@EWoodhouse7 1/n How can it be that more people are not absolutely outraged that publicly funded universities such as IU and U of I, among many others, arrogantly display a complete unwillingness to publicly engage
@EWoodhouse7 2/n and defend dangerous totalitarian COVID policies that run directly counter to well established published scientific guidelines?
@EWoodhouse7 3/n They disdainfully ignore any and all questioning of their unilateral imposition of policies involving far-reaching and damaging associated health consequences, serious curtailments of constitutional rights and liberties,
@EWoodhouse7 4/n and questions of privacy rights violations, without full and transparent debate or justification.
@EWoodhouse7 5/n It is absolutely outrageous - in the same vein as myriad politicians unilaterally imposing unjustified restrictions on millions without recourse, while ignoring sound science and civil liberties, and even the rules themselves
@EWoodhouse7 6/n - rules that are to be followed without question or dissent, but only seem to apply to the governed, not to the imperious governing rulers who are sworn supposedly to serve those that elected them and/or pay their salaries.
@EWoodhouse7 1.7 Help. I’m confused. CDC says vaccines don’t prevent transmission but help to mitigate serious illness and death. CDC data show without vaccination only a very tiny fraction of people become seriously ill or die from Covid - especially so for healthy people under 50.
@EWoodhouse7 2.7 CDC and others say there exist ever improving treatments for those becoming ill from Covid.
@EWoodhouse7 3.7 I’m not good at math. Can someone explain the calculus justifying spending $ gazillions having EVERYONE take a vaccine which doesn’t prevent infection but rather TREATS an illness for which the vast majority of people - say, 99+%- is at not ill or at risk of serious illness?
@EWoodhouse7 1/4 If we responded to all disease as we are to covid, downplaying effective treatments and mandating massive assaults on personal freedoms and liberty - lockdowns, mass testing, masks, disinfectants, school, church and business closures, distancing, passports, etc,
@EWoodhouse7 2/4 until a virus with a 99.5% survival rate is “eradicated”, then we long ago would have done the same for cancer, venereal disease, aids, heart disease, car accidents, flu, etc.
@EWoodhouse7 3/4 No one would be allowed to leave their homes ever. We could all just plug into feeding tubes and Netflix until we died. Cigarettes, sex, French fries, alcohol and drugs, cars all would be banned.
@DanCrenshawTX@MZHemingway@aier@jeffreyatucker@ByronYork@zerohedge@Chesschick01 3/n You’d best not take one minute of time or $1 of corp resources away from complete focus on serving customers, hiring and motivating outstanding employees, and building a quality business to produce strong sustainable long term returns. That is your job description. Period.
@realDailyWire 1/n Don’t forget he also stopped seas from rising, ended world hunger and solved nuclear cold fusion, so he’s got that going for him. But he’s not done.
@realDailyWire 2/n He has nearly completed destruction of the most prosperous and successful experiment in democracy ever, which, in its short history, has: saved the world from fascist tyranny multiple times,
@realDailyWire 3/n done more than any nation ever to raise the living standards of hundreds of millions of people here and around the world, helped feed them and lift them out of poverty, freed slaves, educated billions,
@ianmSC 1/n “In the long run my observations have convinced me that some men, reasoning preposterously, first establish some conclusion in their minds which, either because of its being their own or because of their having received it from some person who has their entire confidence,
@ianmSC 2/n “impresses them so deeply that one finds it impossible ever to get it out of their heads. Such arguments in support of their fixed idea as they hit upon themselves or hear set forth by others, no matter how simple and stupid these may be,
@ianmSC 3/n “gain their instant acceptance and applause. On the other hand whatever is brought forward against it, however ingenious and conclusive, they receive with disdain or with hot rage — if indeed it does not make them ill.