Matthew Claxton Profile picture
Sep 15, 2020 16 tweets 5 min read Read on X
I have written/deleted like waaaaaay too many cynical tweets today, so let's talk about something that's really important: How Star Trek: Voyager could have been really, really good. 1/
Cards on the table: I am a DS9 guy. DS9ers and Voyergerites are natural enemies. Sometimes for old times sake we pick up our rhetorical broken pool cues and smack each other around in the piss-stained back alley that is the internet. 2/
But I was SO EXCITED when Voyager premiered. It had so much potential! The premise promised a combination of the complex politics of DS9 and the star-spanning journeys of Next Gen!

I! Was! Hyped! 3/
And then… well at the end of the pilot, when the Maquis put on Starfleet uniforms, and we'd met Neelix… I was kinda worried. And I stopped watching before the end of season 1. It wasn't for me.

How could it have been good, nay, great? I'm glad you asked! 4/
There are two paths Voyager could have taken.

Path A is more obvious – it's the one DS9 was accused of taking, the path followed by Battlestar Galactica and Firefly and several other shows of the era. Not quite grimdark, but we're getting there. 5/
This is Voyager where getting home is the goal, but survival is the day-to-day struggle. The Maquis and Federation crews work together because they have to to stay alive. Things break down. The ship gets battered, broken, repaired, breaks again. Essential items run low. 6/
(Yes, I know the show played with this trope occasionally. In between, y'know, wacky holodeck adventures and planet-of-the-week escapades. Flirting with this theme just made it more apparent how little the show was committed to it.) 7/
This version of the series sees a slow but steady loss of crew, losses that are deeply felt. The Voyager's crew has to make hard choices, not because of the prime directive, but because they simply can't do everything a Starfleet ship should be able to do. 8/
There is another version of the series. This one is brighter, lighter, although not free of darkness. It's in tune with the original impulses towards utopianism that drove the original series and Next Gen as well.

In this version, the ship stays true to Federation ideals. 9/
…and you're saying "Yeah, they totally did that, didn't they?"

And they did, but for the most part, they did it without much difficulty.

It should have been HARD.

It should have been a sacrifice. /10
In this version, after it becomes clear that they aren't going to get back to the Alpha Quadrant easily, the battered crew takes stock, and Janeway says their mission has changed, and it hasn't changed.

They're an exploration vessel. /11
Aim for the Alpha Quadrant, sure. But she won't even promise that everyone gets home. No false hope. Instead, they explore. They chart. They seek out new life and new civilizations, they… I think you know this bit.

The mood is one of doomed nobility. /12
The important thing is how you end this version.

The second to last episode, they survive something by the skin of their teeth. Just barely.

You end it with the ship coming home.

/13
Voyager arrives in Federation space, and it's beat to hell. Obviously a different ship than we saw in the previous episode. A vastly more advanced Federation ship greets them. /14
The Voyager is crewed by a very strange group. Children and grandchildren of Starfleet and Maquis crewmembers. Strange beings they picked up along the way. Heck, maybe the Doctor is now the captain?

All of them are wearing Starfleet insignia, however. /15
You end with them asking permission to transmit data to the first ship they meet.

They have nearly a century's worth of discoveries to share. They'll want shore leave.

And then they'll need to know about their next assignment.

And that's how you end Voyager. /16

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Matthew Claxton

Matthew Claxton Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @ouranosaurus

Jul 10, 2022
Pirating books and pretending it's some kind of liberatory act is roughly the same as doing a dine & dash at a nice restaurant and thinking you're sticking it to "the man," when actually the waitress will get the cost of your meal docked from her pay.
Do you want to know the single way you can make books cheaper/free for people right now?

Call your local municipal/regional politicians and tell them you are a single-issue voter and that issue is LIBRARIES.
You think your state/provincial/federal politicians are unresponsive? Perhaps!

But in many cities and towns, your civic leaders count their wins in double handfuls of votes. If you show up with a petition that says "GIVE MONEY TO THE LIBRARY OR GET THE BOOT" they will sit up.
Read 6 tweets
Jul 8, 2022
Me, sweating: So there's this, this guy? I dunno, he's a detective. Also, it's the future. Anyway, someone murders a robot. *sweating intensifies* Did I mention the robots? Those are important. His mom is a nanobot swarm now? The detective, not the robot's mom. Fuck, I dunno.
Creating a contest where authors have to publicly pitch their ideas is definitely going to divide authors into two groups, and it's not going to be "Good writers" and "Less good writers."
For all that synopses and agent pitch letters are awful, AT LEAST THEY ARE WRITTEN.

I mean, I've spent years working on being socially adroit and tamping down my natural desire to just stand in corners, and on my best day, I'm still "average human interaction" at best.
Read 4 tweets
Feb 11, 2022
Good thread on the Freeman On The Land roots of a lot of the weird beliefs/behaviour of many of the Ottawa protesters, mentions seminal Canadian case Meads vs Meads.

One thing it doesn't flatly say is that these beliefs ≠ simply not liking govt.
Lots of people on right, left, even center dislike either current govt or want to replace it with some other system entirely, i.e. libertarians, anarchists etc.

Freeman, or other followers of OPCA (organized pseudolegal commercial arguments, per the Canadian courts)…
…believe they know secret methods of nullifying government control over them here and now.

It's an esoteric belief, that is, one based on the idea of hidden knowledge.

Magical thinking, on a truly bizarre scale.
Read 8 tweets
Feb 9, 2022
Anyway, here's a little bit of what it's like to be a reporter over the last couple of years.
I mostly only catch the edges of this – the contempt from Facebook comments, the accusations that we're on the take, the casual drive-by claims that I'm a liar.

A lot of my colleagues get it worse than I do by miles.
Most of this abuse comes from the far right and the conspiracy theorists, but in general, it feels more and more like there's no one on our side.

Everyone, right, left, and centre, has, at best, contempt for the media in general, and no desire to discern between outlets.
Read 6 tweets
Aug 30, 2020
Just started watching the Little Nemo movie, and pausing to note that the script/story credits include Chris Columbus, Moebius, and Ray Bradbury.

WHAT?!?
And Brian Froud involved in the design. Sure. Why not.

How was Jodorowsky not involved in this too?
We've got a murderer's row of weird talent involved, and yet there's just white credits over coloured backgrounds while this sugary Care Bears-style title song plays, and I am filled with foreboding for what is to come…

…ooh, Rene Auberjonois and Tress MacNeil do voices!
Read 26 tweets
Aug 21, 2020
Been thinking a lot about Stephen Pinker and his fellow "Things are getting better all the time!" cheerleaders.

*glances around at everything*

We all agree they deserve to wear an "I'M A DIPSHIT" sign in the public square for a day or so, right?
The basic flaw with their thinking wasn't their analysis that SOME things were getting better and better.

It's true, for decades levels of violence and poverty were falling around the world. In general, things were getting better.

But that's obviously not the whole story.
To paraphrase, the better world was here, but it wasn't evenly distributed. Poverty fell but income inequality shot up like a rocket. And lower levels of violence ON AVERAGE don't help you if you're a member of a vulnerable group who's getting no fucking aid or protection.
Read 8 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us!

:(