Court is considering the issue of declaration of results for final year students.
We have received 900 applications for comfort letters. We have sorted 292 emails, out of which 14 are from PG: Prof Rawat
Is it for Indian universities as well? : Court
I don't know. Have to check if 900 applications include requests for Indian universities also: Prof Rawat
Didn't UGC say that indian universities will not insist on results even after Sept 30?: Court
We are only concentrating on foreign universities. The Court may clarify that. We have limited man power. We have to work towards declaration of results too: Adv M Rupal for DU.
Adv Rupal says that a deadline may be given till when the students can apply for issuance of comfort letters to foreign universities.
Your Notification is open ended: Court
Time may be given till Friday: DU
By the end of this month, we will complete the evaluation of PG students who want to go abroad: Prof Rawat
That's only 15 students. Assuming if it becomes 50, end of this month is too much. Can we ask you to declare their confidential result by September 25?: Court
That's not possible: Prof Rawat
Okay 30 Sept is the last date for declaration of results of PG students who have applied to foreign universities: Court
We have a portal. Student can access there: Adv Rupal
We will send the result : Prof Rawat
Not send, declare the result: Court
Yes, we can do : Prof Rawat
Is LLB V semester result available? : Court
It is possible but they want me to verify: Prateek Sharma
Why is it subject to verification?: Court
We can put a stamp and verification: Prof Rawat
Put a digital signature. It is good enough: Court
Okay: Prof Rawat
When will you send the comfort letter as per the format approved by the Grievance Committee? : Court
UG we can send. PG scripts are to be evaluated: Prof Rawat
Those who are on a deadline can we sent : Prof Rawat
277 application are from UG. Those them, you release in two days. For PG, you are declaring results by Sept 30: Court
We have to make a program for the format of comfort letter: Prof Rawat
You do it on priority basis then so that no student suffers: Court
Intimate the students that comfort letter has been sent : Adv Rupal
Students must be informed that they have been provisionally passed: Adv Kamal Gupta from GRC.
The entire life of students would be prejudiced. It is an Article 21 issue. I'm sad to see that Delhi University asked the Court to have an in camera hearing: Adv Amir Pasrich for a student
We have faith in the judges. The request doesn't smell good. We're dealing with 1% of the university. They are capable of giving results for all of us in 10 days: Adv Pasrich
Difficulty is that I've seen the affidavits and I don't see the criteria as to why results can't be declared for them: Adv Pasrich
It's not working. We've considered everything: Court
Nobody understands comfort letter outside India : Adv Pasrich
Whatever has to be done, has to be done across the board. There is a genuine difficulty. We can only tighten the schedule: Court
Court records the submissions of the parties.
Prof Rawat, Dean of examination has assured that the letter for UG students containing their provisional results shall be sent on priority basis to foreign universities depending on cut off dates: Court records
For PG students who are seeking admission in foreign universities and applied to DU for comfort letters, results shall be declared on or before 28 Sept. Result to be declared on web portal: Court
Students can download the result from the portal.
DU is directed to issue letter saying the cut off date for receiving requests for comfort letter is September 18: Court
Court questions how much time would it take to collate UG results.
It takes time: Prof Rawat
Court notes that the entire process of evaluation is online.
When did you dispatch the answer sheet? : Court
It started on August 24: Prof Sanjeev Singh
Why can't it be declared by Sept 30 then?: Court
Email submissions are to be verified for duplication. Integration with portal is going on it and it is a tedious process. Thousands of emails were received. 35% emails have been integrated. 40 people are working on it : Prof Sanjeev Singh
Today is just the 15th. You are saying most are duplicates of what was submitted on the portal so they need not be checked: Court
On OBE portal, more than 60% evaluation is done: Prof Sanjeev Singh.
Why can't be wrap it up by first and second week of October? Court can only request: Court
We pursuing it with the examiners. Portal will give the matrix and the moderation etc has to be done : Prof Sanjeev Singh
Does moderation need physical intervention?: Court
Moderation is different from arrival of mean and standard deviation. Moderation is physical: Adv Rupal
Earlier, examiner used to sit together and extreme marking was avoided. Now everyone is checking in their own house and doing it on their own. For the benefit of students, marks are to be later scaled. Thereafter grading takes place : Senior Adv BB Gupta from GRC
Moderation is for students who are failing: Prof Rao
Okay, we are not on all this. We are on the deadline : Court
How much time will moderation take?: Court
I can't say anything on declaring results by first week of October: Prof Rawat
Court had given us time till Sept 22 to come up with the timeline: Adv Rupal
We have to review everything. All departments have to work in coordination: Adv Rupal
In view of the procedure this year which entailed emailing of answer sheets, teachers are required to email the results to Examination Branch. Whereafter, results are moderated and then graded : Court records
Court records submissions on the sorting of duplicate results and status of evaluation as informed by Du.
