People were worried cases would spike further when the UK lifted almost all remaining restrictions in July. The opposite happened.
We must acknowledge that restrictions aren't all that effective in Western countries.
(Except Australia, who just entered their 6th lockdown)
It's interesting that some experts would rather question the accuracy of the data than acknowledge this reality.
Many bad papers looked at these curves in 2020 & concluded that more restrictions is followed by a decline in cases, when the decline would've happened regardless.
If we apply the same flawed logic here, one can say that the lifting of restrictions is followed by fewer cases.
Of course, the modeling isn’t perfect & never will be. But this ensemble of forecasts coming from 250+ researchers has helped add clarity for many over the past year.
The CDC deserves credit for taking a conscious, hands-off approach on this.
That said, I do think there's too much focus on modeling cases/deaths. For ex, I've haven't seen many efforts on vaccination forecasts or infections/immunity estimates.
There may be some reluctance in the general scientific community to do this, so it's hard to blame one entity.
Is containing COVID-19 a requirement for preserving the economy? My analysis suggests: probably not.
In the US, there is no correlation between Covid deaths & changes in unemployment rates.
However, blue states are much more likely to have higher increases in unemployment.
🧵
We can dive deeper by looking at levels of restrictions in each state, using the Oxford Covid-19 Government Response Tracker (OxCGRT).
More restrictions in a state is NOT correlated with fewer COVID-19 deaths.
However, more restrictions IS correlated with higher unemployment.
The most interesting data point is South Dakota.
As the only state to never order closures of restaurants, bars & retail, SD actually saw a 0.5% DECREASE in unemployment since the pandemic started. It also never ordered a mask mandate.