scientism Profile picture
Sep 16, 2020 5 tweets 1 min read Read on X
The idea that America ‘has no culture’ and that it’s culture is merely the result of commercialism or naturally-occurring hedonism is employed to mask the sheer quantity of violence and coercion it has taken to spread that culture worldwide.
The presence of American culture is often taken to be the mark of freedom in other countries. “Before the authoritarians came, people were listening to American music and wearing American style dress and observing American mores.“ Because what else would free people do?
‘Freedom‘, then, merely means creating the kind of environment where American corporations and media can dominate. Free trade, free markets, the free press, etc, are all legal constructs that favor large American incumbents over local suppliers of goods and services.
The ‘democratic‘ ideal is related. It will be American NGOs and foundations and media behind large, well-funded activist groups and they will be pushing ideals that further entrench American dominance. This is just another avenue for exercising power abroad.
The American political system acted as an incubator for America’s unique brand of imperialism. The federal government has always had to act through private sector proxies and use astroturfed political activism in order to bring states into line. This was simply extended abroad.

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with scientism

scientism Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @mr_scientism

Jul 15
Electrification is a more important technological ‘race’ than AI, since all modern technology is basically just combinations of batteries, motors, sensors, actuators, etc. But it’s also not really a race since China has such a huge lead.
It’s also an excellent example of contrasting governance. It’s still impossible to discuss electrification in the West due to its polarization into two equally stupid political positions, whereas China just realized it was the next round of industrial upgrade and got on with it.
Concentrating on LLMs makes ’economic sense’ for the US, since it wants to dominate services among its ‘developed world’ allies - being a ‘service economy’ - but it doesn’t make civilizational sense in the context of the massive industrial transition that’s underway.
Read 4 tweets
Feb 5
The conservative idea is that 'wokeness' is not regular liberalism but rather a 'communist plot' because it has 'authoritarian elements'. They place all 'authoritarianism' on the left, which is why they think the Nazis were leftist. They do this because they are liberals.
The reality is that liberalism has always been as 'authoritarian' as every other system, because there is simply no such thing as 'not being authoritarian' as liberals imagine it. Every rights movements has had the very same top-down, 'authoritarian' structure.
The US is a party-state run by a sprawling interconnected network of public and privately funded institutions that control every aspect of society and culture. It functions like a 'totalitarian' state, it just hides behind obscurantist propaganda about 'freedom and democracy'.
Read 4 tweets
Jun 30, 2024
People who oppose the current US (and Western) political and economic order, for whatever reason, often don’t fully update their views on foreign policy, imagining that a new order would have the same goals, enemies, etc.
US foreign policy is a product of its economic order. The US seeks to impose a particular LEGAL order on the world, because that’s how it generates income. This gives its foreign policy certain peculiar characteristics, such as unlimited scope and a tendency to ‘leapfrog’.
Since the goal is to extract rent from the economic activity of others, US foreign policy does not limit itself to a particular geographic domain, it does not distinguish between ‘near’ and ‘far’. Every conflict, regardless of location, is relevant to its goals.
Read 6 tweets
Sep 19, 2023
If you look at war economies as the norm and consumerism as an attempt to sustain the economy in peacetime, the problem with consumerism becomes obvious: it has no objective measure of progress.
Most of our economic institutions and stats were created for fighting wars but they're incomplete. War provides many objective measures of progress: the front, consumption of materiel, weapons testing, etc, so this is not a problem. It becomes a huge problem in peacetime.
The problem is that consumer preferences can be changed through marketing, etc. The economy - according to our stats, at least - can be booming, while industry is declining. In the absence of war, we only have the economic stats and nobody knows how bad things are, materially.
Read 11 tweets
Aug 3, 2023
Liberal democracy is essentially a coalition of conservative movements that form a united bulwark against genuine modernity. Its ‘progressive‘ credentials come from incorporating foreign movements (‘multiculturalism’) and subcultures (LGBT, etc). But they’re all anti-modern.
Genuine modernity would simply accept that political arrangements are arbitrary and that language and culture are artifice and of purely instrumental worth. Liberal democracy is just a collection of groups that oppose this for whatever reason. An anti-modern coalition.
A lot of confusion around the nature of feminism, anti-racist movements, LGBT, etc, comes from the fact that conservatives don’t understand them as fellow conservative movements and therefore don’t understand why they’re concerned with history rather than mere ‘equal treatment’.
Read 4 tweets
Jul 30, 2023
Social theorists massively overestimate the role of conflict and competition in people's lives. Our lives are overwhelmingly dictated by routine and we very rarely engage in conflict or even competition of any kind.
Even when we do engage in competition it's highly constrained. For example, when competing for jobs or other positions, we generally don't even know who we're competing against or have any ability to affect them.
The experience of 'market competition' over resources is for individuals also much like this. We don't know who we're competing against or have any way to alter their chances. You just have to have the money and show up at the right time to get whatever is in limited supply.
Read 4 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us!

:(