Honestly, instead of doing pushups to bring awareness to the veteran suicide issue, how about we destigmatize mental health treatment in the military and leaders be open about how we *all* struggle at different points in our lives
I'll start - I've been in therapy for 2 years
It started because I'd buried stuff from my past for a long time - my upbringing told me that men just suck it up, put their heads down, and push on. Add military service and a deployment in there, and I was struggling. I finally decided to talk to someone about it.
But even then, it took me SIX MONTHS to finally pick up the phone, such was my hesitance to admit that I alone couldn't handle it. Six months to break through the lying point in my brain that told me that "you're weak if you do this. You can't lead troops"
That was even with close friends telling me to do it. Close friends in the Army telling me that it helped them, that it turned them around. I even told other people to do it, when I was too scared to even pick up the phone. But I finally did.
It was like a light came on
Suddenly, I wasn't carrying my problems around in my head, having them strike at me when I was at my most low. I learned coping skills, we talked thru issues, and I grew stronger. More able to navigate without turning to something like alcohol for relief. I was able to stand.
While in command, I've recommended it to my soldiers & have tried to destigmatize it as much as possible. But it's tough to crack thru the Army - I disclosed it during my yearly PHA & the provider said, "Great, but I'll just say you're coping, don't want a flag"
If you're struggling, you're not alone.
There are resources. You don't have to carry the dark feeling with you. This is *not* a permanent feeling. Things *can* change. Admitting it is the first step, and can be the hardest. But I'm here to say it's worth it.
You're worth it.
(btw, this is not to talk down to anyone doing the 22 pushups a day or anything like that - we need everyone to be thinking of preventative measures and raising awareness)
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
So, I'm finishing up Sears' "Lincoln's Lieutenants" for the 2d time, and it remains an exceptional work. One of the most solid examinations of brigade and higher leadership of the Army of the Potomac that exists. But while I love everything Sears does, he's in the tactics trap
For example, he has nothing but disdain for Sigel and Butler, and other "political" generals
And yes, from a tactical level, they're not great. Not really bringing in the battlefield Ws
But that's only half the story.
By keeping Franz Sigel in a US Army uniform, Lincoln is ensuring continued German American enlistments
Political generals ensure continued Congressional and state financial and materiel support for the war
There's a decent chance y'all are gonna hear about some conspiracy theorist shit from the 1600s based on my consumption of the alcohols this evening
This acts as your WARNORD
So, like, be warned or whatever
Ok so like, you think America today is bad with conspiracy theories
I mean, it's pretty shitty, I won't lie, but it's got nothin on 1689 when everyone apparently lost their shit and just decided to overthrow govt
This historic rant brought to you by 3 incredibly generous G&Ts
Look, it's the 1680s,and shit in the English colonies on north America is getting weird af. Lots of pacts and shit for common defense against those evil papist French who are hiding behind every tree and also probs behind you right now
Modern war remains artillery intensive. Ever since the Russo-Japanese War of 1904, belligerents have been constrained by availability of artillery ammunition. To believe that precision fires significantly changes this is to live in a delusional world. We need more production.
And for the love of the gods, spare me with the "faltering offensive" takes. Operational offensives require mass reserves and mass logistics, as well as incredibly difficult synchronization of combined arms -- and they don't look flashy. They are nasty, grinding, bloody things
If you can achieve a breakthrough, you need more reserves, more logistics to sustain the momentum, but it's very very hard to predict where a breakthrough will happen and then quickly mass combat power at that site. Technology cannot eliminate the tyranny of time and space
I may have had some wine and yo, if you think this was the first time in American history a presidential candidate tried this exact thing, baby, have I got a story for you
It's been a hot minute since we did some #drunjhistory huh
So it's 1876, and America is, as many historians have said, a hot ass mess
Like, former treasoners in the south are actively fighting the 13th, 14th, and 15th amendments and using lots of violence to try to keep white supremacy, US troops are actively fighting them
The election is between Rutherford Hayes, who ate a bullet at South mountain in 62 so you know he's a badass G, and samuel tilden, who's like, a guy. He opposed Lincoln but was like "I guess the union is ok"
And the election is TIGHT. CLOSW. LIKE. super duper close
Teaching cadets about the 2003 invasion of Iraq...They would look at me quizzically after doing the reading, saying "this still doesn't make sense, everyone knew this was a bad idea, why did it happen?"
I'd sigh, and say
"Well, you kinda had to be there at the time"
Well that blew up. Been off Twitter all day.
A few thoughts
One, I was one of those neocons who thought it was a good idea - all of 17 years old, of course. I believed that we wouldn't go to war without true and valid reasons for doing so. I was one of many, many Americans
Two, with the cadets, we had just emerged from a discussion on Vietnam and the Powell Doctrine. They were flabbergasted that Powell agreed to such an open violation of his principles. We spent a lot of time discussing hindsight, politics, and a nation's emotional reaction to 9/11