General thought about susceptibility to "child sex trafficking" theme: I recall in 'free range kids' discussions 5 or 10 years ago being stunned how many Americans thought kids were nabbed off the street every day
If I wanted to start a CT, sure would have been attractive 1/
A bit abstract since I"m not a parent myself, but before pizzagate or Q, there was talk about abductions, and I'd see people say they had relatives or neighbors who figured a kid left alone in a front yard for an hour had a good chance of being kidnapped 2/
Or ancedotes about being scared to let a child even go to the mailbox and back.
When you think about it, that's absurd, like there were massive fleets of pedo-abduction vans circling every suburban subdivision 3/
But from what I kept hearing, this was a real fear of a surprisingly large number of American middle-class parents. Again, long before pizza/Q existed, really even before mass Facebook etc use among that age group 4/
At a minimum, that seems like a strong pre-existing if unfocussed and not initially politicized fear for Q type conspiracies to evolve out of 5/
And if I were *trying* to start a politicized mass conspiracy theory, then wow, "child abduction fears" would seem like a good strategic hook for me to start with. 6/6
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
After I RTd yesterday, a few people asked why China doesn't launch from their coastline vs from an interior populated area? A thread! tl;dr: national security initially, now also sunk costs and not giving a damn 1/
An ideal launch site is near the equator and has wide open ocean to the east (most efficient given Earth's rotation) and either north and south for polar launches. Florida fits the bill nicely for the US! 2/
Some countries don't have good options. Israel launches west over the Med (safety & security over efficiency). USSR's Pacific coast was remote and rugged so they built an Arctic site and a Central Asian site that's virtually unpopulated downrange 3/
This 2002 RAND study has the best quantitative analysis I've seen. Notably, they conclude conventional penetrators are often *better* than hypervelocity impactors against deeply buried targets.
The kinetic impactors lose energy *too* quickly, very rapidly ablating and vaporizing when they enter the rock or soil surface.
I don't know where advocates get their "destroy bunkers hundreds of feet deep" as published studies just don't support that
More or less, RAND saw some potential value in pre-positioning conventional strike weapons in orbit, i.e., with aerodynamic maneuvering and explosives, and very few scenarios where true kinetic impactors would make any sense.
Last 747 ever to be made. 50 years is quite a run for an airplane but it's sad to see them fading out -- beautiful lines vs the generic twinjet (and we shall not speak of the lumpy 380).
Yeah, I know "it was satire", but I was familiar with the eXile at the time and a core theme for years was how Western women are fat-ankled pantsuit wearing feminazis, while Russian girls were thankfully skinny and economically desperate sluts. What, exactly, was the satire?
I dont doubt a lot of specific extreme stories were just stories, but that's just a *lot* of effort, and a great job of never breaking character, to... what, spend years satirizing that some dudes thought exactly that about the advantages of getting laid in Moscow?
They did do some gonzo journalism, and didn't sugarcoat things the way some other expat English-language mags did. And god knows there was plenty to skewer about Russian politics or how US government, business, and mainstream journalists dealt with Russia. 3/
Comparison of the Apollo capsule and service module to the new Orion spacecraft.
The Apollo SPS engine was, as it looks, more powerful -- 21,000lb vs 6,000lb, but the Apollo engine was overdesigned
Overdesigned as in, from an early mission concept where the CSM stack would land and then take off from the moon, before the LOR with separate landing craft was chosen.
Other notes:
Apollo got its electricity from Oxygen / Hydrogen fuel cells, vs solar panels for Orion. That reduces weight and size, though the crew still needs O2 and water, so it can't eliminate *all* the Apollo fuel cell system weight
I do see some people argue the deaths were simply faked, "liberal" coroners and state vital stats agencies and federal CDC / Census all together massively fabricating death certs and other numbers
Perhaps a more serious attempt is to claim those excess deaths were the result of "lockdowns": a ginormous epidemic of suicides plus people unable to get their treatments for cancer, diabetes, etc., and mostly not COVID