How is it different from Chavhanke saying Muslims are systematically infiltrating govt machinery through UPSC? Will Supreme Court take suo motu cognizance of Pappu @RahulGandhi's unverified claim against RSS?
https://twitter.com/INCMumbai/status/1123214148559441920
Many on our side & of course morons from other side are saying Pappu didn't name a community. If you see comments by SC, their main contention in stay order is "false claims on age limit/attempts for Muslims". Here Pappu is blurting nonsense without proofs
https://twitter.com/LiveLawIndia/status/1305821600764157957?s=19
So, similarity with Pappu's nonsense against RSS & basis of order on Chavhanke remains false claims to provoke against a group of people. Stick to it. Courts need to be consistent with their judgment. Pappu's case is fit to be prosecuted. Suo motu or otherwise
Taking it further. Hindu side should file cases against every TV, web portal or print report that makes falsifying claims on BJP government undermining institutions, plans to change constitution to make India a Hindu Rashtra. Let the fun begin
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
