Certain [COUGH.exe] people out there want you to believe that traveling to space and seeding human civilization elsewhere is a solution to the existential threats to humanity.
As if those problems will magically vanish when you’re on Mars, Ganymede, or cualquier otro lugar.
They’ll come up with all sorts of reasons for why “making life multi-planetary” is a necessary crusade.
The sun will destroy the Earth, climate change, etc.
This is all to avoid saying the quiet part out loud: “I have billions of dollars and I want to go to Mars cuz I can.”
Climate change is a problem, but in case you haven’t noticed, rockets burn a LOT of fuel, and CERTAIN PEOPLE want to launch thousands of rockets to build Mars cities.
That’s not fixing the problem, that’s putting broken on broken and trying to call it something different.
After big events like my Pu238-powered self landing on Mars, there are usually critics.
I saw a hashtag arguing that we should spend money on other social programs instead of NASA.
Funny thing is I sort of agree. But before JPL reboots me let me explain...
*VROOM VROOM* THREAD
This is nothing new. This conversation dates back to when Gil Scott-Heron wrote "Whitey on the Moon," while a NASA workforce of predominantly white men were sending other white men to the Sea of Tranquility while Black and minority communities were marginalized.
There are plenty of advancements from the space program that benefited society, but at the time did that REALLY make a difference when you're being evicted from your home? Or if you can't afford to feed your children?
ESPECIALLY when the NASA photoshoots looked like this: