSichko’s first piece. It is not a good start. This gives every appearance of being a set up for exactly the same sensationalized nonsense that has resulted in countless other “stunning reports” of human trafficking in America turning out to be fraudulent.
For instance: Come the fuck on. This is indistinguishable from TBI propaganda. ImageImage
Read 13 tweets
21 Sep
This is an excellent proposal, so of course, it’s not going to happen.…
Court packing is plainly bad (but legal). Though I honestly am not sure how much worse it is than flagrantly lying about something like this as the Chairman of the Senate Judiciary Committee, which is also plainly bad (and also legal).
Sorry. The current Chairman of the Senate Judiciary Committee. I’m not sure if he made any of these statements *while* he was Chairman. Obviously it’s egregiously dishonest either way, and people are not unreasonable for believing that he should be held to his word.
Read 5 tweets
19 Sep
#BREAKING: @TomiLahren’s apology to @JohnCooper4Nash for shamelessly promoting a fake scandal based on a retracted story that was the subject of an on-air apology last night is not, in fact, in the mail.

[the entire story upon which her outrage is based is retracted]

@TomiLahren: “SO WHAT I’M STILL MAD HELP ME STAND UP” ImageImageImage
Truly, @TomiLahren is the most obvious satire since @DevinCow.
Read 5 tweets
19 Sep
Ruth Bader Ginsburg would still have been in the legal hall of fame if she had retired before becoming a judge. She was legendary in every way.
As an example: It was largely Ruth Bader Ginsburg’s work as a public interest lawyer—not as a judge or Justice—that enabled this result last year:…. Her work built the doctrines under which relief could be obtained.
Read 4 tweets
19 Sep
This was the most easily debunked fake conspiracy since QAnon, and some of you are At Large Council Members who should be ashamed to show your face in public for the rest of the year.
I know a lot of shameless people, but I cannot even conceive of the idea that someone is capable of being as shameless as @TomiLahren has been during these past 48 hours.
Read 4 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!

This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!