Michael Pettis Profile picture
Sep 15, 2020 11 tweets 3 min read Read on X
1/11
While many analysts see the most recent NBS data release – with retail sales showing the first monthly year-on-year increase in 2020 and industrial production up 5.6% year on year in August – as evidence of a “solid” economic recovery in China, this graph shows just how...
2/11
lop-sided and vulnerable this recovery has been. Before 2020, retail sales – which is a proxy for consumption, although it includes other things – had grown slightly faster than industrial production, suggesting a slow rebalancing in an economy that urgently needed to...
3/11
rebalance, but in 2020 that relationship has completely reversed, with industrial production growing so much faster than retail sales that it threatens to derail the last few years of limited rebalancing.

If the production side of the economy were the constraint in...
4/11
China’s economic growth, as it had been in the 1980s and 1990s, then it would be legitimate to conclude anyway that China had recovered. But even Beijing has publicly admitted for over a decade that the real constraint is the demand side of the economy, specifically...
5/11
domestic consumption and the private sector investment driven by domestic consumption.

Not only have these barely recovered, but what many analysts are missing is that even this limited recovery has been driven by Beijing’s substantial boosting of the production side of...
6/11
the economy. By expanding public sector investment in logistics and infrastructure, underwriting an expansion of credit to businesses, and otherwise subsidizing production, Beijing has bolstered production to create the employment that has indirectly boosted consumption...
7/11
Put differently, economic recovery in China (and the world, more generally) requires a recovery in demand that pulls along with it a recovery in supply. But that isn’t what is happening. Instead Beijing is pushing hard on the supply side (mainly...
8/11
because it wants to lower unemployment as quickly as possible) in order to pull demand along with it. The problem with this strategy, as I have been writing since May, is that either it is resolved by a rapid increase in China’s trade surplus, which weakens the...
9/11
recovery abroad and forces an increase in foreign debt burdens, or it is resolved by faster growth in Chinese public-sector investment, which, because most of it is no longer productive, increases the Chinese debt burden. And this is exactly what we have been...
10/11
seeing in the data.

China’s “recovery”, in other words, is simply an exacerbation of the problems that have long been recognized. It isn’t sustainable, and unless Beijing moves quickly to redistribute domestic income, as I explain below, it will...
carnegieendowment.org/chinafinancial…
11/11
either require slower growth abroad or an eventual reversal of domestic growth once Chinese debt can no longer rise fast enough to hide the domestic demand problem.

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Michael Pettis

Michael Pettis Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @michaelxpettis

Jan 7
1/6
People often say that the problem with the global trading system is mainland China, but that's not true. Taiwan, Germany, Japan, South Korea, Switzerland, Singapore and many others have run similar positions. The problem is with the global trading system itself.
2/6
As long as countries like the US (and the EU soon?) continue to accommodate global saving imbalances, our current trading system allows for a kind of Kalecki paradox in which individual economies can be rewarded for behavior that undermines growth in the system as a whole.
3/6
Keynes explained this in 1944: economies that repress domestic demand in order to subsidize their manufacturing reduce overall global demand, but are able nonetheless to grow more quickly by taking a larger share of other countries' demand.
Read 6 tweets
Jan 6
1/14
Unfortunately I don't subscribe to Krugman's substack, so I cannot comment on the whole article, but I can say that the first few paragraphs lay out the issue very accurately and with commendable simplicity. He certainly understands the main issues.
open.substack.com/pub/paulkrugma…
2/14
He notes: "In the past, China achieved stunning economic growth in part through a combination of very high savings and very high investment. Its savings remain very high, but investment in China is running into diminishing returns in the face of slowing technological...
3/14
progress and a shrinking working-age population. Yet the Chinese government keeps failing to take effective steps to reduce savings and increase consumer demand. Instead, China is in effect exporting its excess savings via its massive trade surplus. It is using consumer...
Read 13 tweets
Jan 3
1/11
Philip Coggan: "It is a mug’s game trying to predict the end of a boom with any precision. They last much longer than anyone might reasonably expect. That is true of bull markets, as well as economic advances. The reason is that markets and... ft.com/content/2ae4ac…
2/11
economies find ways to support themselves. George Soros, the well-known investor and philanthropist, has a term for it: reflexivity."

Coggan then explains that reflexivity is Soros' name for positive feedback loops embedded in economies and financial systems.
3/11
This is a very important concept that too few economists recognize and embed in their analyses, although most traders and investors understand it intuitively.

The point that Hyman Minsky would have added is that positive feedback loops are nothing mysterious.
Read 11 tweets
Jan 3
1/7
SCMP: "As China grapples with persistent deflationary pressure, scholars from one of the country’s top universities have urged the government to take more forceful action to prevent the economy from becoming trapped in a Japan-style downward spiral."
scmp.com/economy/china-…
2/7
The article continues: "“Japan’s experience has shown that once households form the expectation that prices won’t rise over the medium to long term, it becomes nearly impossible to break that mindset,” said He Xiaobei, a professor at Peking University."
3/7
She argues that Beijing should adopt a binding inflation target and make reviving price growth a top priority. She's right, but I am not sure what this means in policy terms. In the US or Europe, it would mean expanding money rapidly enough to set off price increases.
Read 7 tweets
Dec 29, 2025
1/7
SCMP: "China is tapping the brakes on some subway expansions, including in certain affluent cities, reflecting a shift from the debt-fuelled infrastructure boom of the past to a new era of fiscal discipline and investment efficiency."
scmp.com/economy/china-…
2/7
I've long argued that much of the infrastructure investment in the past decade was not economically viable. It was implemented mainly to keep economic activity from dropping, and not to create economic value, and is why the debt used to fund this investment was growing...
3/7
so much faster than the economy itself. But while there are still a few diehard analysts who insist that misallocated investment isn't a problem, it seems increasingly to have become the official point of view that it is, even if they have trouble saying it explicitly.
Read 7 tweets
Dec 21, 2025
1/4
WSJ: "The number of ride-hailing drivers in China tripled to 7.5 million in the four years to 2024, even though the number of rides grew only by about 60% during the same period, government data shows."
wsj.com/world/asia/14-…
2/4
By shifting into the gig economy, workers reduce overall unemployment numbers without increasing the the total amount of wages workers receive. This is one of the reasons consumption growth has been so weak.

To boost consumption growth, Beijing must figure out how to...
3/4
get total wages to rise much more quickly, although it must do this without further undermining already-unprofitable businesses. But if it continues to subsidize business profits while also subsidizing wage growth, the rise in debt will only accelerate.
Read 4 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us!

:(