Today's Congressional hearing on NCAA athlete name, image and likeness rights signals that many coaches and higher education leaders could benefit from a sport law class.

For starters, outside entities compensating NCAA athletes for NIL rights doesn't invoke or violate Title IX.
Arguing that corporations may choose to endorse NCAA athletes over partnering with the entire athletic department is a Chicken Little argument. Athletic departments with strong brands and social media followings will not lose money to the few athletes who can secure endorsements.
Olympic sports will continue to be cut NOT because college athletes can enter into NIL deals, but because athletic departments have grossly mismanaged budgets. Spending on coaches' salaries, facilities and travel are to blame. Not NCAA athletes entering into legal endorsements.
The NCAA generates over $1B in revenue/year. In this tough economy all of its employees will be furloughed for 3 weeks. However, here's what the NCAA spent on legal fees in part to defend its amateurism standard & prevent payment to NCAA athletes:
2019: $54M
2018: $46M
2017: $36M
To put these legal fees into perspective, the NCAA's 2018 Form 990 says it spent $77.7 million on salaries. If I'm a furloughed employee and know that $54 million was spent on legal fees defending amateurism, I'm asking if it's time to reimagine our mission.

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh

Keep Current with Alicia Jessop

Alicia Jessop Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!


Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @RulingSports

10 Aug
As college football players across the U.S. have suddenly banded together in the #WeWantToPlay movement, those calling for widespread unionization of the group must understand that the law governing unionization in the U.S. makes that unlikely. 1/
The National Labor Relations Act was passed in 1935 to provide workers returning to employment after the Great Depression protections. It provides U.S. employees of private employers the right to unionize. Key words: 1. Private employer and 2. employees. 2/
In 2014, Northwestern football players on scholarship filed a petition to unionize. The National Labor Relations Board used the Right to Control test to deem them employees who could vote to unionize. It is notable that this part of the NLRB’s ruling was never overturned. 3/
Read 8 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!

This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!