Keeping in mind the balance work left, it is directed that DU shall issue letters to Principals of all colleges to emphasize the urgency in the matter and request that evaluation be expedited so that results can be declared by first week of October 2020: Court orders
Court directs that hearing be adjourned till September 22.
Court master says it's a physical hearing date.
Matter will be taken up on September 21.
There are to a letter to enable students to apply for visas: Senior Adv BB Gupta from GRC.
For UG students who are going abroad, DU shall confirm having sent the comfort letter to the concerned student and say that he/she has been provisionally passed : Court
The deadline of October first week is physically not possible: Adv Rupal
Let them say that. Come on the next date: Court
Matter to be heard next on September 23.
Hearing concludes..
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Whether chargesheet filed without Forensic Science Laboratory (FSL) report in case under NDPS Act, 1985 can be termed as 'incomplete report' under CrPC? #SupremeCourt to shortly hear the matter
A three-judge Bench of Justices Surya Kant, Sudhanshu Dhulia and Ujjal Bhuyan will also examine various related aspects that concern the fairness and efficacy of the trials under the NDPS Act
#SupremeCourt to shortly hear appeal by Narcotics Control Bureau (NCB) against 2023 Delhi HC decision ruling that application for drawing sample of narcotic drugs or psychotropic substance before Magistrate u/s 52A of NDPS Act should be made within 72 hours @narcoticsbureau
In May 2023, the High Court had observed that such an application cannot be moved at the “whims and fancies” of Narcotics Control Bureau, being the prosecuting agency.
When matter came before Supreme Court earlier, the Court had orally remarked that Section 52A is enabling not mandatory.
Supreme Court to shortly deliver judgment laying down pan-India guidelines on use of bulldozer by state governments as a punitive measure to demolish house or shop of a person immediately after he or she is named as accused of an offence
#SupremeCourt
Judgement to be delivered by a bench of Justices BR Gavai and KV Vishwanathan
#SupremeCourt #bulldozer
Supreme Court Bar Association holds farewell for CJI DY Chandrachud #SupremeCourtofIndia
Sr Adv Rachana Srivastava, VP SCBA: CJI Chandrachud was a part of 23 constitution benches. Your journey in the legal world has pushed boundaries. You leave behind a court which has hope for all of us. You had unwavering dedication to the rule of law.
Sr Adv Kapil Sibal, President SCBA: when you have to journey the judge of any judge what is the benchmark. We can criticise a judge all we want. You have to judge the man in the backdrop of the times we live in. When we discuss him, his manner, his affability which is of one of the greatest judges of this country.
Ceremonial bench on the last working day of CJI DY Chandrachud
CJI Chandrachud along with CJI Designate Sanjiv Khanna, Justices JB Pardiwala and Manoj Misra
#SupremeCourt
Attorney General R Venkataramani: Recently in Brazil after the conference ended everyone started dancing. what if I ask everyone here to dance on your retirement and I am sure most will vote in favour of me.
SG Tushar Mehta: Complete impartiality in dispensation of justice. We were never hesitant in good or bad matters before you. For govt we won few we lost many but we knew that we did not get an opportunity to convince the court and put our point forward. My lord has always taken a stand as the karta of the family
DYC will really be missed.
#BREAKING Supreme Court to State of UP: How can you just enter someone's home and demolish it without following course of law or serving notice?
CJI DY Chandrachud: We are not inclined to accept the request of the State of UP to adjourn the proceedings since pleadings are completed and the court is required to evaluate the materials placed before to decide legality of action.
#SupremeCourtofIndia @myogioffice
CJI: The following position emerges from narration of facts: state of UP has not produced original width of state highway notified as national highway, no material was placed to show whether any inquiry was conducted to figure out encroachers, there is no material produced to indicate that land was acquired before demolition was carried out. The state has failed to disclose the precise extent of encroachments, the width of the existing road, the width of notified highway, extent of property of petitioner which feel within central line of highway and why the demolition was needed beyond the area of alleged encroachment. NHRC report shows demolition was far in excess than the area of alleged encroachment. #SupremeCourtofIndia
#BREAKING
CJI: The demolition was carried out without any notice or disclosure to the occupiers of the basis of the demarcation or the extent of demolition to be carried out. It is clear demolition was high handed and without the authority of law. The petitioner states the demolition was only because the petitioner had flagged irregularities in road construction in newspaper report. Such action by the state cannot be countenanced and when dealing with private property law has to be followed.