the ultimate reviewer #2 bingo card
key citations 👇
unclear analysis aims
stat.berkeley.edu/~aldous/157/Pa…

evidence of absence fallacy
bmj.com/content/311/70…

data dredging
bmj.com/content/311/70…

noisy data fallacy
science.sciencemag.org/content/355/63…
only apparent predictive performance
journals.lww.com/epidem/Fulltex…

point estimate is the effect


collider
medrxiv.org/content/10.110…

multivariate vs multivariable models
ajph.aphapublications.org/doi/10.2105/AJ…

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Maarten van Smeden

Maarten van Smeden Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @MaartenvSmeden

3 Aug
The BMJ just published an editorial about living systematic reviews worth a read, which is new territory for just about everyone bmj.com/content/370/bm…

ICYI, I have a few thoughts to share
We were fortunate to have produced @bmj_latest first living review
bmj.com/content/369/bm…
The aim of our review is (and always was) to give an overview and appraisal of currently available diagnosis and prognosis models related to COVID-19

But this is a fast moving field: from 31 models reviewed in April to 145 models reviewed in our 2nd update published in July
Read 14 tweets
11 Jul
Used to get annoyed by stats consult clients who insisted they needed machine learning for their very large dataset (N of 100s or few 1000s). Now I tell them logistic regression *is* machine learning and everything is great again
And since machine learning is a sub field of AI, logistic regression is also AI. I should have understood this sooner
Logistic regression as statistical model
- prepare data
- estimate model
- evaluate performance
- report

Logistic regression as machine learning
- prepare data
- estimate model
- evaluate performance
- report
Read 4 tweets
9 Jun
Was asked for personal favorite resources for improving methods and statistics skills. I promised to make it a thread, so here it is

1/n
I work in medical research, so that is going to be my focus here too. But I’d like to think the resources are relevant to a wider audience

This list should not be taken as a guide to become a statistician, nor is it a must-read list for all academics (obviously)

2/n
My personal view is that medical research would benefit from involving trained statisticians earlier and more frequently; not from everyone trying to become one

Here are some good arguments by @statsepi:
medium.com/@darren_dahly/…

And some more: medium.com/@darren_dahly/…

3/n
Read 20 tweets
19 May
The definitive guide to COVID-19 prognosis modeling success

1) Do not explain where the data come from (country) or when (study dates) they were obtained. Do not specify inclusion or exclusion criteria
2) Do not define a target group. Talk generically about COVID-19 patients, do not define how they were recruited
3) Do not provide a table with patient characteristics. In particular, do not mention use of medication or co-morbidities
Read 18 tweets
13 Apr
Let's talk about the "risk factors" for COVID-19 for a moment

1/n
We talk about risk factors all the time. Not just in the medical scientific literature: you will find risk factors being discussed in the popular media and on social media too

Exhibit A: nytimes.com/reuters/2020/0…

2/n
The term "risk factor" is popular in medical research. It has been used in literature since at least the 1950s

BUT definitions for what a risk factor really is or should be varies. As this article argues quite convincingly bmj.com/content/355/bm…

3/n
Read 15 tweets
7 Apr
Our NEW systematic review article about diagnosis and prognosis models related to COVID-19 is out now in @bmj_latest

bmj.com/content/369/bm…

📢 This review will be regularly updated in the coming months. Watch this space📢

1/n
TL;DR
The evidence base for COVID-19 related diagnosis and prognosis models is weak and reporting quality is generally poor: we can and should do better

We will continue our critical appraisals of new models when they appear in the coming months

2/n
What we did
Systematically reviewed and critically appraised articles (including preprints) of COVID-19 related diagnosis and prognosis models developed for individual level predictions

Models to forecast the spread of the COVID-19 infection are not part of this review

3/n
Read 12 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!