Research paper after research paper all seem to be saying that majority of farming households in many parts of Nigeria were food insecure. Didn't make sense. How could you be growing food and still be food insecure?
One morning, I called @NnimmoB and asked him if he could explain this to me. Why are many farmers not even able to feed themselves? I could hear the smile on the phone when he answered: They invest so much time in producing so little that they barely have income for other needs
So they have to sell the best of their crops in order to pay other bills. Also, no storage, so during the lean season, they have to buy food from traders who have storage. This takes up most of the income they already earned in the harvest season.
Also, they didn't have bargaining power - because food is perishable and without storage, what are you going to do with rotten food?
It made sense.
Whenever you don't have bargaining power in the value chain, its because you aren't adding enough value, so buyers can discount u.
Smallholder subsistence farming is a poverty trap. The farmers who are able to escape fare the ones with larger farms (not too many), relatively good education and access to credit. And even then, they do not capture much value from the food value chain. Why?
With the advent of mechanized farming, the production step has been commoditized. The only value you can create is if you do it at scale, efficiently and with very high yields or else, the margins are too slim to live within. A lot of value has shifted to other parts of the chain
Processing, marketing, distribution, retail (and retail value adds) are now huge value centers because, they are addressing the big natural drivers of consumption like taste and access.
If we want to do better for small farmers in Nigeria, these are the parts of the chain we need to commoditize. If we don't commoditize these capacities, those with access to these capacities will retain bargaining power even if we introduce negative market forces through bans
Negative market forces often promise to attract value add players who are driven to create abundance. But more often than not, the kind of players who eventually thrive under these circumstances are those better at continuously exploiting scarcity.
We also have to help smallholder communities scale through aggregation of production assets (including land) - @vonkemedi has been doing quite a lot of this. Aggregated pools of smallholders can even afford mechanisation (rental). Collective bargaining is also now possible. 😁
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
So, I asked ChatGPT to help me illustrate Odumeje's powers. Thread:
We started with my favourite "Ganduka Gandusa", which it interpreted as an ancient ethereal and mystical energy. So the illustration is set against a backdrop that blends elements of the cosmos with an ancient forest.
Then I asked it to illustrate "Abido Shaker". It says, "This time, I'm imagining a scene that focuses on the elemental and primal force of nature, suggesting a power that can shake the very foundation of the earth."
The series of tweets on "Dorm" accounts from this account illustrate how financial ignorance and economic illiteracy can end up doing unintended and irreversible damage to the economy.
Thread:
1. Lets start with the fact that the author of this tweet - who is also a member of Nigeria's parliament - calls it "Dorm" accounts. It suggests ignorance of the name and the policy intention of these kinds of accounts. The correct name is "Dom", short for Domiciliary Accounts.
2. Dom accounts are a key aspect of the policy to incentivize potential forex inflows from autonomous sources into Nigeria by allowing autonomous recipients of these funds to DOMICILE them in Nigerian banks at close to the value at which the transaction was initiated.
The Federal High Court sitting in Abuja has ruled in favour of six women who were harassed and abused during raids by the Abuja Environmental Protection Board (AEPB), police and other law enforcement agents in April 2019.
The six women, through a team of lawyers comprising of Deji Ajare, Mojirayo Ogunlana-Nkanga, Bamidele Jacobs, Jennifer Ogbogu, Miriam Orika, Chigoziem Onugha, Martins Obono Augusta Yaakugh led by Sterling Law Centre, filed public interest suits seeking to enforce their…
When I say that there is an exclusive Nigerian identity fostered by the state, this is what it looks like. The national solidarity is engendered by patronage through oil blocks and monthly transfers. The average Nigerian lives at the margins of the state, participating by proxy.
When a part of Nigeria says they are marginalised, they often mean to say that the representives of their ethnic group through whom they broker their participation have been poorly treated by the patronage network.
In actual fact, all of Nigeria is marginalised, save the few.
The patronage system and all its corollaries including federal character, rotational presidency and fuel subsidy are designed to be exclusive and are built on the fantasy of trickle down economics.
State formation is a process. Every state in the world is somewhere along the continuum working its way forward or backward. This is where I think Nigeria is on the continuum. What do you think?
People take Stage 1 for granted because geographic homogeneity is a common assumption. But drawing boundaries can be a violent process. Who are you including that wants out? How do you deal with pockets of opposition that threaten the contiguousness of the map? Crush or resettle?
Stage 1 is usually driven by people with some sort of power. For instance, ISWAP has penetrated some territories in the Northeast. These territories were not ceded voluntarily by the previous occupiers. This is only the first step of state formation.