Richard Keen, the 4th ever & 1st Tory Advocate General for Scotland, has resigned over Tory plans to break the law. This is a big development - a sign of breakdown in the UK constitution. But what is the Advocate General for Scotland & why does it matter? #LongThread! #skotia
The AG, a UK Government legal officer, has significant influence over the limits of devolution & what legislation can be passed in Scotland. This is a key consequence of the Scotland Act 1998. The AG can challenge legislation in the courts, which can lead to it being struck down.
The AG also communicates devolution & Scots law matters to UK Government departments. Separately the AG represents the UK Government as respondent in Scottish court cases, for instance in the Wightman Brexit case and Cherry prorogation case.
The Scotland Act gives the AG considerable power. Section 33 states the AG can refer any Holyrood Bill to the UK Supreme Court in the 4 weeks after its passed by Holyrood. In that time it can’t become law - so the AG can block (at least delay) legislation passed by Parliament.
A reference to UK Supreme Court is costly & time consuming. If a reference is upheld, then legislation (or part outwith competence) cannot become law. So the AG’s can delay, & if they win support of the court, veto Scottish legislation. No such restriction applies to Westminster.
To avoid this @ScotGov work with the AG to avoid a court challenge - they give AG a ‘note on legislative competence’ before Bills are even introduced at Holyrood. This seeks agreement that it's within Holyrood’s powers. It can mean Bills are changed at the behest of the AG.
Politics impacts the AG's role. A Labour Executive + Labour AG was uncomplicated. (1997-2007) Even with the 2010-15 coalition, Jim Wallace (Liberal) was AG & as a former Deputy First Minister he got & supported devolution. But now legal/constitution relationship is more fraught.
Brexit & Tory majority rule has led to tension. In 2018 AG challenged Holyrood legislation for the 1st time. The Brexit Continuity Bill, passed by Scotland’s Parliament, was then undermined with a retrospective amendment to the Scotland Act. We’re in a new era of legal conflict.
In political terms this was huge. The Tory Government, without electoral support in Scotland, had sabotaged democratically endorsed legislation at Holyrood for the 1st time. And they did it to force through Brexit - which was also rejected in Scotland. The AG was key to this.
With the 'Internal Market’ power grab, another Holyrood Brexit Bill, & the UKGov refusing to cooperate on a future independence referendum, more issues of legal friction are undoubtedly ahead for Scotland & devolution. The AG, appointed by Downing Street, will play a key role.
Keen’s resignation is in this context. Downing Street’s aversion to devolution & rule of law couldn’t be reconciled with being an ‘officer of the court’. Given surge in support for independence, it's symbolic that it's the UK's Scottish legal officer that couldn’t bear it anyone.
Anyone interested in political progress for Scotland should reflect on this. It's crucial. Why does the AG have so much power & influence over what the Scottish Parliament can do? Why does hardly anyone know or understand this process? How can we change it? I have ideas & plans..
A big part is with @TheSkotia. On our Patreon I’m publishing a monthly episode on ‘Controlling Scotland: the legal limits of devolution’. So if you found this interesting, please support us there & you’ll get far more like it in the months ahead!

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh

Keep Current with Michael Gray

Michael Gray Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!


Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @GrayInGlasgow

7 Jul
Craig Murray (@CraigMurrayOrg), ex-UK Ambassador, whistleblower, now political activist, faces court in Edinburgh this morning over contempt of court charges relating to articles & comments on the trial of former First Minister Alex Salmond. I'll be reporting what happens.
The Crown alleged in its April 21 petition that Mr Murray committed Contempt of Court at common law, under the Contempt of Court Act 1981, & breached relevant judicial reporting orders. Maximum sentence is 2 years imprisonment. (Section 15(2) 1981 Act)
For an accessible intro to Contempt of Court in Scottish criminal law, @PeatWorrier’s 20 minute podcast provides a great & entertaining explanation. Goes through case law (includes nudity & drunkenness in the court room!), strict liability, & defences.…
Read 12 tweets
20 May
In a few hours the SNP will again reject controlling private sector rents, even though it’s party policy. This will cause more confusion & anger. I’ve been following & writing about the rent controls campaign over 5 years. Here’s why:
.@ScotGov civil service & lawyers do not back major changes without long consultation. This hasn’t been initiated. Opposition MSPs called for emergency action on rents 50 days ago. But there’s been no substantive response or discussions. So SNP will whip against opposition plans.
Rent controls were passed unanimously at SNP Spring Conference 2016, but with no serious plan to deliver them. I asked First Minister’s chief spokesperson in person at the time. It wasn’t on the agenda. They claimed the Housing (Tenancies) (S) Act 2016 did the job. It wouldn’t.
Read 10 tweets
28 Apr
When I asked the Ministry of Defence how many people had died in their (our?) latest bombing campaign they replied: "What do you mean by people?" The idea of counting the people we were killing didn't make sense to them.
Quantifying death carnage of Afghanistan, Iraq, Libya, Syria is an impossible task, the rounding of mass graves. I asked as they claimed "no civilians" were being killed - a total fabrication. Let's not pretend our government doesn't cover up mass murder for political purposes.
When Kunduz hospital was bombed, Intensive Care patients burned to death in their beds. Medics were decapitated by shrapnel. Those fleeing were shot dead. $6,000 was given to families of the dead for the "error".
Read 4 tweets
18 Oct 19
Back in Court of Session. Case before Lord Pentland by @JolyonMaugham claiming interdict against UK Ministers on grounds that the proposed Brexit Withdrawal Agreement breaches existing law on the customs status of Northern Ireland.
Aidan O’Neill QC appearing for petitioner. Will speak for 1 hour 30. Begins by stating that petition anticipated the contents of the Withdrawal Agreement - and was largely correct. Claims it breaches section 55 of Taxation (Cross border Trade) Act 2018 on Northern Ireland.
O’Neill: There is not yet an Agreement under EU Law - at it is not passed by the European Parliament as required. So this remains a live legal issue.
Read 30 tweets
8 Oct 19
It’s #NobOff day! Aka the Nobile Officium of the Court of Session - extraordinary jurisdiction that petitioners want to apply to sending Brexit extension letter if Boris Johnson doesn’t. Case expected all day.
3 judges enter (Drummond Young, Menzies, Turnbull). Court commenced. Aidan O’Neill QC rises for the petitioners - begins on issue of appeal to Lord Pentland’s decision in the Outer House of the Court of Session yesterday.
O’Neill pinpoints the issue of ‘undertakings’ (promises) made by the UKGovernment lawyers to the Court that the letter to extend Brexit would be sent, as the key issue for an appeal.
Read 74 tweets
4 Oct 19
Court returns. O’Neill rises to continue the case for the petitioners, that action should be taken to ensure Boris Johnson abides by the law passed by Parliament on Brexit.
O’Neill submits transcript of the Andrew Marr show, various interviews, & BJ’s Tory conference speech all asserting that UK will leave the EU on 31 Oct irrespective of the law passed by Parliament. This, he says, demonstrates his willingness to break the law.
Andrew Webster QC rises for the respondents, the UK Government acting for Boris Johnson as Prime Minister.
Read 30 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!

This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!