Anil Profile picture
15 Sep, 26 tweets, 6 min read
Option Market Anomalies (Thread)

In July, single stock options volume exceeded share volume for 1st time ever. Add to that all the index options and you’ve got a situation where the tail is wagging the dog.

via ⁦@zerohedge
This is a significant event that deserves close attention.

Options theory assumes that the actions of the option trader don’t affect the underlying. Given banks delta hedging of options risk, this is clearly not true.
However, if the scale of options trading is small relative to that in the underlying, like it has been historically, the assumption is largely true. Funky things happen when these oft forgotten assumptions underlying the market are violated.

Let me give you an example.
In the early 90’s, I remember a client asking us for a bid on a $200m call on a Canadian way off the run short bond. Unlike today, back then, because of Fed activity, short rates were volatile. Canadian rates were more volatile than those in the US.
This being an off the run meant it was even more volatile than the benchmark. The entire issue was only $1.1b in size. Given the small size of the issue and its off the run status, it didn’t trade continuously. It gapped.
I figured that owning a good chunk of a small issue would give me effective control, so rather than fading my price for the relatively large size (18% of the issue), I bid up for it. Not surprisingly, we won. I was young and cocky figuring I was a total genius buying this thing.
It was going to be a money machine.

Things started out well, but then something started to go wrong. One morning, the market shot up violently, I put up a cheap offer to get the party started. But, rather than getting lifted immediately, someone offered lower.
It didn’t feel right. Every time, I’d put in a bid or offer someone would step in front of me. Frustrated, I told my bond broker we needed to go out for a drink. I asked him, was it one guy stepping in front, or a bunch of people. He said it was just one. I asked him who.
He said he couldn’t tell me. He said it was weird. It was an off-off-off the run issue that just didn’t trade. Then suddenly last week, the issue sprung to life, but it wasn’t dealers short desks trading it. It was guys like me. A derivatives trader.
We were always the outsiders in the bond market. Did I know him, I asked. He said, very well. I had to know. So, I pressured him further. He wrote a common abbreviation for a first name on his napkin, turned it over and slid it to me. He got up, said good night and left.
I flipped over the napkin. It was my buddy, the options trader at the bank across the road.

Why was he stepping in front of me? He must have done the same trade. I didn’t get quite the exclusive deal I thought I was getting. Soon, that one issue froze. Yields went up and down.
It was pandemonium. Yet the bond I was long was stuck. I ask my bond broker who else was involved. He said it was just guys like me. How many, I asked. All five of you. We were the rates options traders of the five Canadian chartered banks.
We were stepping in front of each other so much, this bond never moved. Though the market was moving 30bps a day, this bond never moved. My dream trade had turned into a nightmare.
The client had used the violation of the principle that option trading doesn’t affect the underlying against us by making us fight each other. Between us, we had eliminated the very volatility we has paid for.

My boss asked why I was losing so much money. I explained.
He didn’t care. He wanted it to stop and was really pissed that some client had outsmarted the street.

That’s what happens when the options volume exceeds that in the underlying. That’s exactly what the client counted on. But, that’s not the way it ended.
In speaking to his counterparts, my boss found out that the options desks of all the other banks were hurting too. He asked me how I’d do if my position was $1b but no one else had it. I told him, I’d make a killing.

He suggested I approach my counterparts and buy them out.
First two paid me money vs the mark to take it off their hands. 3rd wanted mid. Done. 4th figured out my game and wanted more. I told him he risked screwing himself. A week went by. My losses were mounting, but my boss hung by me.
The heads of the 3 other banks were happy to have gotten rid of the dog. The head of the desk of the 4th bank was ready to kill his options trader. The trader called and said he’d sell it my price. I told him I wasn’t there. He asked where I was. I showed him a price way back.
He told me there had to be mistake. I told him that was my price and he could leave it if he didn’t like it.
I thought he was going to cry. I told him I’d show him mid for a yes or no. He said yours even before I got the price out.
I now owned a call on $1b of a $1.1b issue. No one would touch this orphaned bond.
I started driving the price down. The puzzled client asked what’s going on. Everyone told him they were out. He asked me. I told him it felt like others had the same trade. Silence.
The client who was long this bond had found a way to pocket the premium and dump his bonds on us. When the price started plummeting, he began dumping the bonds. I was the only buyer. Once I bought a few hundred million, I began to march up the price of the bond.
On days the market was up, this was up more. When the market was down, this was up. At first he kept selling. I bought, selling BA (like ED) futures against it to keep my rate risk in line. Riding on the rally in futures, I kept buying.
Because of his sales earlier on, and his outstanding calls, he began to buy. It was wild. Some mornings, I’d start the bid 10 points higher than last night. On the way up, I sold out some of my longs, but I still held $300m at the end.
On expiry, we exercised our call giving us $1.3b of a $1.1b issue. Delivery kept failing. Slowly, we’d put out a bond here or there. Sometimes, it would get lifted before the price made the screen. We came out just fine though we had to hold the bonds till maturity.
When the basic set of assumptions on which the market is based are violated, funky things happen. Gentlemen, strap on your seat belts.

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh

Keep Current with Anil

Anil Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!


Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @anilvohra69

10 Sep
Analysis of Trump 2020 (Thread)

Something is not right here.

@vtchakarova said years ago that Trump wasn’t going to be on the ballot in 2020. All sorts of things changed over time. Periodically, I’d circle back to her and ask if her view had changed. She refused to budge.
That’s where the problem started. Velina is a very smart lady and global strategy is her gig. If this was her call, she was seeing something I wasn’t.

Let’s review the facts:
1) If Trump loses, he will be indicted for various state and federal crimes and likely go to prison
2) the statute of limitations on his crimes is 5 years.
3) he can’t be charged as long as he is president
4) no matter who wins, it’s going to be close.
5) Trump is NOT going to leave it to the voters to decide if he should go to prison.

So, what’s the solution?
Read 17 tweets
4 Jul
Blood Types and the Coronavirus
A meta-analysis of Coronavirus patients in Wuhan, China shows a significant variance in blood type of patients vs that of the population in the city. People with type A blood are more likely to be adversely affected by the virus and people with
type O blood less so.…


Type A: 38% positive vs 31% expected, a 23% increase
Type B: 26% positive vs 24% expected, a 8% increase
Type A/B: 10% positive vs 9% expected, an 11% increase
Type 0: 25% positive vs 34% expected, a 26% decrease.
Read 4 tweets
28 Jun
Making decisions (Short Thread)

One day in late Oct, when we were waiting for EOD reports, the head trader swung around and asked,
“How many of you signed up for the supplemental life policy?”
2/3 of us (the older married ones) raised their hand.
He went on,
“Of those with their hands up, how many signed up for the LTD policy?”
Only one hand stayed up.
He said, “If the rest of you think that your family will need the money more when you’re dead than when you’re a cripple in bed for the rest of your life, you’re fucked.”
He turned around and continued,
“I don’t know why I trust you with millions of dollars (PL), when you morons are unable to make such a simple decision “.
I went back to the benefits election form. LTD cost about 1/4 of what the supplemental life did. I clicked it.
Read 6 tweets
15 Jun
Okay. Wanna play?

You are gamma short. Last rehedged at 3042

Futures are down 38 points or 1.25%. Being short gamma makes you long.

Do you think:
1) it’s real, or
2) just HFs pushing it

If 2, do nothing since it’s going to snap back. You saved getting whipsawed. Good job.
If the sells off is real, you had a chance to rebalance and enter the next leg down flat. Instead you chose to be long, magnifying the loss. The idiot model is better than you. You are costing the bank money.

If you think it’s real, is this:
1) as far as it’s going now, or
2) is it going to get creamed?

If 1, hedge up, lock in the loss and move on.
If 2, sell more than you need to and front run the model. If market sells off more as you called, you’ll be making money on gamma trading despite being short gamma. That’s not supposed to happen.
Read 6 tweets
8 Jun
The market makes perfect sense (Thread)

If the market moves to cause the maximum pain to the greatest number, then the market is behaving perfectly. Consider its path:
1) the market had the fastest drop from an ATH into bear market ever seen. Margin accounts sold.
CTAs dumped what they had and got short $380b. The aggressive shorting caused the sharp drops. Many investors panicked as they saw years of gains disappear in weeks. They lightened up or got out so they could hold on to at least some of the gains they had in the last few years.
2) the heavily oversold market bounced lifted by fast money
3) retail joined in buying badly beat up sectors
4) the CTAs saw the quick gains they made on shorting the market begin to disappear and stepped in to cover their shorts pushing the market up further.
Read 6 tweets
5 May
Coronavirus, Trump and the Chinese (Thread)

Trump has made a colossal mess of this pandemic and is now trying to blame it all on the Chinese. The Chinese are at fault for not containing the virus at their own borders and not warning others.
Once the virus escaped China it went all over the world but not at the same time. Once it got to another country, how much damage it did reflects the way that country handled it. Korea and the US got their first case at the same time, on Jan 20th.
Korea began immediate large scale tests, identifying infected persons, tracing their contacts, and isolating people testing positive whether or not they had symptoms.
Read 6 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!

This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!