Sarah Profile picture
Sep 15, 2020 20 tweets 4 min read Read on X
Thread

3 years ago today, my first cochlear implant was activated. This is what I wish I’d known then.

Context for those who don’t know me: I’m a deaf audiologist who uses 2 CIs. Before that I was a long-term hearing aid user. I communicate in spoken/written English & ASL. 1/
I got both of my CIs *while* I was studying for my AuD. I spent well over half of my AuD program learning how to hear with CIs. I wish I’d known how hard that would be. Completing an AuD program is challenging enough without getting implanted twice along the way. 2/
I wish that I’d known how frequently some person would tell me, “Of course I don’t expect you to hear normally!” and then a few days later be frustrated with me for not hearing things. I’m glad to have so many supportive people in my life who don’t expect that of me. 3/
I wish that I’d known my second CI would turn out much better than my first. My right ear, which I got implanted first, is more medically complex than my left. The outcome for my right was still much better than what I had with a hearing aid, and now I’m okay with it... 4/
...but at the beginning I had a lot of frustration. I knew about CIs as an AuD student, but many other people were telling me that certainly I’d be “almost like a hearing person” with my first CI because I already had spoken English fluency. 5/
Having to explain to people constantly that spoken language fluency isn’t the only ingredient in a successful CI outcome... that became tiresome quickly. I wish I’d known how many people would tell me dismissively, “At least you don’t haven’t develop language with a CI!” 6/
I wish I’d known that my not-so-great CI outcome for my right ear wasn’t my fault. I used my audiology knowledge and tried everything. I heard more than I did with a hearing aid but still not as well as others expected me to... 7/
...and I was told in subtle and not-so-subtle ways by some that maybe I was signing “too much” and not listening enough. Or that maybe I didn’t want a good outcome and I got my first CI for the purpose of being negative about CIs and saying that they “don’t work” when they do. 8/
It wasn’t until I had a great outcome with my second CI that those same people started to believe my difficulty with the first CI. I wish I’d known that I’d get all of those messages from people in my life. I wish that I hadn’t blamed myself for what I couldn’t control. 9/
I wish I’d known that my first and second CI activations would be opposite experiences. Although activation for my second CI went well and was a positive experience overall, activation for my first CI was a stressful and upsetting experience. 10/
Problems beyond what is usually expected at a CI activation came up, it took a long time to get me to hear anything at all, and I spent most of the appointment crying because I thought I’d been through surgery for nothing. And the sound was not what I was expecting. 11/
I wish that I’d known I would have a much better experience with my second CI and that in time I would feel better about my first CI. I wish that I’d known how challenging all of the hard parts would be to explain to other people when seeking support. 12/
Most importantly, I wish I’d known at the time of my first CI activation that: 1) I need no one’s permission to use CI technology in the way that works best for me rather than someone else’s way, and 2) I am still me and still deaf. 13/
At the time my first CI was activated, I *told* myself that a lot. I said it often to other people too. I think I was trying to make myself believe it because I was regularly encountering the opposite message. But believing it emotionally took a while. It wasn’t automatic. 14/
The social-emotional aspects of using CI technology: that’s something I wish *other* people knew and understood. This technology is great, but using it can bring up identity issues, difficult changes in family dynamics, and other challenges. I’ve experienced all of this. 15/
At this point in my life, I’m happy with my CIs. I still don’t hear very well with my right one, but it’s still better than having a hearing aid on that ear. And binaural summation makes my right one worth continuing to use. I’m very happy with my left. 16/
At the same time, taking my processors off at the end of a day is like a slice of heaven. Such a relief to have silence after a long day of listening. In some ways, my CIs make me feel more deaf: I like the contrast between the audibility they give and my natural silence. 17/
What I hope for most on this anniversary of my first activation is more nuanced conversation about CIs. Too often, this technology is discussed in extremes: CIs are wonderful or CIs are harmful. Neither of those perspectives tells the whole story. 18/
If you see this thread as negative, take a moment to think before commenting. CI users shouldn’t be afraid to discuss CIs realistically: good and difficult parts. Being realistic doesn’t hurt anyone. It helps people who are considering CIs to develop realistic expectations. 19/
Anyway, happy third birthday to my fake hearing. That first activation day is a day I’ll always remember with mixed emotions. Probably will always be meaningful in a weird way. Not as meaningful as my memories of learning ASL, though! 🤟🏻🧏🏻‍♀️

