i made a funny blooper tweet last night, thankfully have friends like @IDoTheThinking & @daguilarcanabal to make fun of me when that happens but to reiterate:

No candidate for local office runs on NIMBYism, especially if they're a NIMBY. They run like YIMBYs.

There's a reason.
Poll after poll shows a supermajority of Californians are either natural YIMBYs, or YIMBY-adjacent. Californians of all backgrounds/income levels want more housing that lets them drive less.

The sad part: Like most Americans, most Californians are checked out of local politics.
So, every four years we go through this stupid exercise where SuperNIMBY city councilors like @SophieHahnBerk make these outrageously false claims about how much housing they supported, when anyone who's ever attended a city council meeting knows she's exactly the opposite.
We're getting closer to being able to just chuck them out of office, but these things take time. If there's one thing I dream of this year, it's that we focus on helping our friends and neighbors understand this dynamic.

They'll believe you.
If everyone gets 5 of their friends/neighbors to understand how their city leader who claims to be pro-housing is actually a died-in-the-wool NIMBY, we can start taking seats.

It's work. But there are rewards.
And to fix the blooper: Sophie's opponent is Todd Andrew and he's so grassroots he doesn't have a website, but he's a renter, is very pro-housing, and would transform housing and transit politics on the council.

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with (((Matthew Lewis))) cults & consequences

(((Matthew Lewis))) cults & consequences Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @mateosfo

May 13
Something that's struck me as strange about the discourse about "the groups" and "billionaire oligarchs" is that basically every leftist non-profit and socialist-coded organization is funded at some level by capitalist billionaire tech oligarchs.

Why don't we talk about that? 🧵
In my personal case, as someone who worked in philanthropy for many years, we didn't used to have an unhinged leftist movement spreading lies and focusing on defeating Democrats. Even the most far-left groups, like Greenpeace or ACLU, pretty much stuck to empiricism.
But something changed around ~ 2012-2014 when a new cohort of activists started rising through the ranks.

I specifically recall a trip to New York when I was starting a climate science organization. We met with a bunch of younger activists ...
Read 15 tweets
Mar 28
Trump's call for price controls on cars -- which came right after he effectively put the US Government in charge of car production quotas -- is interesting if you unpack the politics of it.

Yes, it is a transparently communist policy. But so is everything about cars in the US.
American drivers now have multiple generations of acculturation to price controls, quotas, and mandates when it comes to cars; they are fully adapted to communism, even though they still laugh when you point it out.

And this is not a Republican thing. It's bipartisan.
Multiple US Presidents have made taxpayers bail out domestic carmakers after poor management drove them to bankruptcy. That's not something capitalists do -- if you run an unprofitable enterprise that fails, you close.

We've never let capitalism anywhere near the car industry.
Read 9 tweets
Mar 23
For folks new to Abundance discourse you may notice that its critics are, almost to a person, the same people who, about 10 years ago, started opposing YIMBYism because YIMBYs want more homes.

A thread about what's happening 🧵
For the last ~ 40 years, housing policy in US cities has been largely determined by a coalition of NIMBY homeowners and left-leaning non-profits that lean pretty socialist. NIMBYs got what they wanted -- little to no housing -- and leftie non-profits got what they wanted: grift.
So when YIMBYs showed up it was natural for that coalition to not just hang together, but go to war:

YIMBYs are a threat to their ideology. YIMBYs properly diagnosed the problem -- a housing shortage -- that they mutually caused, and maintain for their profit and enjoyment.
Read 13 tweets
Jan 14
The current meltdown in California insurance market — which is one of the major factors behind the number of homes built in extreme high fire hazard zones — dates to 1988.

That’s the year California voters passed Prop 103.

A political 🧵
Initially proposed by California drivers angry over having to pay cost of crashing their cars, Prop 103 was written broadly enough to cover all insurance:

It made it illegal for insurance premiums to adjust based on risk, banned the use of forecast models…
… and instituted price controls on premiums, requiring insurers to petition state every time they wanted to raise rates.

It essentially killed the primary purpose of insurance, which is to signal to market the degree of financial risk someone was taking with a house or car.
Read 12 tweets
Dec 4, 2024
A short personal anecdote: In 1996, I was working in public radio, and attended a public radio conference with a bunch of other radio nerds.

Everyone was freaking out about the telecommunications act. I didn’t understand it at first, but over lunch with a couple engineers …
… they explained that most of the local bandwidth that provided communities with local news and programming was about to be auctioned off to the highest bidder.

It wiped local radio off the map.

In those days, same as today, the highest bidders were right-wing nut jobs.
For reasons I still do not understand, the major progressive/left/Democratic donor class simply do not care about owned media.

And so, rather than robust ecosystem of media supporting a broad, progressive, Democratic agenda, we have small outposts of lefty shitposters, whose …
Read 4 tweets
Nov 23, 2024
The thing that most autonomous vehicle advocates get simply wrong, and seem to have created an ideological barrier against understanding, is the intractable relationship between mobility mode (car, bus, walk, bicycle) and land use (where homes are located, at what density).
Autonomous vehicles, at root, are still just cars. There is talk about expanding to vans/jitneys — and this is, from a mobility perspective, by far the most interesting possible application.

But they still only work in cities.

US land use is designed to maximize sales of cars.
IOW, the *current* spatial pattern of suburbs is such that you can’t live in most of them unless every adult in that home has their own car. Otherwise it’s just about physically impossible for them to go anywhere.

There are huge exceptions: “Inner ring” suburbs built …
Read 15 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us!

:(