A democracy has 2 purposes. In rules agreed upon by the governed, to:
*Protect the security and total well being of its current and future citizens.
*To ensure equal opportunity so all can achieve that well being.
The GOP has failed at this for decades. The reason is simple...1
..they stand for only a transaction: Provide money & power to GOP contributors, who in turn provide money & power back to GOP politicians. That means 2 things: Making sure the rich get richer, exacerbating wealth inequalities, & that business profits are not impeded by social...2
...needs. When I was just as likely to vote for a GOPr as a democrat, I always said, neither side has a monopoly on truth. We have to struggle to find the best policies that achieve our goals as a nation, and the best answer will always be a blend of both. The GOP abandoned...3
...that pact years ago. They are not looking for what works, they are not looking for what makes the country happier, stronger, more advanced. No, it's just money and power. That is why they lie so much, why they suppress so many votes, why they even lie to their supporters...4
...who have yet to see the scam. If GOP policies *worked* I would gladly support them. And by worked, I mean worked to meet the goals in government to protect and improve the lives of the governed. But when "make me rich" is the end game, their policies are not even vaguely...5
...focused on working anymore. I remember when Rush Limbaugh, on the election of Obama, said "I hope he fails." Why? Because he didn't like his policies. But if he succeeded, that means the policies were correct. What is the point of a prior policies if they have no goal...6
...other than assertions of what they mean? The GOP track record is horrific They said:
*1981 tax cuts would pay for themselves. They didnt.
*S&L deregulation would work because of conservative principals. The industry collapsed - dead and gone, at a cost of $500 billion...7
...
*Dems raising taxes in 94 would cause a recession. It balanced the budget and caused an economic boom.
*Intervention in Bosnia would cause massive American death. No one died, the goal was achieved.
*2001 tax cuts would pay for themselves. They didnt....8
...
*Iraq - we would be welcomed as liberators, saying the war would last longer than 12 weeks and more than a billion was insane. We are there 17 years later, at a cost of trillions.
*Iraq had WMDs. It didnt....9
...
*Economic policies from 2003 would grow housing market. It did - by allowing the unchecked growth of mortgage derivatives, leading to the collapse of 2008.
*The 2017 tax cuts would pay for themselves. They didnt.
*Climate change was a joke. It's not...10
...
*Climatologists were absurd to warn of massive storms, huge fires, tornadoes and hurricanes of record size. They were right - yet STILL the GOP wont admit its error.
*Covid would not be a problem. It was and is.
It is not that they are stupid. It is that, when your.../11
...goal has nothing to do with the purpose of government, government will fail. And maybe thats the point.
So now, when I see GOPrs like that @AEI knucklehead say "oh, trump is insane but I have to vote for him because of Fox News policy criticisms" I have to ask: And what../12
...if those policies - even the ones you make up - are the ones that make the country a better, safer, happier and more secure place to live? Are you like Limbaugh and truly only care about *your* policies, and hope that those that you dont like fail? Id be delighted if...13
...tax cuts paid for themselves. But they dont. Id be happy if we could ignore our infrastructure without consequence. But we can't. I'd be happy if acting always in the interests of business made American citizens lives better. But many times, it just makes their lives worse..14
...so, why am I saying this? Because GOPrs who are not sociopaths or racists, who are not solely "gimme money" have to really decide what kind of world you want to leave behind. What about if you are wrong about climate change, just like you were about taxes, debt, and all...15
...the rest? Our children are already looking at the wreckage wreaked by your dedication to policy and not outcome, and they rightfully hate us for it. Your grandchildren will despise you. They will despise everyone in our generation. Deservedly so. I remember all the rich...16
...people going berserk when Clinton raised taxes. Then, almost immediately, the stock market exploded - because *we were getting our fiscal house in order* - and the wealthy got wealthier faster than they had in any time in history. But all they saw was "but my taxes." ...17
...oh, and as for all of the groups that the GOP has cobbled together - white evangelicals, rich, anti-abortion, racists, Fox News addled, and on an on. You are the marks. You are the ones they say the same thing to over & over. But you're just there to get them in office, so..18
...they can get their actual goals: Enrich and empower their contributors, who will enrich and empower the politicians. And they will lie, deceive, impede, and undermine democracy to get it done.
Bottom line: Trump is unbalanced. He is dangerous. Many of you know it...19
...4 years of policy you might not agree with - policy that *might prove to be right in accomplishing the goals of government* - is less of a price than the destruction of this country to death, disease, incompetence and insanity....
