Scott Coley Profile picture
Sep 17, 2020 11 tweets 2 min read Read on X
Recent discussion of CRT in conservative evangelical circles is, I think, largely if not entirely a distraction from substantive issues. It’s a transparent attempt to delegitimize the demand for institutional justice without any substantive engagement on real issues.
In point of fact, the concept of systemic racism is used across a number of disciplines to describe a variety of different phenomena. Two general fields of application stand out. One has to do with psychology—racist attitudes and so forth. The other has to do with institutions.
A lot of political and cultural conservatives (some of them evangelicals) identify all claims about systemic racism with CRT, and then define CRT strictly in terms of psychological theorizing about racist attitudes.
They then point out that CRT is vaguely related, in ways that they can’t quite explain, to Marxism. It leaves conservative Christians with the impression that all talk of ‘systemic racism’ originates with Marxists who say mean things about white people and American consumerism.
And they’ve managed to elicit this reaction without saying a single word about institutional injustice—which has nothing to do with CRT, really, except insofar as some critical race theorists happen to comment on the racial inflection of institutional injustice in the U.S.
It’s a remarkable sleight of hand. It allows white evangelicals to dismiss all claims to do with institutional injustice without saying the first thing about, e.g., the federal government’s discriminatory housing policies that remained officially in force until 1968:
policies that produced all sorts of toxic problems—from school segregation to racial disparities in wealth and income, incarceration, etc.—real things that now impact the day-to-day lives of millions of Americans, many of whom happen to be our brothers and sisters in Christ.
A lot of the same white evangelicals who reject the notion of systemic injustice also claim they’re praying for some sort of national revival. I’m not sure whether a modern nation-state is the sort of thing that’s eligible for a spiritual revival. But set that to one side.
The God that I read about in the Bible will have nothing whatsoever to do with a people who store up harvests sown with the seeds of injustice.

In fact, God detests the supplications of such people.
So as long as you persist in denying that systemic racism is a problem, don’t worry about whether the government permits you to go to church, with or without a mask. Don’t worry what kind of music you sing there, or whether you sing at all. Because none of it matters.
As long as you refuse to address systemic injustice, and willingly continue to benefit from it, God doesn’t want to hear from you. Your church is just a building where you meet up with your friends.

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Scott Coley

Scott Coley Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @scott_m_coley

Jun 27
Note that this is all stuff this guy just made up.

The evangelical marketplace of ideas is resplendent with the uncultivated intuitions of theological entrepreneurs…

1/ Image
promoting “biblical” perspectives on geology, political theory, developmental psychology, economics, critical race theory, psychopharmacology, gender and sexuality, media and entertainment, public health, and on and on.

2/
Under the guise of subjecting human reason to biblical scrutiny, American evangelicals have transformed Christian theology into a nomadic culture war
machine:

3/
Read 10 tweets
Mar 28
Within authoritarian ecosystems, men in power often lie about their opponents in a way that desensitizes their audience to some unpalatable truth about themselves. Image
Here Joe implies that David French and Russ Moore hold liberal democratic norms on par with scripture—an obvious falsehood.

True to form, Joe doesn’t state the falsehood explicitly—he merely implies it in a way that any competent language user understands.
(French or Moore might claim that modern liberal democracy is rooted in the Christian intellectual tradition, or that liberal norms can be derived from biblical norms. Not sure exactly what their respective views are here, but:
Read 9 tweets
Feb 4
It’s obvious that “this book isn’t meant to be read” doesn’t imply “I haven’t read this book.”

So obvious that one has to wonder: “How could any literate person draw such an inference?”

I have no idea, so I’ll let you and your friends wrestle with that question.

That said,
The substantive point is not in dispute: you didn’t read the book prior to commenting on it.

Here you speculate about what arguments are likely to be presented in the book (see screenshot—same screenshot from before, with relevant portion circled). Image
So why did I highlight the sentence in which you claim the book isn’t meant to be read?

For the same reason I highlighted the sentence before it (which also doesn’t imply that the author hasn’t read the book): namely, that your unearned confidence is hilarious.
Read 9 tweets
Jan 30
misogyny, white supremacy, and abuse

🧵

Here’s the head of the CBMW promoting an article published in American Reformer. Image
American Reformer is an organization whose leadership has documented financial ties to a notorious white supremacist and pornographer. Image
The article itself asserts that those who advocate against abuse in the church are inappropriately empathic due to the influence of feminism.

(Again, this is the article promoted by the head of the CBMW.) Image
Read 13 tweets
Sep 27, 2023
Hello again, Megan.

I understand they deny that they are white Christian nationalists.

But denying something doesn’t mean it isn’t so.

And then there’s the fact that they go and say stuff like this:
Image
If you say that isn’t white Christian nationalism, the disparity in our understanding of what words mean is most likely such that it’s not worth attempting to converse on this or any subject.
If you concede that it is white Christian nationalism, what am I to believe?

Do I believe Stephen Wolfe when he explicitly, obviously, and undeniably advocates *white* Christian nationalism?

Or do I believe him when he denies that he’s advocating white Christian nationalism?
Read 8 tweets
Sep 26, 2023
What do pro-slavery theologians, creation scientists, and white Christian nationalists have in common?
The hermeneutics of legitimization: an approach to biblical interpretation that consistently produces moral justifications for social practices and institutional arrangements that benefit oneself.
The hermeneutics of legitimization has three defining features:

1. Proof-texting;
2. Motivated literalism;
3. Theological paradigm of authority and submission.
Read 21 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us!

:(