Arihant Profile picture
15 Sep, 10 tweets, 2 min read
SC orders @SureshChavhanke to defer remaining episodes on “infiltration of Muslims” in UPSC.

Issue is not “infiltration by Muslims”. It’s the Govt whose own policy says Ms will be given special consideration in recruitment.

You don’t need data to prove bias AT ALL.

Thread.
When govt’s official policy states that minorities will be given special consideration in govt jobs, debating over data (increase in M recruitment) is useless.

It’s like with RTE. It doesn’t apply to minority schools. End of discussion. Data shouldn’t even come into picture.
Now the policy.

Point No 10 of PM’s 15 point programme for Minorities:

a) In the recruitment of police personnel, State Governments will be advised to give special consideration to minorities. For this purpose, the composition of selection committees should be representative.
(b) The Central Government will take similar action in the recruitment of personnel to the Central police forces.

Do you really need data now to show bias??
(c) Large scale employment opportunities are provided by the Railways, nationalized banks and public sector enterprises. In these cases also, the concerned departments will ensure that special consideration is given to recruitment from minority communities.
(d) An exclusive scheme will be launched for candidates belonging to minority communities to provide coaching in government institutions as well as private coaching institutes with credibility.
Now, let’s take a look at Sachar report whose recommendations were accepted by govt

It said:

“It is imperative to increase the employment share of Muslims particularly in contexts where there is a great deal of public dealing.”
“The lack of Muslims in public employment — in the bureaucracy, police and the judiciary, and so on — has been a matter of great concern. Discriminatory practices, especially at the time of the interview, were cited as reasons for poor Muslim representation...” Report said.
For UPSC, report said:

“There is a need to improve Muslim participation in the UPSC competitive selection process” And specifically recommended that, “While no discrimination is being alleged, it may be desirable to have minority persons on relevant interview panels.”
No data required here to prove Muslim bias in not only UPSC but all govt jobs. Your govt itself has made it a policy to give the community a special consideration. You can keep trolling through data for academic purposes but train your outrage at the right target: the govt. END

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Arihant

Arihant Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @haryannvi

16 Sep
Islamoleftists always say LJ is a hoax. They ask where is data BUT why you need data when it’s a FACT that when non-Muslim women marry Muslim men, they lose all their rights.

Do you need data to realise how harmful such marriages are to women?

Thread.

swarajyamag.com/politics/love-…
Centre must ban all marriages under Sharia if a women in contract wasn’t born a Muslim. All such marriages should be under Special Marriages Act only. This will help reduce misuse to a great extent. It’s perfectly constitutional.

If govt can ban triple talaq, why not this?
As far as data is concerned, there is plenty out there but it’s not like this will convince those who are hellbent on denying abuse in Sharia marriages.

But let’s see data in just last 1 month.

Situation is so bad in Kanpur that Police has to form a SIT

timesofindia.indiatimes.com/city/kanpur/ut…
Read 13 tweets
1 Aug
Annihilation of Jaati is a fool’s errand. Those who support it have zero understanding of human nature.

In fact, in all the areas where ‘progressives’ have tried to annihilate it, Jaatiwad has taken even deeper roots.

Look at Tamil Nadu.
Let’s say that in Tamil Nadu, we didn’t have anti-Jaati progressive movement for long time.

Come to Punjab and Haryana where Arya Samaj, probably the most anti-Jaati organisation to have ever existed, has been working since 1865 with missionary zeal. Achievement? Zilch.
What do these ‘annihilation of Jaati’ advocates end up doing?

- creating identity crisis for those who fall in their utopian trap
- obliterating diversity of rituals, traditions or practicises of jaatis that become their victims.
Read 6 tweets
7 Jul
BJP should be ashamed of itself. Reserving 75% jobs to locals in Haryana will definitely hurt the growth of pvt sector, however small it is. More importantly, BJP is championing these BreakingIndia ideas just to be in power with Chautalas. Is this your New India @narendramodi?
These kinds of destructive ideas do not suit a national party much less a party which also claims to be nationalistic.
75% quote for locals is applicable to jobs that pay less than Rs 50k per month. What will IT companies in Gurgaon do because they hire most of their starting employees at Rs 25k salary? Move to NOIDA I guess. @mlkhattar do you realise the damage you will do to state’s economy?
Read 4 tweets
26 May
Ignore Twitter trads and read real scholars like Shatavadhani R. Ganesh on Varna in Hinduism.

Quoting him verbatim in this twitter thread. Will plug his pieces at the end.

Before starting, remember this: “varṇa is not a core aspect of Hinduism.”
“It comes under what is called viśeṣa dharma, a set of rules applicable only with limited jurisprudence and are bound by geographical and temporal constraints. It is contextual, not universal, and therefore is a peripheral aspect of our tradition...”
VARNA IN VEDAS

We know for sure that “varṇa has nothing to do with race and ethnicity”. It might have been “a distinction based on occupation or based on the tribes that people belonged to.”

“In the Ṛgveda Saṃhitā, varṇa is not used in the sense of ‘caste’ or ‘class’.....”
Read 21 tweets
14 May
Millions of kids are getting their education on Zoom, Google Classrooms, etc today.

And it’s really amusing to see that our Right to Education act specifies no of classrooms, size of playground, student-teacher ratio for schools. LOL

A reminder again. RTE isn’t about education.
Homeschooling, which is also banned by RTE, has a different meaning now, isn’t it?

You can get your education at home from same school system.

In fact, why not allow entrepreneurs to establish virtual schools which are recognised by the govts. Let boards continue to test as b4.
Now introduce JAM trinity (where M is now smartphone) and see possibilities.

Virtual schools (VS) don’t need all the infra. So tuition fee is way down. They only need to pay teachers who can give their time to many VS.

Govt can pay fees of poorest kids directly to VS via DBT
Read 5 tweets
21 Apr
Thread on the modus operandi of immoral leftists and why they do what they do.

Their group-act is eerily similar to the mafia where a gang of ORGANISED criminals operate with a ruthless behavioural code.

swarajyamag.com/politics/what-…
If the victim is Hindu, especially in saffron robes, his death (even if it has a communal angle) is played down by the Immoral Leftists but if the victim is from the minority community, especially in religious attire, his death is played up (even if it has a secular angle).
Look at Palghar case. First they tried to ignore it and bury the news. When Social Media folks posted 3 lakh+ tweets, they are forced to take notice. But even then, they can’t issue a simple condemnation. Their main concern is not lynching but that it shouldn’t be communalised.
Read 11 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!