Evan LaPointe Profile picture
Sep 17, 2020 22 tweets 4 min read Read on X
There are three kinds of trust. They are very different from each other. Here's what each is, and what your business gets from each of them...

👇
Level 1 trust is trusting that someone else can do something "well enough."

Think of a potluck dinner in your neighborhood. This is trusting your neighbor to bring something, but asking them to bring chips rather than making something. They won't screw that up...right?
(thanks @usujason for that perfect example).

What you get from this level of trust is the ability to offload tasks that should go well but there's tolerance for mistakes and poor quality. You get to move faster, but you still have to clean up mistakes sometimes.
Trust 2 is trusting that someone can do something just as well as you can. This is delegation.

What you get from this level of trust is true scale. You get more of your time and quality, and the more of these people you can find, the better you can scale.
Trust 3 is trusting that someone can do something you couldn't [maybe ever] do. This is what it feels like to extend your horizons and potential.

When you work with brilliant designers, analysts, sales people, marketers, developers, you feel this.
This is a level of trust that many people struggle with, but this is the level of trust that changes the game.

Some of the reason that people can do things other people can't has to do with knowledge: they have learned something another person hasn't.

But here's the reality...
The much bigger reason these people can do what others can't is because they have psychological and cognitive abilities others can never achieve.

That's a tough pill to swallow, but think about it. We all have limits to our ability to perceive. It's a hard truth.
Creativity is the clearest example. Deeply creative people have access to a world of comprehension and experimentation that the rest of us will never have access to. The right prefrontal cortex in their minds is hyperactive and genius.
We witness this daily in music, art, architecture, storytelling, design, and more.

Hundreds of people graduate from the Berklee school of music every year with similar musical skill, but only a tiny fraction of those people have the creative capacity to make mind blowing music.
And the other artists and students know it. Ask them and they will say, "I have NO idea how they do it."

People at the top of any craft look at the best and literally have no clue how they do it. No ability to deconstruct or understand the inputs. It's just creative magic.
It's like the event horizon of a black hole. Creatively, we all have an event horizon. It can move a bit, but some people's event horizon is not 5% farther, it's billions of miles farther than mine (or yours).

When you learn to accept that, you can start to use trust 3.
That concept applies to cognitive ability, dealing with complexity, and even compassion. A disagreeable person's event horizon for understanding others' reactions is not far from center. Compassionate people understand things that a disagreeable person could never perceive.
The core reason that elite teams thrive and other teams struggle is because of Trust 3, the highest form of trust. They have the emotional and intellectual maturity to trust that others have talents they will never understand.

At this level of trust, you get something magical...
You get the ability to PREDICT things you can't COMPREHEND.

That's a big deal. Most people won't do things they don't understand. But when we trust people who are able to operate beyond our event horizon, we can operate beyond the boundaries of our comprehension.
If you want innovation, you need Trust 3.

If you want engagement, you need Trust 3.

If you want customer success, you need Trust 3.

If you want brilliant code, you need Trust 3.

If you want to avoid mistakes, you need Trust 3.

Don't limit potential to what you understand.
This is why Steve Jobs said A players hire A players, B players hire C players, and so on.

The only A players are people who are enthusiastic about and trusting of other A players. They are the only ones who feel comfortable enough in their own skin to invoke Trust 3.
So here's the question...

Is your culture a Trust 3 culture? Do you wrestle over things you don't understand, or do you operate out of total faith in those who can do what you can't?

Do you debate about the ROI of design? Do you ask what you get out of investing in analytics?
Do you force developers to build things in shorter timelines than they ask for, using fewer resources than they say they need?

These are not Trust 3 cultures.

Those cultures kill you twice.
First, they kill you when projects are under-resourced and falter or fail.

Second, they kill you even worse because you teach people to negotiate internally. You teach them to ask for more than they need because they know going in that you won't give them what they ask for.
You know what another word for internal negotiating is?

Lying.

You are teaching your people to lie about what they need, what projects will do for the business (so you will say yes to their pitch rather than the "no" they expect to get if they say what the project really is).
That second death is the real death of the business. It's the death that transcends your future. While the first death is a missed opportunity, the second is a system that infects every opportunity.

It exposes your business to permanent risk and undermines communication.
So again, do you have a Trust 3 culture?

Get one.

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Evan LaPointe

Evan LaPointe Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @evanlapointe

Feb 14, 2023
I have managed, started and run companies, and helped thousands of people on hundreds of teams. Or at least have tried to.

I now believe people fall into 7 learning styles.

Here's what they are. I think learning this might save you 10 years of pain... Image
Now, right off the bat, I have to say that this is my own theory and experience. Trying to help colleagues, superiors, reports, clients, and friends, I see a very clear pattern.

In hopes this helps you navigate the confusing and often frustrating world of managing, here we go...
The 7 learning styles:
1. Intuitive - these people already get it and do it

2. Brink - these people are right on the cusp of a breakthrough, and want it badly

3. Eager - these people love to learn and grow as individuals and will eagerly approach smart thinking
Read 21 tweets
Feb 14, 2023
Product is the only role that has a "pinned dependency."

Executives depend on sales, marketing, and customer retention for success to be possible.

All of those depend on product for success to be possible.

Product depends on executives for success to be possible.

Great… twitter.com/i/web/status/1…
Just to be totally clear:

Executives need sales, marketing and customer success to meet revenue targets.

Sales, marketing, and customer success need product to be awesome or everything they do is harder or impossible.

Product needs executives to support their efforts to make… twitter.com/i/web/status/1…
This isn't to say that other roles don't have dependencies or feel pinned.

The point here is that this rock and hard place dependency on product literally pins the entire company.
Read 5 tweets
Jan 30, 2023
Many leaders truly do not believe that people are driven by purpose, human connection, and culture. They don't trust that these tools would work.

The question is whether they can learn, how quickly, or whether they will live in darkness their entire careers.
This is the thesis behind the company I wanted to start and what keeps me going all day, every day.

I have learned so far that there are different learning styles. For simplicity, let's make it 3:

1. Eager learners
2. Resistant learners
3. Defensive non-learners
Eager learners already know there is a better way. They are either looking for the key that unlocks performance, or they at least believe it could be out there, somewhere.
Read 10 tweets
Jan 27, 2023
Ideas are just the start. They are never perfect, but they are also almost never fully terrible.

Ideas have 5 parts:
1. The reason they came up
2. A stab at what is being suggested
3. Strong but incomplete thoughts
4. Incorrect assumptions
5. Blind spots

Always understand 1…
1 is almost never fully wrong. Even if 2-5 are all insane, 1 can still be great.

2 should not be shot on site, ever. Stop being a jerk about ideas and killing them before diving in. That makes you look much stupider than you are trying to make the idea (or person) look.
3 is intentional. Why would a person fully flesh out their thinking at the risk of it being a total loss. Stop criticizing ideas with incomplete thinking, instead appreciating that your input is valuable. And being the boss is not the reason your input is valuable…
Read 8 tweets
Dec 11, 2022
I think it’s clear to me now I would absolutely hate to climb the product manager career ladder. Sounds filled with immense bullshit. Being an entrepreneur may have actually been easier.
I can’t imagine having to report to someone who thinks product is some sort of process, who sets insane goals there’s nothing my actions could affect, or who wants me to be a project manager. It’s almost like these people want the products to progress as clumsily as possible.
After we were acquired by a huge tech company I did endure some of this. Most was product people thinking every ounce of product needs to create some sort of plain sight ROI, even things like documentation. It was insanity. No understanding/acceptance of the fundamentals of prod
Read 5 tweets
Aug 8, 2022
Very few teams really know what high-performance is. So I figured I'd do a quick writeup this morning to illustrate exactly what high-performance teams are, how they think, and how it's different than any other team.

Let's get started. Image
Fundamentally, performance is about the ability to achieve. It's hard to call a team high-performance if they can't reach goals.

But let's remember something important here: teams are going to have many at-bats. So winning games isn't about hitting the first ball. That's luck.
Teams (and many humans) have a bias: they think that the outcomes somehow justify the inputs.

If you've ever seen a horrible golfer, you've seen this. Their swing looks like they're being electrocuted. Every now and then they hit a good shot, making them feel their swing works.
Read 22 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us!

:(