Thread: This tweet prompts a discussion.
What is sedition, legally?…
Note that the word “force” appears four times in the text. Force is central to a conviction under 18 U.S. Code § 2384. Seditious conspiracy. Without being able to prove that force was used, a conviction for sedition fails. Have the protesters used force? Of course they have.
So, convicting them would not be hindered by the failure to prove that element of the offense. But what about @Shem_infinite’s question?
@Shem_Infinite Have the intelligence officials that tried to overthrow Trump use force? No. So, charging them with seditious conspiracy would fail, because the element of force cannot be proven. But what about treason? Surely they can be charged with treason?
@Shem_Infinite Whenever you seek to convict someone of a violation of criminal laws, you have to prove each and every element of the offense. Did the coup plotters levy war against America? No, not in the legal sense. Did they adhere to America’s enemies? Arguably no.
@Shem_Infinite I suppose you could make a case that they collaborated with Russia, but that would be difficult to prove in court. So, despite the hopes and dreams of many Americans, no coup plotter is going to be charged with treason or sedition, because the elements cannot be proven.
@Shem_Infinite They also will not be charged with misprision of treason because no one will be charged with treason.…
@Shem_Infinite What about 18 U.S. Code § 2385. Advocating overthrow of Government?… Again, it requires the use of force. The coup plotters didn’t use force. They used deceit, subterfuge, conspiracy, falsification of official records, misuse of office, etc. but not force.
@Shem_Infinite Naturally, patriots want to know what the coup plotters COULD be charged with. Here’s a few:
18 U.S. Code § 372. Conspiracy to impede or injure officer…
@Shem_Infinite 18 U.S. Code § 371. Conspiracy to commit offense or to defraud United States…
@Shem_Infinite 18 U.S. Code § 798. Disclosure of classified information…
@Shem_Infinite 18 U.S. Code § 1031. Major fraud against the United States…
@Shem_Infinite 18 U.S. Code § 1918. Disloyalty and asserting the right to strike against the Government…
@Shem_Infinite 18 U.S. Code § 1924. Unauthorized removal and retention of classified documents or material…
@Shem_Infinite 18 U.S. Code § 2511. Interception and disclosure of wire, oral, or electronic communications prohibited…
@Shem_Infinite I could go on, but you get the idea. There are plenty of crimes that were committed that could put the coup plotters away for a long time. We don’t need to charge them with treason or sedition, crimes for which they would probably not be found guilty.
@Shem_Infinite Addendum: This document released by the FISA court points to some very real consequences for the coup plotters.…

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh

Keep Current with Parler: @PaulSchmehl #StandWithPolice

Parler: @PaulSchmehl #StandWithPolice Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!


Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @PaulSchmehl

24 Sep
Thread: @SidneyPowell1 has filed a bombshell supplement in support of dismissal.…
@SidneyPowell1 There’s no way to describe this other than to simply copy and paste what’s in it, but you can just as easily read it yourself. Suffice it to say that the information revealed in this supplement exposes the FBI in a way that could be very embarrassing.
@SidneyPowell1 “Late last night, the Government produced yet another tranche of documents—its fifth production of exculpatory evidence since April of 2020, and its third since filing its massive Motion to Dismiss. ECF Nos. 198, 231, 237”

The information is stunning.
Read 10 tweets
24 Sep
Thread: When @atensnut tweeted this, she expressed the frustration of millions of Americans, including me.
@atensnut The reason Americans are frustrated is two-fold. First, they see very little being done to stop the riots in many places. People are arrested, released on bail, and return to riot the following night. It’s an unending cycle with no apparent resolution.
@atensnut Law-abiding citizens see it as an affront to our nation. We’re supposed to be a nation of laws. Yet, lately, it seems the law is most often honored in its breech. And it’s a reminder of our two-tiered “justice” system where leftists can do anything they want without consequences.
Read 12 tweets
24 Sep
Thread: I’m so tired of political hypocrisy. Never was it more obvious than in the RBG situation. Both sides have obviously flipped their arguments completely. It makes both sides look petty and venal. The proper argument THEN is the same argument NOW.
When Merrick Garland was nominated, as was appropriate for the President to do, the Republican’s argument was, we should wait for the people to decide who the President will be. That was a bogus argument THEN and it’s a bogus argument NOW.
The correct argument THEN is the same argument NOW. The President nominates. The Senate confirms. When Obama nominated Garland, Mitch McConnell SHOULD have said, we are not going to confirm his nominee. Period. Because Mitch said, let the people decide, we are where we are now.
Read 6 tweets
22 Sep
Hey .@TwitterSupport, .@Jack, do your rules include you not even having to tell someone WHY you blocked their account? You blocked mine and gave me NO reason at all, and didn't respond to my appeal except to tell me you were looking at it.
Notice how you never told me WHAT rule I violated or WHAT tweet violated your rules? Specifically for WHAT?
You didn't tell me in email. You didn't tell me on the web. You didn't tell me when I appealed. How in the world am I supposed to follow your rules if you won't even tell me WHAT rule I have violated?
Read 4 tweets
19 Sep
Thread: Saturday evening Bible thread Our best friend is fighting cancer right now. This is her second time. She had lung cancer and beat it. Now she has a brain tumor and tumors on her lung and kidney as well as lymph node involvement.
From a sense knowledge viewpoint, this is terrifying. But, we don’t operate with sense knowledge. We’re Christians. So, we turn to God for help. I’ve been praying a lot lately. Not just in the way that many of you think, by speaking words and asking God for healing.
I’ve also been speaking in tongues a lot more, focusing on her, and others that I care about. This is a topic that can be very controversial. Many people believe that the powers that were acted upon in the first century are no longer available.
Read 19 tweets
12 Sep
Thread: Saturday evening Bible thread
If there’s one thing we know about prayer, it’s that God answers it, right? There are SO many Bible verses that tell us that. It’s not even a question to a believer. The answer is easily and always, of course.
Just to be sure, let’s look at just a few.

Matthew 7:7

“Ask, and it will be given to you; seek, and you will find; knock, and it will be opened to you.”

John 16:24

“Until now you have asked for nothing in My name; ask and you will receive, so that your joy may be made full.”
James 1:5

“But if any of you lacks wisdom, let him ask of God, who gives to all generously and without reproach, and it will be given to him.”

Job 22:27

“You will pray to Him, and He will hear you; And you will pay your vows.”
Read 11 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!

This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!