It took me much longer to make SL. Not because I wasn't smart, or hardworking. I was very sick. I miscarried three times. I had difficult pregnancies and births. I lost my home, pets and relationships. My department imploded (nothing to do with me). Luck, or lack of it, matters.
I've had more setbacks than most but I still have many privileges. I've faced discrimination and problems, and been very fortunate. If I can't differentiate between all these I'm a poor advisor to others seeking academic careers
You should know my #ResearchCompanion message by now but if you don't it's 'who am I bringing in? who am I leaving out?'
The 'I did this so you can too!' or 'I did this all by myself, no luck, no privilege' does everyone a disservice.
Academic achievements at a young age can be impressive but they may obscure barriers faced by marginalised scholars; the existence of mature scholars; and that different universities have different criteria/standards for promotion (e.g. a SL at one uni wouldn't be at another)
All of which is unhelpful because it makes everything into a competition. It's not enough to publish,you have to publish loads in top journals; grants aren't enough unless they're millions;lectureships only count at certain unis;lecturers are 'better' than other academic staff 😢
We should be proud of our achievements and celebrate them, but not at the expense of others or without acknowledging the things that benefitted us along the way. It's possible to share these along with our struggles. Makes for a more inspiring and relatable story.
At 26 I was self funding my PhD having asked for yet another extension because of chronic illness and several surgeries plus a miscarriage that coincided with my long term relationship ending and losing the home I’d bought and my pets while falling deeper into debt and depression
Even within all that and the barriers and bad luck that had preceded my PhD (parents divorcing, poverty, undiagnosed learning disability, crappy school experience and the kind of boyfriend you use university as an escape route from) I *still* had some lucky breaks and privileges
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Today's #ResearchTip is imposter syndrome is more than feeling you don't belong. It can be a belief you don't deserve what you've achieved. That good things aren't really yours, they cannot last, or shouldn't be enjoyed. A quick 🧵on how to cope. #AcademicChatter #AcademicTwitter
Reflecting on our journey into academia can be positive. We may find ourselves amazed or happy when we consider just how far we've come, especially if we break down and note our achievements along the way. But some - or a lot of the time - this may be challenging. Why?
It may be due to our past. If we've lived with or through exclusion, prejudice, poverty, insecurity, violence, or other negative experiences then believing in ourselves, having confidence, or a sense of pride or self-worth can be difficult or impossible.
Today's #ResearchTip is a 🧵all about why teaching methods comparatively (qual vs. quant) is a red flag - and why you've probably been taught really badly without even knowing it. (This tip's not a judgement on the QT below btw). #AcademicChatter #AcademicTwitter #HigherEd #MedEd
The quoted tweet shows two images from forthcoming movies. Qual is represented by actor Margot Robbie as Barbie (in vibrant pinks and blue accent colours) and Quant as Cillian Murphy as Oppenheimer (severe, black and white). Barbie is qual, Oppenheimer is quant. #HigherEd #MedEd
The quote tweet has been reacted to enthusiastically, helpfully illustrating how the qual/quant discourse goes
- qual is fluffy and nonsense, quant is precise and clear
- everyday sexism about qual
- quant's better than qual (or vice versa)
- lack of wider contextual awareness
Improving numeracy "to find the best mortgage deal" - mate, most young people are paid so poorly they can't afford to move out of their home. And their families are struggling financially as a consequence. Can your numeracy teaching fix that?
Not a single mention of not enough maths teachers, teachers under huge pressure and stress, rising behaviour problems in schools, lack of SEND provision, nothing about early years. What a joke this lot are. They don't care about education or young people at all.
It's worth noting that Year 11s are currently in the process of applying to college and I bet loads of them will hear this news, panic, assume it's already happening, and now change courses or want to avoid continuing in education. More pressure for schools to deal with.
Make time to read this today. My take is if we taught research methods appropriately we might not need methodological review boards. But given how bad much research is (ESPECIALLY surveys) this is definitely worth considering. If not a formal board, then a feedback review system
We separate methods from ethics and focus on maximising funding and response rates and getting published. All else in between - including what method you picked and whether it's suited to your participants and research question - are secondary 😠
I'm seeing an increasing number of suggestions that we need regulatory bodies to assess research methods, research integrity and more. Which I fear will not improve how we teach and do research (what we need) but will just be perceived as a hoop to jump through.
My maths teacher told me I was thick and, in Year 11, had me sit at the front of the class by her desk as punishment for not trying hard enough. I did badly at school so did have to continue with maths until I was 18. Failed two years worth of resits as well. Hated it.
Inevitably, whenever I post about my struggles with maths people say 'it'll be different now'. But it won't be because I had an undiagnosed learning difficulty at school that hasn't magically cured itself. I can't do it. Excelling in other areas doesn't mean I'm lazy in maths.
Having support to use numbers and organisation in everyday life would be very helpful. Endless, repetitive maths teaching in the hope I'd eventually get something I'll never understand was not. How do I manage doing research? If it's quantitative I work with statisticians 😄
A quick heads-up that 'Blue Monday' will be upon us soon and already I see coaches, therapists and influencers using it to promote themselves/their services and journalists preparing pieces on it. It's a bunch of nonsense with a horrible backstory. Be wary of anyone sharing it.
People either don't know the history of this day, meaning they're happily promoting their services based on something they failed to do due diligence on. Or they know but don't care because they want to capitalise on the day. Either is unfortunate.
The tricky part of crappy 'Blue Monday' is it has taken on its own momentum so any kind of challenge to it gives it more oxygen. And most people see it as just a bit of fun so won't stop using it. Worryingly a lot of those folk are mental/health charities who should know better.