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Sarah

Sarah Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @sarahlovesears

Jun 14, 2022
Something I’ve been considering the past two days after replies to my recent threads: often, people learn about a technology that “helps” someone. Then, somehow along the way as they see the technology in use, they start advocating for more people to use it. Is that a problem?
I think being aware of assistive tech is good. There are lots of people who don’t know about various assistive tech that could make their lives easier. I’m always grateful when someone tells me about something new that I haven’t encountered yet.
But awareness of and advocacy for assistive tech access is not the same as telling people they should use it or else they’re selfish. Or telling them how to use it and suggesting that they’re selfish if they don’t use it in they way you want them to.
Read 13 tweets
Jun 13, 2022
One of the advantages of wearing such colorful hearing tech is that I can contribute to reducing stigma. But there’s a trade off. The disadvantage is that sometimes, people gawk at my head and even take photos. That happened just now while I was in line to buy an iced tea.
At least the woman who did it this time asked first. But it was asked in a way that implied I wasn’t supposed to say no. I asked if she knows someone who uses cochlear implants. Often, that’s why people want a photo. They want to show their DHH child, grandchild, etc.
When that’s the case, I don’t mind. Colorful hearing tech is a fun way of showing one’s style and personality. I love showing people, especially kids, that their devices don’t have to be in dull colors if they don’t want them to be. But that wasn’t the reason this woman asked.
Read 4 tweets
Jun 13, 2022
Question someone sent to me in a DM: do cochlear implants really sound like the CI simulations on the internet? The short answer is no. CI simulations offer examples of the input CI users get from the device. But the sound quality changes when the brain interprets the input.
Having an example of the input is helpful for understanding that CI users don’t get a high quality signal like hearing people do when they hear. There’s a lot missing that the brain has to work to fill in, and that’s why listening with CIs can get exhausting.
But the robotic sound quality of CI simulations is not the daily listening experience of CI users. Knowing the lived experience of the sound quality isn’t fully possible unless you are a CI user yourself.
Read 5 tweets
Jun 12, 2022
New experience for me as a deaf Catholic this afternoon: deacon asked, “Could you access the Mass today?” First time this has happened to me outside of a deaf parish. When I said no, he immediately asked what I need for better access and pulled the priest into the conversation.
And they both listened and offered to work with me on getting my access needs met for Mass. This is my neighborhood parish that I’ve not attended much for all the years I’ve lived here because no interpreter, captioning or other accommodations. Was very pleasantly surprised!
Hopefully, it’ll work out. I’d been going to an interpreted Mass at a local pilgrimage site that’s not a parish, or Latin Mass because it’s felt more equalizing with me not being the only one reading the missal. Occasionally gone to a deaf parish that requires a bit of a drive.
Read 4 tweets
Jun 12, 2022
This stuff doesn’t surprise me, but I’m reminded of wrong assumptions ppl make about deaf CI users every time I tweet about CIs. Ppl really do think we have to depend on hearing tech to communicate and function. And that having CIs obligates us to use them at all waking moments.
And that taking the CI processors off necessarily means intentionally cutting off the world. And that it means choosing to be disabled, which implies that deaf people with CIs are somehow magically changed to hearing people. Not true, folks.
As if hearing people don’t have communication needs too, don’t ever take quiet time to themselves, don’t ever text other hearing people while sitting in the same room, and don’t ever use non-spoken communication modalities.
Read 5 tweets
Jun 12, 2022
Good example of the kind of attitude I was describing in the initial thread. There are still a lot of hearing people who assume that if a deaf person doesn’t have their CI processors on, that puts the burden of communication on the hearing person.
Why do people think hearing is required for us to take on our fair share of the communication burden? I mean, I’m sure there’s some deaf person somewhere who doesn’t do their part. But that’s not what I was promoting in the original thread. Communication is a team effort.
Also, I always find it more than a little ironic when someone on Twitter tries to educate me about how the brain needs practice to hear with CIs. My profile states clearly that I’m an audiologist. Does anyone really think I don’t know that?
Read 5 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us!

:(