...look on 2020 with the wisdom you should have gained in 1994, when the tax increases you raged about gave not only you, but the rest of the country what it wanted, it served the role of government.
Back the democrat. It will work out the best for you, GOPrs.
end
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
With us now learning that Redstone from Paramount is putting pressure on 60 Minutes to trim its journalistic sails to keep Trump happy and help her with a merger, time to tell a story of journalism from another era. This is a story about greatness at the @nytimes. I was....
...conducting a running investigation of the American Express Company, which was engaged in a lot of stuff it shouldn't have been. Some brutal stories upended major deals they were trying to make, etc. I won one of the monthly Publisher's Awards ($500) AO Sulzberger Jr. gave..
...winning for my American Express work. Three months after I finish, my boss comments how much he admired my faith in the paper. I had no idea what he was talking about. "Wait, you don't know?" he asked....
In just three months, Trump has: 1. Wrecked decades-long relationships with USA's best allies, who now have said that relationship is over. 2. Sent global stocks markets into a tailspin. 3. Sent bond markets into collapse. 4. Moved world against dollar as global currency.../1
...5. Lied to courts & refused to abide by rulings, in what could be the greatest breakdown in Constitutional government since founding. 6. Ignored due process before shipping someone to a torture prison. 7. Wistfully discussed his desire to send Americans to torture prisons.../2
...8. Demonstrated, once again, that he is too stupid to understand what tariffs are or how they work. 9. Threatened the independence of the federal reserve. 10. Demanded that the federal government get to determine what private colleges teach. 11. Crippled the FDA, CDC..../3
People looking only at the stock market are missing the full magnitude of Trump's economic incompetence. His "yes-no-maybe" idiocy with tariffs is leaving equity investors with no sense of which way to go. But worse is the bond market..../1
...the near-cliche of markets it that when investors sell stocks, they rush to US bonds. It's a rare time in our history that this standard response does not happen. But...now it's not. The largest holders of our debt are instead scooping up short-term t-bills and gold.../2
...this means that they are losing faith - or certainty - in the US long term economic future. The only way to deal with this is to increase interest rates - thus providing bond investors with higher rewards for taking what they perceive as higher risk..../3
As a German citizen (I hold dual citizenship) Im disgusted by the ignorance of @JDVance & @elonmusk in promoting AfD as if it's a normal party. Perhaps they aren't just ignorant & AfD actually reflects their viewpoints, but there is a reason its founders resigned, the German.../1
...courts have deemed them an extremist organization (which, if you creep 2 far in Germany, can get you banned), why there have been national protests against them, and why the German government's Bundesamt für Verfassungsschutz classified Der Flügel, AfD's far-right faction.../2
whose growth of control of AfD is what led to the resignation of its founders, as "a right-wing extremist endeavor against the free democratic basic order" and as "not compatible with the Basic Law." AfD sued, but a court ruled "there were sufficient factual indications.../3
As someone who has been a journalist for almost 40 year, working as a senior writer at the New York Times, Newsweek, etc, the decision by @WilliamLewis, a Murdoch alum, to cripple the @washingtonpost by abandoning endorsements, is one of the most craven actions I've ever seen../1
...taken in the industry. Make no mistake, this wasn't just cowardice. It was @WilliamLewis and perhaps @JeffBezos dragging a now-once great paper into the sewer because of their own political beliefs. If Lewis et al wanted to abandon endorsements, fine. But you don't do it.../2
@WilliamLewis @JeffBezos ...days one of the most consequential elections in history. We have on one side a convicted felon, deemed an ignorant fascist by his own people, who half this country believes is, in fact, a fascist, and on the other side a woman half the country believes is a communist.../3
Make no mistake: The "Haitians are stealing your pets to eat them" lie is a variant of the blood libel that Jews have faced for centuries: In that, Jews are stealing Christian babies to use their blood bake food (Matzah).
Trump and Vance are lying about legal residents..../1
....accusing them of stealing beloved members of the family, and eating them. The point of the Haitian Blood Libel is the same as the original Blood Libel: To create an "other," to unify the hateful and ignorance against an imaginary enemy in their midst, all to seize power.../2
...so please, stop calling the attack on lawful American residents from Haiti as a "lie." Call it was it is: The #HaitianBloodLibel generated by Trump and Vance. A century ago they would have used Jews. And Fox News would have been the May 1934 volume of Der Stürmer.../3