1/Until now, there has been no "easy way to ask" whether primary care providers feel ready to manage pain and opioid use disorder- That ends today, thanks to my collaborator Dr. @AllysonVarley, whose paper offers a 10-item survey: CAP-POD journals.sagepub.com/doi/full/10.11…
2/Combining qualitative & quantitative work, Dr. Varley & team (me included) derived a 10-item survey assessing primary care providers' self-rated
*desire to treat pain OR opioid use
*ability to assess risk
*trust in evidence
*patient's access to recommended therapies!
3/One use for a survey like this is to help health systems or payers *assess clinicians' readiness to adopt a systems-change to pain or OUD care*.
That matters because MOST changes in this space have failed, full-stop, to assess clinicians' capacity to participate in the change
4/One other concerning finding will resonate with patients and payers:Participating primary care providers had LOWER "Desire to treat" (either pain or OUD) & LOWER confidence in "Patient Access" to needed services, and higher "Trust in Evidence" & capacity in "Assessing Risk"
5/Hats off to a full team of coinvestigators at @UAB and @cappi_uab . And especially my colleague and collaborator @AllysonVarley
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
1/A petition has been filed with the FDA, asking it to assess whether the "Narxcare" algorithm, which is part of prescription drug monitoring programs, should be regulated as a medical device.
FDA has rules, ones that suggest the petitioners are correct, and I signed this one
2/The Narxcare algorithm is a proprietary calculation that purports to capture overdose risk.
When docs check prescription drug monitoring programs, the score appears prominently at the top of the report, as if it should influence the prescribing decision.
3/Next Tuesday, our "On Becoming a Healer" podcast will be all about the study of how prescription drug monitoring programs influence health professionals. Special guest: @Liz_Chiarello She wrote a whole book on it!
🧵1/Our @uabmedicine Grand Rounds will feature a diagnostic showdown between Dr Martin Rodriguez and ChatGPT4
I am scared here because I don’t want AI to win
2/the case features behavioral changes, swearing, cognitive decline, cough, progressive weakness over 3 years.
I wonder about infectious and rheumatic disorders. Maybe primary neurological
Aspirations after a cognitive change is possible
Dr Rodriguez opens. Not much to go on.
3/ChatGPT generated a lot of text read by Dr Kraemer but it is pretty good, with emphasis on neurological disorders followed by a disclaimer “please note that this does not substitute for professional medical advice”. Both want more information
Truth💣 1/ The “NARXCare” opioid Rx risk algorithm is in all Prescription Monitoring Databases,ie ~1 bn Rx’s/year
NOW in @JournalGIM
✅evidence does not yet exist to support it as safe or protective
✅It has flourished due to lack of federal oversight link.springer.com/article/10.100…
2/The authors, led by Dr Michele Buonara, review the core argument as one in which this algorithm with low evidence to its favor
and high risk of harm
has gone unregulated
despite apparently fulfilling @US_FDA criteria that mandate it be regulated
3/Nearly all prescribers and national pharmacies now see the Bamboo Health, Inc proprietary “NARXcare” algorithm in a more prominent position *than the prescription history itself” when they view a prescription history.
1/Arguing for methadone deregulation, Dr. Ruth Potee notes that in an auditorium of 400 addiction specialists, almost NONE prescribe methadone (because they can't)
"Methadone is a miracle drug that no one has access to"
There are more people who offer Botox than offer methadone
Patient: “I can still do my activities”.
Doc: "No way, not really. I read the SPACE trial, and there is NO benefit (that would outweigh the opioids’ risk)”
"Shared decision-making" seems *doomed* here