Share this page!

Enter URL or ID to Unroll

You can paste full URL like: https://x.com/threadreaderapp/status/1644127596119195649
or just the ID like: 1644127596119195649

How to get URL link on X (Twitter) App

  1. On the Twitter thread, click on or icon on the bottom
  2. Click again on or Share Via icon
  3. Click on Copy Link to Tweet
  4. Paste it above and click "Unroll Thread"!
  5. More info at Twitter Help
Dr. Khalid PhD 🇧🇳☪️ (Archived) Profile picture
@TuuBiiSan
Sep 16, 2020 • 10 tweets • 6 min read • Read on X
<thread 🧵>

Thread on how atheism causes higher crime rates.
Numerous scientific evidence has shown that atheists commit more crimes and have higher per-capita crime rates.

A meta-analysis shows that atheism increases crime rates in children and young adults.

It's also scientifically proven a lack of religion results in higher rates of drug abuse.

And higher religiosity results in lower rates of drug abuse.

In a similar study it's also found that atheism causes higher rates of drug trafficking, as well as theft.

This should explain why crimes like drugs & stealing are virtually non-existent in Islamic nations, yet so high in the West.

journals.sagepub.com/doi/abs/10.117…
Saudi Arabia and Muslim countries in general have very low rates of crime, because Sharia is more effective at reducing crime rates (due to less atheism).

This is explained by the Theory of Synnomie (as opposed to anomie, a breakdown of society which is caused by atheism)

When a society is 100% Islamic, i.e has achieved a state of synnomie, it will have virtually no crime.

tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.108…
In fact when criminals convert to Islam, they end up having lower rates of committing crimes and become more law abiding citizens.

An explanation for why atheism causes higher crime rates is that atheism has no morals

An example of a crime was given:

"An atheist put on a condom then committed bestiality with a chicken, then cleaned & ate the chicken"

Atheists agreed this was okay

journals.plos.org/plosone/articl…
Another scientific studies also confirmed that atheism has no morals, and do not see a problem with committing immoral crimes.

Religious fundamentalists also see committing any type of crime as more serious offenses than who who were not religious.

onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.111…
As John Locke, the Father of the Enlightenment said "atheism is a crime" and an atheist has no logical reason to follow the laws, and will not.

Now we have empirical scientific evidence that atheism does indeed cause higher crime rates.

jstor.org/stable/26225825

</thread>

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
　

Keep Current with Dr. Khalid PhD 🇧🇳☪️ (Archived)

Dr. Khalid PhD 🇧🇳☪️ (Archived) Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @TuuBiiSan

Dr. Khalid PhD 🇧🇳☪️ (Archived) Profile picture
Jan 1, 2021
I noticed an interesting flaw with atheism

Atheism is against brother-sister incest if it results in a baby (due to genetic illnesses/defects)

However atheism is for brother-sister incest if they use a condom/birth control to not have a baby

theguardian.com/world/2007/feb…

1/5
Jürgen Kunze, professor of human genetics says:

"When siblings have a child together, there is only a 50% chance that it will be healthy when it is born"

So would atheism support brother-sister incest if it could be proven their child was in the 50% of healthy babies?

2/5
Or going even further,

a) if they couple kept getting abortions until they got a healthy baby

b) if in the future technology existed to remove all genetic illnesses from incest babies

Would atheism then support incest in these cases?

3/5
Read 5 tweets
Dr. Khalid PhD 🇧🇳☪️ (Archived) Profile picture
Dec 6, 2020
<thread 🧵>

A thread debunking the feminist myth that what you wear doesn't matter, and clothing doesn't prevent sexual harassments. (Proven with scientific studies on the topic)

Short summary: Yes the hijab does prevent sexual harassments and attracts less male attention ImageImage
Scientific studies have shown women are aware of the sexual signals their clothing sends:

1- Women who wore immodest clothing did so in order to flirt with strangers.

2- Women who wore sexual clothing did so in order to have sex with strangers.

tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.108… ImageImageImage
More scientific studies confirm these findings, and have also shown women who wear immodest or sexual clothing self-objectify themselves, which cause anxiety, unhappiness, body-dissatisfaction, and body shame.

link.springer.com/article/10.118… ImageImageImage
Read 25 tweets
Dr. Khalid PhD 🇧🇳☪️ (Archived) Profile picture
Oct 21, 2020
<thread 🧵>

Why atheists have sex with dogs - (explained from the point of view of atheism as to accurately represent atheist voices)

A thread exposing atheism, & why normal people will never accept atheism (proven with scientific papers)
You might have seen this video of a PhD atheist philosopher promoting bestiality as a human right

It's not surprising, many sexual orientations were persecuted a decade ago, & this is the next new sexual orientation that secular atheism wants to liberate

Bestiality in atheism goes back to the French Revolution.

Back then secular atheists used to commit public acts of bestiality to protest against religion

Source: Miletski, H., 2005. A history of bestiality. Anthrozoos-Journal of the International Society for Anthrozoology
Read 10 tweets
Dr. Khalid PhD 🇧🇳☪️ (Archived) Profile picture
Oct 14, 2020
<thread 🧵>

The Incoherence of atheism: Part 1: How atheism Contradicts Itself

A series of threads on how atheism in of itself does not make logical sense, and can only be explained as irrational.
atheists deny religion solely on their misotheistic feelings, yet do not deny other forms of ideologies.

Religion after all is just another kind of ideology, no different than political ideologies (which many atheist basically worship as their neo-god)
For example lets compare religion to liberalism:

In religion there is "blasphemy", "heresy"

In liberalism/atheism/secularism they have "hate speech", "home/trains-phobia", "TERF" etc...

Just another noun to describe the same thing: "anything that offends"
Read 13 tweets
Dr. Khalid PhD 🇧🇳☪️ (Archived) Profile picture
Aug 14, 2020
<small thread 🧵>

A short explanation of this paper (so any of you using it don't misinterpret it and make a mistake) :

1st - The green (puberty) and pink (psycho-social maturity) bars are NOT intrinsically matched to each other.

They don't have to match.
2nd - basically if everyone had unlimited food & no diseases (i.e no evolutionary pressure) then everyone would hit puberty at 9 (green bar)

Age of puberty was higher in places like medieval Europe because they had less food, thus it was a disadvantage to have kids at 9
2nd cont. - today this is no longer the case due to the Industrial Revolution and thus increased food production (why the green bar is lower today)

Nor was this the case at more temperate latitudes which had better food production (more sunlight = faster food production)
Read 8 tweets
Dr. Khalid PhD 🇧🇳☪️ (Archived) Profile picture
Jul 19, 2020
<thread 🧵>

A thread on the fake-history book titled "The Myth of the Andalusian Paradise" by Darío Fernández-Morera.

This is a book used by many anti-Islam groups, but is actually just revisionist conspiracies.

Sources:

a) routledge.com/Far-Right-Revi…

b) muse.jhu.edu/article/712802… Image
The first thing that you should know is that this book is not published by any actual academic publishers, e.g OUP, Routledge, Palgrave Macmillan, Brill, Sage etc...

But instead Dario decided to go with a organization on the same tier as Alex Jones' Infowars.

(Pearce, pg 33) Image
DFM likes to talk a lot about "primary sources"

Since he cannot read the primary sources, he cites secondary sources & translations.

Even going as far to ignore sources that disprove him, and then lie that he "provided his reader all the known evidence" ImageImageImage
Read 6 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!

This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us!

Send Email!

:(