For my whole life, I’ve been like an obnoxious cheerleader for “science,” I’ve been called a new atheist and a believer in scient*ism* with no eye for life’s spiritual side. I’ve been very exercised about the creationist menace and climate deniers. But like, come on
Who looks around right now and thinks, “The real problem with science is that it hasn’t been communicated to people hard enough that it has a political valence”…
Actually, Make Portland Normal…
It’s my opinion that the left is better on science in general than the right, just like the right is better on religion in society or economic incentives being a thing. But not the sort of opinion I’d assert as fact even in an opinion piece
Does nobody acknowledge their own biases anymore? Isn’t that what science-mindedness demands?

And like, wielding “science” as a cudgel is, at the very best, not what studies suggest would be effective communications strategy for increasing public confidence in science
Science has no commandments. It doesn’t tell you not to fly around Europe. It doesn’t tell you whom to vote for. It doesn’t say things. It finds things, provisionally. It is very good for figuring out how to build rockets, it’s worse at human stuff.
It can’t even figure out if eggs are healthy, and it really doesn’t know whether it’d be better to slow the economic growth rate of the third world to limit carbon emissions. Acting like it does is unscientific hubris.

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh

Keep Current with Nicholas Clairmont

Nicholas Clairmont Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!


Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @NickClairmont1

6 Jun
Glad this is finally public. Behaving like reading Andrew is a threat rather than an edifying pleasure is outrageous and flatly absurd.…
If you’re worldview can’t allow the airing of the mellifluous and sharp prose of the immigrant, beagle-loving hero of a recent civil rights victory who’s if anything a tad too effusive about Obama, you fail liberal tolerance class.
Surely the best job in woke journalism is to be the gay representative on the identitarian soviet of token “sensitivity readers” who gets to try to censor Andrew Sullivan. Or is he allowed to sensitivity read himself on that account?
Read 7 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!

This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!