This misreads the EU's position and the protocol. Thread:
https://twitter.com/Telegraph/status/1305450996676603904
1. Purpose: protocol designed to prevent a hard border between Ireland and NI: the only way to do that was to agree a UK-wide backstop (which PM rejected) OR ensure greater alignment between NI and Ireland & move admin procedures to the Irish Sea. PM negotiated the latter
2. Length: The protocol will apply even if there is an FTA – it’s just that certain provisions could be superseded (i.e. improved) by FTA. This is why FTA talks are so important. And why any attempt to unpick WA cd seriously jeopardise them.
3. Length (2): The protocol can be disapplied but only if NI Assembly decides to cancel it (that decision can only happen in 4 years time - and wd take 2 years from that point to unwind).
4. Disputes: The PM himself acknowledged that there were provisions in the WA to resolve disputes over the WA and Protocol. One way to minimise trade friction inside the UK is through FTA talks. But unilateral measures, even as a safety net, risk hardening EU position. END.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
