"Definitions were changed and data ‘cooked'" - 10/27/2016

The CDC is being influenced by corporate and political interests thehill.com/blogs/pundits-…
The CDC is a collection of people. That is all.
Why did it take the CDC 3 months to start separating out deaths from Covid from deaths from flu & pneumonia?
How is it objective and authoritative to inflate the death numbers?
Is it important to the CDC that nursing homes account for 4 in 10 Covid deaths? forbes.com/sites/jemimamc…
Is it important to the CDC that the known widely effective drug hydrochloroquine was restricted by various means, including pharmacy boards and social pressure against it - no doubt pushing up the death count?
What month and year did the "resistance account" Alternative CDC open up on Twitter? January 2017?
How about "Alternative HHS," comprised of "angry/concerned scientists"? Also when @POTUS was inaugurated?
2/9/2017 on Twitter I attacked the "alt" Federal accounts for being seditious. Look at these wild responses. "He is an enemy of the state," they said.
Here's more.
I don't have the original Tweet. I wiped my Twitter account at some point when I first started writing about Pizzagate.
I do remember counting 127 alt Gov accounts. That means a government wide revolt.

@JamesOKeefeIII @Project_Veritas documented this.

The Washington Post itself reported on the impeachment effort which started on day 1.

The CDC has been embroiled in resisting the Administration from the get go. They aren't objective at all. Remember the "7 banned words"? Those are VALUE LADEN.

In fact, the CDC goes fully against science by embracing "critical race theory" -- which defines reality as a social construct.

Further, if the CDC is openly ignoring the President's call to stop using critical race theory at work (for training), doesn't it go without saying that they'll ignore and attack him on their core mission?

The politicized CDC -- under the guise of "help" -- ignores the distinction between what they're supposed to be doing (medical science best) and what they're not (public health policy). Outside their swim lane.

Under Obama, government scientists were really muzzled: "Obama Science Policy Legitimizes 'Minders,' PIO Interview Permissions,"

January 12, 2011
"A White House science policy issued December 17, 2010, allows agencies to require press office permission before a journalist can talk to a scientist and to require Saddam-style 'minders' to supervise the scientist while s/he is giving an interview."
I do recall Obama appointees at multiple agencies reviewing work products before they went out to the public, at USAID and NIST.
I remember one time that this caused a clash between an appointee and a civil servant. This is not an unusual phenomenon, either; each side always thinks it knows best.
Politico knows this and we all know the CDC is anti Trump and his the data on Covid stand-alone morbidity. So it's unfair and distorted to attack a Trump appointee for doing his job.

Further, initiatives/accords/agreements make great slush funds

Right, Joe?
In the end, the CDC cannot have it both ways.

They can't say on the one hand that science is independent, and on the other that it is basically a social production, like every other element of reality.

A VERY strange position for scientists to take.
What does the CDC say about God?
An unborn child is not a "fetus."

It is life.
@threader_app compile

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh

Keep Current with Dannielle (Dossy) Blumenthal PhD

Dannielle (Dossy) Blumenthal PhD Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!


Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @DrDannielle

24 Sep
This is a short dig on Linda Sarsour.
Photo via Wikipedia. en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Linda_Sar… Image
From Wikipedia: "Linda Sarsour (born 1980)[1] is an American political activist. She was co-chair of the 2017 Women's March, the 2017 Day Without a Woman, and the 2019 Women's March. She is also a former executive director of the Arab American Association of New York."
"She and her Women's March co-chairs were profiled in Time magazine's "100 Most Influential People" in 2017. Sarsour is a Muslim of Palestinian descent."
Read 37 tweets
21 Sep
Mystical thread on the Jewish New Year, 5781
Rosh HaShanah is the "head of the year." We mark Jewish holidays with a celebration because when we show up and engage, we rectify the past. There is no such thing as time, only correction.
"Rabbi Netanel ben Yeshaya, one of the great rabbis of Yemenite Jewry, who lived about 600 years ago...wrote in his book called From the Light of Darkness...about events occurring in the year that ends 5780, and about the year that begins in 5781." (NOW)
Read 32 tweets
21 Sep
Hello. I am online. #RBG was very frail when I saw her in this photo. Even if she medically "died" on September 18, I do not believe she was really judging anything.
It's the same problem with #Biden. He clearly has dementia as this Anon alleges. That should rule him out of a presidential run. His handlers don't care.
Remember I asked about this at the time. They were helping her along every step. Biden doesn't write his tweets and I don't believe she was writing any opinions (which would invalidate them).
Read 12 tweets
18 Sep
Responding to @JacksonLeeTx18, @FBI Director Christopher Wray states that QAnon, although associated with some acts of violence (non-lethal), is viewed not as a terrorist organization but rather as a "complex set of conspiracy theories." @CSPAN c-span.org/video/?c490740…
Wray explains that the @FBI opens investigations based on:
1) Violence or the threat of
2) Federal crime
3) Motivation

It is therefore inaccurate to state that the FBI has labeled QAnon a "terrorist organization."

#factsmatter #fakenews
Further, since people use all kinds of excuses to commit acts of violence, it is unfair to censor the Q hashtag as particularly dangerous, especially in light of the disparate treatment provided to Antifa, an actual domestic terror organization. bbc.com/news/world-us-…
Read 4 tweets
17 Sep
Darren Beattie, Tucker Carlson
- Engineered contested election scenario +
- Massive mobilized protests ("peaceful protests") and acts of civil disobedience
- Same "color revolution professionals," same "playbook"
"Norm Eisen is a key legal hatchet man, Democrat operative, former Obama ethics czar, believe it or not. He is also a key architect of nearly every effort to censor, sue, impeach, and overthrow the President."
"He is the author of a color revolution playbook literally called the 'playbook'. And one of the items he calls for...is engineering election fraud scenarios, using election fraud to engineer mass protests to question the legitimacy of the target leader."
Read 55 tweets
17 Sep
9/16/2020 Notes from the war
I'm on the phone with a woman who tells me she was hassled on the train on the way to work.
She goes to work early, and because of Covid there is nobody on the train. Also because of Covid they have let the prisoners out of prison. This means the prisoners are on the train...alone with her.
Read 39 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!

This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!