1. Dispensing with the most important thing first:
-Voting by mail is safe and secure.
-Several states, including Republican-led Colorado, voted by mail pre-pandemic. It does not lead to fraud.
-States have ballot-tracking measures in place; counterfeiting a ballot is hard.
2. China, Russia, and Iran are all attempting to influence our political discourse right now.
So are domestic disinformers (including by paying troll farms staffed with minors).
Disinformation is a detriment to democracy no matter where it's coming from.
3. Recognizing that's not what the President wants to hear, let's take a look at what we know about Chinese and Russian influence operations...
Both China and Russia use all levers -- government, non-government, criminal, state-run media -- to exercise influence.
(You can read a brief history of Chinese and Russian influence operations in this paper I co-authored for the US Army War College Quarterly, Parameters: press.armywarcollege.edu/parameters/vol…)
4. Where Russia and China differ is their strategies' ultimate goals:
China is interested in promoting a positive image of China and undermining those countries that endanger that image.
Russia is not politically scrupulous. It is happy to support ideologies that are polar opposites (see, for instance, agitation on behalf of both BLM and gun rights activists in 2016) toward the goal of furthering discord and undermining the democratic system.
Here's a little excerpt from my book where I describe the difference between Soviet propaganda and today's Russian influence efforts. You could make a similar comparison between Chinese and Russian goals.
5. In terms of tactics, Russia is much more advanced. When China has tried to mount large, inauthentic campaigns (including around the Hong Kong protests), they've been pretty sloppy and easy to spot. Over the past few months, China has relied on overt accounts...
...including government officials and state-run media to get its messages out.
It works, to a certain extent, but it is clunkier than what Russia does, and how Russia has adapted since 2016. Gone are the days of bots and trolls. Welcome to the age of information laundering.
6. We cannot hope to win the fight against disinformation when our own elected officials are:
-undermining the threat
-spreading it themselves, leaving us more vulnerable to whatever foreign adversary wants to manipulate our polarization to their own benefit
7. And just in case you didn't get it the first time:
There is no basis whatsoever to the conspiracy theory that Russia or China could mass-forge mail in ballots to manipulate the results of our election.
I've observed elections in Russia, Ukraine, and Georgia. Ballot forgeries don't even happen there. Do you know why? Because that would be very dumb and incredibly easy to spot.
The more insidious and more common manpulations? Abuse of administrative resources (things like, I don't know, using government property for campaign events...just spitballing!!!) and manipulation of media access to sway the discourse and ultimately the results.
PHEW. That's all. Whole lotta nonsense in that one tweet.
I hate going to bed mad, so here, do something positive and check your voter information/register, and make a plan to vote!
@AmericanSunProj has identified a network of over 1000 likely automated, pro-Russian X accounts that we're calling "Sleeper Agents," as some have been active for over a DECADE.
@AmericanSunProj This network, which has generated over 100M posts, amplifies Kremlin propaganda within seconds of it being posted. It uses AI-generated or stolen profile pictures to give the guise of grassroots, authentic support. And it engages across divisive issues in the US and beyond. 2/
@AmericanSunProj We weren’t surprised to find a Russian bot network; we were surprised how *old* this network is. Isn’t Elon Musk supposed to be doing something about spam and inauthentic behavior on this platform? 🙃 3/
If you’re wondering why, when JD Vance was asked if he’d certify the 2024 election, he (weirdly) pivoted to allege “Kamala Harris is engaged in censorship at an industrial scale,” I gotchu. 1/
Over the past 2.5 years, the Republican party (and some on the far left) have manufactured a crisis that claims Americans’ right to free speech is under attack. 2/
They have ripped quotes from their context to sound scary; tonight Vance invoked Walz once saying “there’s no guarantee to free speech on misinformation”. Except that Walz was speaking *explicitly* about voter intimidation, which is not protected speech! 3/mediaite.com/news/viral-vid…
Waking up to this news in Australia, which hits upon a theme I've been repeating throughout my presentations here:
Information laundering is alive and well, and one of the most powerful tools disinformation actors have in their arsenals as we careen toward November. 1/
What is information laundering? It's when bad actors obscure the initial source of information through another individual or organization to make it seem more trustworthy or get around restrictions (like, for instance, FARA, or political ad disclosures on social media). 2/
(I wrote a little tongue in cheek parody about it in 2021 that the right wing endlessly ridiculed, but I stand by every word: It's how you hide a little lie. 3/)
Let’s talk about Mark Zuckerberg’s letter to the House Judiciary Committee, in which he alleges that he felt that the White House “repeatedly pressured his teams to censor” content.
This is nothing more than a cynical political ploy at self preservation. 1/
Jim Jordan and the right have been alleging censorship for years. Why does Zuckerberg release this letter now, three months before the election? To signal to Congressional republicans that he’s not against them. It worked for Musk- why shouldn’t Zuckerberg try it out now too? 2/
Interestingly, if these allegations were real, Jordan could have made them himself. He has in his possession dozens of interviews and depositions with tech workers, including Facebook employees, who say they did not feel coerced by the White House. 3/
Spoke with @Channel4News about the changes on this platform since it got a new owner.
Lots of the replies challenging the quote here asking me to name a single example of offline violence after Musk amplified disinfo. Challenge accepted. Here's just a few: 1/
Former Twitter executive Yoel Roth was forced to leave his home after credible threats of violence when Musk enabled the Twitter filed and falsely alleged Roth was sympathetic to pedophilia 2/
Australian eSafety Regulator Julie Inman Grant's children were doxxed after Musk tweeted about her for *doing her job* and requesting that Twitter remove a video of a stabbing that had the potential to generate follow-on attacks 3/
In 2020 I led a study on gendered abuse and disinfo against women political candidates. We found 336k pieces of abuse & disinfo targeting 13 candidates; 78% of that targeted Kamala Harris. After Biden’s endorsement, here are some narratives and tropes we should look out for: (1/)
1. Sexualized narratives, claiming Harris “slept her way to the top,” or that she is sexually promiscuous. In 2020 we found that users engaging with this narrative were more likely to engage with other abuse and disinfo. They attempted to undermine her fitness for office (2/)
2. Transphobic narratives are also often employed against women in public life; in 2020, users claimed Harris couldn’t have risen to a position of power without having secretly been a man. They falsely alleged she had been a man named “Kamal Aroush” before transitioning. (3/)