Today’s PA Supreme Court rulings on postmark deadline, Green Party & drop boxes have been hailed as big victories for Biden. But overall, I’m not so sure Biden got the better end of these rulings. 1/ cnbc.com/2020/09/17/202…
The court sided w/ Trump to reject so-called “naked ballots” - mail ballots that voters forgot to enclose in secrecy envelopes. In the June primary, in at least one county over 5% (!) of mail voters failed to enclose their votes in the inner envelope. sharonherald.com/news/lawrence-…
The reason? Most PA voters have little experience voting by mail.
If 50% of Dems were to vote by mail and only 10% of Reps did, and 5% of ballots were rejected, Biden could be docked 2.5% of his votes and Trump docked only 0.5%.
In PA, that could potentially be enormous.
Moreover, the court declined to mandate a “cure” regime for election boards to notify voters of ballot defects and to ensure voters have the opportunity to fix their rejected ballots. That’s quite different from many other states and could prove meaningful in a close race.
Put another way: let’s say there are 3 million Biden voters in PA. 50% of them prefer to vote by mail, but 4% of them send their ballots back “naked,” forget to sign in the right place, etc.
That would be 60k votes out the window. Trump’s PA margin in 2016 was 44k.
/end
P.s. I didn’t totally pull these numbers out of thin air. The most recent @QuinnipiacPoll of PA a few weeks back showed 47% of Ds planning to vote by mail vs. 13% of Rs.
It would, however, be great to have more robust county-level data on “naked ballots” from the June primary.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
How is it Dems are cleaning up in special elections/referendums if their national poll numbers are so bad? Because in the Trump era, Dems are excelling w/ the most civic-minded, highly-engaged voters.
Their biggest weakness? Peripheral voters who only show up in presidentials.
A big reason Dems beat pundit/historical expectations in the midterms? Only 112M people voted, including a disproportionate turnout among voters angry at Dobbs/abortion bans (many of them young/female).
But there will be ~160M voters in 2024. So who are those extra 48M voters?
They skew young, unaffiliated, nonwhite and non-college. They’re also more likely to base their choice on a simplistic evaluation of whether the economy was better under Trump or Biden.
On this question - and on immigration/age concerns - Biden is routinely getting clobbered.
Fact: of the 301 new House districts that have now been adopted, just 17 (5.6%) went for Biden or Trump by five points or less, down from 39 of 301 (13.0%) districts in the same states currently.
Back in 2012, after the last redistricting round, 66/435 districts went for Obama or McCain by five points or less. By 2020, only 51/435 districts went for Biden or Trump by five points or less - in other words, voter self-sorting explains a lot of the competitive decline.
But the 2022 redistricting cycle is rapidly compounding the decline. There may only be 30-35 seats in that range by the time all is said and done.
So the House's pro-GOP bias may be reduced or eliminated, but the House is also on pace to be more anti-competitive than ever.
NEW: for the first time, Dems have taken the lead on @CookPolitical's 2022 redistricting scorecard. After favorable developments in NY, AL, PA et. al., they're on track to net 2-3 seats from new maps vs. old ones.*
*There's still quite a bit of uncertainty in:
- FL, where Rs are debating how aggressive to be
- NC/OH, where courts may order big changes to GOP maps
- PA, where the state Sup Ct will select a map
- AL/LA/SC, where SCOTUS could decide on additional Black opportunity seats
*Evergreen disclaimer: this doesn't mean Dems are on track to gain House seats *overall* in 2022. A 2-3 seat redistricting gain is significant, but a 42% Biden approval rating could be worth several dozen seats to the GOP in November.
NEW: Dem leaders in Albany are set to release maps in the next 72 hours, but there's still tension between Marc Elias/Sean Patrick Maloney - who are pushing for a hyper-aggressive 23D-3R gerrymander - and Upstate Dem incumbents who'd like more minor changes to their districts.
At issue: it's theoretically possible to draw a 23D-3R gerrymander w/ 23 double-digit Biden seats (example, left). But it would require Dem Reps. Paul Tonko #NY20, Joe Morelle #NY25 and Brian Higgins #NY26 to give up some existing blue turf (current map, right).
There's talk NY Dems might instead propose a milder 22D-4R gerrymander that leaves Tonko, Morelle and Higgins districts intact but still shores up #NY18 Maloney & #NY19 Delgado (rough sketch below).
In this scenario, #NY22 Rep. Claudia Tenney (R) could be spared.
BREAKING: national Dems are using a "communities of interest" argument to urge their Albany counterparts to adopt an aggressive 23D-3R gerrymander that could wipe out five of NY's eight GOP seats. nyirc.gov/storage/commen…
Highlights of the 23D-3R plan recommended by commenter "Sean Patrick:"
- Staten Island #NY11 drawn in w/ Lower Manhattan
- New maj-min #NY02 on Long Island
- #NY27 Jacobs (R) merged w/ #NY23 Reed (R)
- #NY22 Tenney (R) put in a D-leaning seat
- #NY03 crosses Long Island Sound
More highlights of the Maloney plan submitted via public comment to NY's redistricting site:
- #NY16 Bowman (D) goes from Bronx to rural Dutchess
- #NY17 Jones (D) goes to the Catskills
- #NY19 Delgado (D) goes to Ithaca/Binghamton
- #NY25 Morelle (D) picks up Buffalo suburbs