On this "the EU acted in bad faith" point.

The EU was never the question mark in these negotiations.

We've seen the EU negotiate FTAs time after time. We've seen EU FTA neogiations breaking down because the demands were too high/will to compromise was too low

We've known what EU's 3rd country rules and obligations were since before the referendum. All of this was obvious. Painfully obvious.

The EU 3rd country rules, whether it's export procedures (exist summary decl) or SPS rules, were the rules we applied to 3rd countries as a member of the EU.

Yes, somehow, these are the rules that ended surprising our Gov.

And this is what I don't get.

How can you claim that the EU is acting in bad faith when it's doing everything we knew it would do?

We're literally crying foul because the EU is playing by the rules that we've known about for years.

Are we surprised that they are tough negotiators unwilling to make far reaching concessions in return for very little?


• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh

Keep Current with Dr Anna Jerzewska

Dr Anna Jerzewska Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!


Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @AnnaJerzewska

16 Sep
This seems obvious but clearly still needs repeating. No country can "promise", give or grant an FTA to another country.

That's not how it works. Countries neogitiate an FTA together and reach a deal provided that both sides are happy with the conditions

The reason behind it should please a lot of avid Brexiteers - countries negotiating an FTA are sovereign countries with independent trade policy.

As such, the EU and the UK did not "promise" to grant each other an FTA.
They promise to enter into negotiations. And within these negotiations, it is completely normal and understandable that each side looks out for its own interests.

Read 7 tweets
3 Sep
Interesting. By @Joe_Mayes (h/t @JohnHol32019188)

A couple of questions on this. First one - why is the Gov always the last to find out that these plans are unrealistic?


Who looks at plans that include up to 10 new IT systems, most of which don't yet exist, and thinks - yeah 9/6/3 months sounds about right?

Especially with given the whole CDS debacle

Regarding duplication. That was something I've been wondering about since the BOM was published. If we don't have time to finish GVMS to be ready for 1 Jan - why are we planning to design a new app as a fallback measure?

Read 6 tweets
8 Aug
🚨Update on the Trader Support Service, the new IT system for NI – turns out it won't be “fully digital and streamlined” (who knew...)

I initially thought this will be an attempt to create an automated customs system.

For example, the trader enters the description of the product and the system tries to provide a product code lookup.

Seems it’s not quite that.

On one hand, there is a bit less of a need for new, non-existing tech, on the other this comes with its own challenges

Read 8 tweets
7 Aug
🚨On the NI announcement🚨

First of all, this is not the border operating model we've been waiting for. This is yet another new IT system that will supposedly take care of customs formalities on behalf of biz- but don’t get too excited


It’s good news in principle, at least for NI biz (not so much for GB biz selling to NI- so far more bad news for them).

Just as with all recent announcements, the main question is HOW?

Two main regarding this announcement.

1⃣ one - the automation of the customs process

Read 13 tweets
4 Aug
🚛🚛🚛 Operation Brock is back

One of the least popular elements of nodeal prep last time around.

This wasn't so much "shelved" last time as dismantled overnight due to being very unpopular and apparently leading to accidents


I'm somewhat confused by this.

Some form of traffic management will be needed whether we have a deal or not. Disruptions may occur even if we get a last-minute deal.

GVMS, the new traffic management app was supposed to sort that out - only the trucks with permission would be heading towards the port. Via the system, the authorities would have some level of control over the incoming traffic.

Read 7 tweets
19 Jul
Yeah it is. But it really should come as no surprise. We’ve been talking about it for years. Indulge me for a few minutes while I give you a quick backstory.

And H/t @pendletongs who tweeted about the Amazon announcement a few days ago

Two reasons behind this announcement:

1⃣ (obviously!) Brexit and the introduction of customs formalities between the UK and the EU, and

2⃣ the removal of the low-value consignment relief which is an import VAT relief for low-value parcels.

We've known about both of these for years

Read 15 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!

This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!