“[A]dvocates and defense attorneys said police still focus on the city’s poorer, mostly Black neighborhoods because that’s where officer deployments and investigations of violent crime are concentrated.“
So again: cannabis-related encounters Black folks have with the police are just a pretext for more intrusive questioning and searches.
So for Black folks, weed is a gateway drug...into the criminal justice system.
One of the arguments for legalization is that you protect m a whole bunch of other civil liberties when you don’t arbitrarily prosecute cannabis offenses. it shuts off the rationale for all sorts of unnecessary and potentially catastrophic encounters with the cops.
So of course, the cops and prosecutor don’t want this. They don’t really care about weed per se; they care about anything that might curb their nearly limitless discretion to initiate contact.
So many typos
Even the nomenclature has a racist history: drug warriors in the federal government started calling it “marihuana” [sic] instead of “cannabis” in order to activate the xenophobia that white Americans felt about Mexican immigrants to the US.
In an episode we did about legal cannabis coming online in California, a Black woman who got popped for selling weed in HS could not apply for a license to open a cannabis-related dispensary; licenses were only open to people without felony convictions.
Which is to say: all the Black ppl singled out for arrest + prosecution for weed-related offenses when cannabis was illegal there are disqualified from participating in that economy now that *is* legal.
White people have eliminated their competition in the legit weed market.
And that’s before you get to the other racist shit that keeps Black people and Latinos out of the legal weed business. As a schedule 1 drug, the federal government forbids banks from participating in the weed economy. It’s a cash business.
Which also means: no small biz loans.
you have to come to the table with cash in your pockets.
Hello [Racial Wealth Gap], my old friend.
sweahtagahd this just landed in my inbox:
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Mentioned in passing during the live show tonight that the Chicago Police Dept ran a black site where they disappeared people and afterwards a Black CPD sergeant came up to me and said that wasn’t true and that we should debate it
Just looked him up on the @ChicagoReporter police misconduct settlement database and sure enough: the city settled a lawsuit in which the aforementioned sergeant beat up a Black man at a store for no reason and planted drugs on the man to justify the arrest
Have you ever heard of SLABS? I hadn’t until last night.
it stands for Student Loan Asset-Backed Securities.
it’s exactly what it sounds like:
“There is little public awareness that when student borrowers sign their Master Promissory Notes (affirming that they will repay their loans and “reasonable collection costs”), their debts may be securitized and sold to investors.”
was talking to my gym partner who is moving in with her girlfriend and man. listening to her, i forget how much of healthy cohabitation, especially the early parts, is just overcommunicating. about every. single. fucking. thing.
let's say you say you both want a clean house. okay, that's dope!
but y'all are different people. something like "clean" means v different things — even for people who are objectively very clean people! does that mean a deep clean every Sunday? is everyday laundry day? etc
you may love your boo to death but before you move in together, most of your time together has some intentionality to it. when you live together, you suddenly have to talk through or work out stuff like alone time. or as my lady calls it, Secret Single Behavior.
if you read enough discoursing about crime and policing in big cities #onhere, you'll see lots of people point out that crime is at or near historic lows, and that year-over-year crime jumps are relative to those troughs.
then you'll almost always see someone say in response that bloodless stats are missing the point: who cares what the numbers are if people don't *feel* safer?
and the data show that USians are basically always primed for a moral panic around crime: a majority of people polled said over the last two decades they thought crime was going up or so even though it had been steadily falling.
If you're talking abt Kobe's Black Mamba persona or the hashtag GirlDad memorializing that greeted his death, you're REALLY talking abt a branding switch necessitated by his rape case; league/fan investment in that rebrand was/is so strong that it inflates his greatness
imma mute this bc it's Friday but: one example is Kobe's reputation as clutch, which is wildly disconnected from his actual iffy production. But if you say that, people will invite you to Temecula as if the numbers ain't right there.
Kobe’s numbers across his Finals appearances are either middling or inefficient: