Joseph M. Pierce Profile picture
Sep 17, 2020 10 tweets 2 min read Read on X
For those wondering why Trump recently linked a critique of the nuclear family to a critique of whiteness, a thread: The family is the main place where gender, race, and sexuality are constructed in contemporary societies.
Marx and Engels described the family as the place where the division of labor first occurs, and thus, where women are first subjected to discrimination on the basis of gender.
Foucault called the family the interchange of the regime of sexuality and regime of alliance. He meant that the family unit stabilizes power differentials by creating "sexuality" and by turning marriage into a "contract".
...a contract "between men" over the body of a woman, as Gayle Rubin would famously argued.
Rubin called the family the site where the sex/gender system is enacted, the place where gender is established, imprinted onto the body, by culture (not biology).
The family is thus the axis of power transmission in Western cultures. Property is inherited through the family. Women are traded as "property" through marriage (do you take this woman to be your wife? is an exchange of women, as Rubin says), and thus the family.
But this ideal of family is also highly racialized. Native Americans, Black people, and other POC have always been judged against the presumed "norm" of the white nuclear family. Indigenous people were deemed savage precisely because they did not grant property through men.
The ideal of the nuclear family is the product of Christian (in particular Protestant) norm creations and legal structures that policed "deviance" from this norm that was in fact produced by racial violence.
The ruptures of the slave trade; genocide of Native American communities; indentured servitude of Asian immigrants; ICE detention targeting of Latinx migrants and children, are all manifestations of this power dynamic.
The family has to be protected by white people in order to maintain property. All other forms of kinship have to be eradicated in order for that norm to exist unchallenged. Black and Brown people with our breath, with our bodies, challenge this norm. That is what Trump means.

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Joseph M. Pierce

Joseph M. Pierce Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @PepePierce

Dec 21, 2022
So you want to decolonize your syllabus, a thread:
1. Start by understanding what decolonization means, and that it is not a metaphor (Tuck and Yang), but a material, tangible, physical process.
2. But what does that mean for my syllabus? It means not simply adding one or two Indigenous texts, but asking how the fundamental premise of the course is predicated on settler colonialism, theft of land, culture, and life, and then, and only then...
2 (ctd). asking what changes to the structure of the course, the questions you are asking, and the method or approach to those questions can be not just inclusive of, but centered on, and in good relations with, Indigenous decolonial praxis.
Read 11 tweets
Dec 20, 2022
If race is not a precondition for humanness, but rather an effect of structural inequalities, namely the structuring of the world according to western imperial logics, then race is not simply a fiction but an imperial tool.
If race is an imperial tool, which is to say, a figuring of humanity as developmental, incremental, and thus, temporally determined, then whiteness is always figured as of the present, while people "of color" are figured as of the past.
If people of color are always figured as of the past, as backward, behind, undeveloped, then it is not because of any intrinsic quality of race, but the narrative quality of time in the hands of western imperialism.
Read 6 tweets
Nov 8, 2022
The Supreme Court will be hearing arguments about #ICWA tomorrow. This is a thread about trans-racial adoption, Indigenous futures, and the intergenerational effects of US assimilation policies. 1/
My father was adopted by a white family as a newborn in 1952. We knew nothing about his biological kin. He never wanted to know about them. He never asked. He never wanted to open that wound. 2/
I am the biological son of my father. And even though I was not the one adopted out, every time someone asked me, where are you from? What is your ethnicity? What are you? I had no answers. I had no way of knowing how to approach those questions. 3/
Read 16 tweets
Sep 24, 2022
It’s the year 2078. I am a spirit ancestor. The sidewalks crack with wild tobacco and the wind rushes prayers to silent stars. Colonialism is over. The dark earth sighs with relief. And beauty is no longer a dream.
But the dreaming has only begun. Dreams sprout, hyacinths emerging, casting their purple light. Dreams that had only been dreamt in secret begin to take shape, amass. These silent dreams deferred, these wonderings, it-can't-possiblies, these futures, shudder and stretch to life.
The dreams join in council. There is much to discuss now that the world is healing. They look at each other, the past-dreams, the future-dreams, and they decide on a representative to take their suggestions to the People: Memory. Memory stands, nods in gratitude, ready, fierce.
Read 14 tweets
Aug 24, 2022
With ICWA being debated in SCOTUS this November, I think it is important to understand three things about Indigenous people and adoption.
1. The United States has systematically and insistently sought to dismantle Indigenous kinship networks since the very beginning. Indigenous children represent Indigenous futures, and thus have been the prime targets for both assimilation in boarding schools, and adoption.
2. Adoption is often framed as "benefitting" Indigenous children, but that framing depends on a settler understanding of kinship and well-being, which often sees Indigenous women, specifically, as always already unfit mothers.
Read 11 tweets
Oct 7, 2021
I've posted a couple thoughts on land acknowledgments recently, but the point is this: an acknowledgment is not the same as a relationship. Land does not require that you confirm it exists or that it has been stolen, rather that you reciprocate the care that it has given you.
Elaboration: The land and water and air, the territory, exists regardless of the acknowledgment, which is only ever a first step. Next steps involve treating territory as kin, building relationships with that land itself, as if it were your kin. Because it is.
Elaboration 2: to acknowledge the land on the terms laid out by liberal or multicultural inclusion is only to repeat the hubris of anthropocentrism. To acknowledge the land on the land’s terms is to act in reciprocity.
Read 4 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us!

:(