Seems to confirm scale of camps system (1.3 million a year). Journos and scholars got it right. This may also include people put through mandatory "educational transformation" without being confined--the less punitive tier of the huge punitive system. scmp.com/news/china/pol…
Worth noting: PRC only provided free public education (including Chinese language) in Xinjiang countryside since 2014. There might have been a better way to educate than charging subsistence farmers for school for 65 years, then suddenly locking millions in camps. But---
This is not really about education, and never was. It's a form of collective punishment and attempted ethnic assimilation.
Also of interest--this PRC white paper contradicts the faux left, trollish conspiracy folks tweeting that camps don't exist, are all CIA plot. PRC ultimately says they are schools, not punitive internment, but admits their existence and numbers of people involved.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
This news that Uyghur folklorist Rahile Dawut was given a life sentence reders absolutely ridiculous any PRC claim that its oppression in the Uyghur region is about terrorism, job creation or poverty. (a thread) duihua.org/life-sentence-…
@nytimes wrote about her before, so should do a follow-up now. Prof. Dawut had a job teaching and researching. She didn't need vocational training. She studied Uyghur folklore, oral literature, some aspects of religion, and did so for many years at Xinjiang's main university.
Rahile Dawut didn't change. The Chinese Communist Party's policy towards non-Han culture changed, and under Xi Jinping decided that Uyghur (and other) non-Chinese culture cannot be tolerated and must be assimilated.
Some thoughts for how to try to think about and report the story of the 11-24 Urumchi fire and wave of protests across PRC opposing zero-Covid policies (a thread).
1. Obviously try to find out what happened (how many dead? were doors and gates sealed? Could people exit freely as Urumchi officials said? Who were the victims? What ethnicity?
Obviously, this will be hard to confirm definitively, since officials will attempt to enforce their version, and it's hard to report from Xinjiang.
We should see the GOP bandwagoning on the complaint by a former employee of @thechinaproj as part of a broader shift, or lurch, in US politics to a point where even to suggest having anything to do with China ("engagement") or PRC people is now considered suspicious (thread)
We've seen this in FBI ethnicity-profiled investigations of Chinese academics under "China initiative." We've seen this in Trump's nearly cancelling student visas for ALL Chinese students. We see it in the Biden admin continuing $billions of Trump tariffs that add to inflation.
We see this in the fact that Chinese students in STEM fields now have problems getting visas to study in US (though that's US cutting off nose to spite face). We see it in anti-Asian hate crime.
Rubio and GOP Rep Chris Smith have decided to go after The China Project (Sinica, SUP China). They say it’s a foreign agent, like Global Times.
Here’s what Global Times says about Darren Byler, who’s work has done so much to explain and call out the atrocities in the Uyghur Region:
And here’s how Sup China project treats Darren Byler : they print his invaluable series of exposés and deep explainers of oppression of Uyghurs: thechinaproject.com/author/darrenb…
Why do I post that pears labeled “Xinjiang pears” are on US supermarket shelves? I have nothing against XJ’s delicious fruits (thread)
But, first, the 2021 Uyghur Forced Labor Prevention Act makes it a “rebutable presumption” that ANY product mined, produced, or manufactured wholly or in part in Xinjiang, could be made with forced labor. Importers have to make the case that it is not.
But PRC does not allow 3rd party auditing firms to operate in XJ and / or given recent and current conditions in XJ, auditors decide they cannot certify supply chains free of forced labor.
Stories portray defeat of resolution to debate UNHCHR report about crimes against humanity as contest of China vs. the West. This gets it very wrong. (thread) reuters.com/world/china/un…
Sure, democracies (not just US) have been pushing the point that throwing 1-2 million people in concentration camps, separating families, banning language, etc. are crimes against humanity. UN report agrees. But casting this as geopolitical contest severely misses the point.
It is sad that so many post-colonial countries (Pakistan, Indonesia, Bolivia, Cameroon, Cuba, Eritrea, Gabon, Namibia, Nepal, Senegal, Sudan, etc.) voted no or, like India and Mexico, abstained on the resolution to debate what's been happening in Xinjiang.