W no evidence to speak of, the @ohiogop accused the judge handling our drop box case (he had granted their motion to intervene) of “collusion.”
It was stunningly inappropriate.
We filed a motion today seeking a show cause order for why they should not be held in contempt.
It was stunningly inappropriate.
We filed a motion today seeking a show cause order for why they should not be held in contempt.
https://twitter.com/pavanforjudge/status/1306394369277202433
The judge has handled the case professionally throughout, and treated all sides fairly.
His decision was well-reasoned and thorough.
He gave LaRose the opportunity to follow his decision without an injunction, which was beyond fair.
Then he issued an injunction today,
His decision was well-reasoned and thorough.
He gave LaRose the opportunity to follow his decision without an injunction, which was beyond fair.
Then he issued an injunction today,
after LaRose refused to follow the decision.
Even then, he granted the stay LaRose requested, assuming he appeals.
The attack on the judge was beyond the pale. And one of the tweets was RT’d by the GOP chair, herself an attorney.
While the statement and tweets have been...
Even then, he granted the stay LaRose requested, assuming he appeals.
The attack on the judge was beyond the pale. And one of the tweets was RT’d by the GOP chair, herself an attorney.
While the statement and tweets have been...
...removed from the Internet, they do not simply go away.
And the anger and unhinged nature of the baseless attack speaks volumes.
And the anger and unhinged nature of the baseless attack speaks volumes.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
