Elizabeth Yin πŸ’› Profile picture
Sep 18, 2020 β€’ 16 tweets β€’ 4 min read β€’ Read on X
1) I want to talk about investor kindness in the startup ecosystem.

Personal story - I pitched an investor for my co yrs ago:

Me: "So what do you think?"

Him: "I don't want to say the wrong thing & call you a meek Asian woman, but I question how you'll lead a team of 100 ppl"
2) Needless to say, I was completely shocked that someone in this day and age would say something like that. Outloud. In Silicon Valley.

I was so stunned that I was wondering whether I had actually heard that correctly and if I was actually in a bad dream?
3) But it was in fact reality.

My next thought was that I needed to come up with a response really good and really quickly to respond with otherwise I would be a "meek Asian woman"!
4) I've often reflected back on that moment. The first couple years after this incident, I tried to shove this out of my head.

I only told other founders about it. I was completely embarrassed. Even though I knew that it was he who was in the wrong, I felt like I was inferior.
5) I went through cycles of thought where I've felt angry, embarrassed, and also gratitude. Yes gratitude.

Now that we are many yrs past this, in retrospect, this investor gave me a gift in a weird way.
6) He gave me a glimpse into what either other ppl were thinking consciously or unconsciously.

And that was great feedback. In subsequent mtgs I thought I need to do everything I can to combat the notion that I'm meek.
7) So I sat up in my chair more. Made better eye contact. Brought more energy to the table. Was more dynamic. Was louder.

I consciously did all of those things better. And guess what? I started closing money.
8) The reality is we do not live in a meritocracy. Some ppl are naturally more charismatic or have traits that society favors - rightly or wrongly.

We do what we can as founders to give ourselves the best shot. The first step is in getting feedback to optimize our chances.
9) For this reason, this is why @HustleFundVC we *always* give direct and transparent feedback to prospective founders and portfolio founders.

But there are right and wrong ways to give feedback.
10) A wrong way to give feedback is like what I just described happened to me. Eventually I read between the lines around what I needed to do to optimize my fundraise, but the delivery of that feedback was not great.

Constructive feedback is what we strive for @HustleFundVC .
11) If I were to rewind and sit in that investor's shoes, I would have said, "I'm still deciding whether or not to invest. I just want to give you some quick feedback on your pitch -- I think you should make eye contact and bring more energy to the table. But that's just my $0.02
12) Constructive feedback is tactical - something ppl can mull on and iterate on. Startups are all about iteration -- iteration of people and ideas.

I believe no one is fixed in their skills or growth. No idea is fixed in its model.
13) And that is what I believe investor kindness is. It's not writing a check in everyone - the reality is that's not possible.

But investors can give constructive feedback to try to make ppl & cos better. Investors may be wrong, but constructive feedback comes from a good place
14) But all too often, from my own experience in pitching, feedback isn't constructive.

Moreover, it's not helpful when ppl are only 1/2 paying attention while reading their phone during mtgs. Or checking their SNOW price.

Kindness is also respect.
15) Many ppl ask me why I wanted to become a VC. I didn't & still don't see myself as such.

@HustleFundVC is a co. We want to empower entrepreneurs who hustle (as defined by executing w/ speed) with resources & knowledge.
16) We cannot fund all. But we can be respectful & can provide knowledge & some direct feedback. That is what I think is investor-kindness.

No founder should have to exp what I faced. What I love about new investors entering the ecosystem is the kindness bar increases.

β€’ β€’ β€’

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
γ€€

Keep Current with Elizabeth Yin πŸ’›

Elizabeth Yin πŸ’› Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @dunkhippo33

Apr 2
I tried Paperclip - an open source project that lets you set up an "autonomous company" with multiple AI agents. The concept is wild: you act as a board member setting vision while agents coordinate to build and run the company. More >>
1) What works: The agent orchestration is surprisingly smooth out of the box and was easy to get going. AI content writers, SEO agents, and engineers all coordinate without much manual intervention. It's the closest I've seen to truly autonomous business operations.
2) However, I found that even "autonomous" companies need nudges. My workers would get stuck, or the SEO specialist needed better direction, and coordination would break down more than expected. Still way less work than building a company manually, but not hands-off.
Read 7 tweets
Mar 27
I'm seeing a lot of founders, incl myself, build AI apps with tons of integrations.

It's tempting to integrate to everything - Gmail, Notion, Slack, Telegram, SendGrid... but there's a cliff your app will fall off of if users connect with all these integrations. More >>
1) Latency stacks fast: Every integration adds round trips. What starts as snappy responses becomes sluggish as integrations compound.
2) Context window bloat: More tools = more tokens loaded per request, even for unused integrations. Your token budget gets eaten up before you even start.
Read 7 tweets
Mar 24
The startup landscape has changed dramatically in the last 2 years with AI's rise. But there are 5 specific changes that have been absolute head fakes for many people. Here's what I'm seeing: 🧡
1) Product-market fit is really easy to lose now. I used to believe that if you got past $10M ARR, you were pretty set. These days, that's not true. I've seen companies reach high levels then go to zero because of fast followers and AI-powered competition.
2) Software moats are much harder to come by because anyone can vibe code something in a day. This has made older, less tech-savvy industries MORE attractive because once you get in with your workflow, they're less likely to rip you out for new software.
Read 7 tweets
Nov 22, 2025
Most AI startups will go bankrupt within 18-24 months.

After reviewing hundreds of AI startups' financials at Hustle Fund, I'm seeing a sustainability crisis that nobody's talking about.

The numbers are brutal. 🧡 Image
1- The typical pre-A or series A AI startup is burning $500K/month. A lot of this is on GPUs.

At that pace, a $10M funding round only buys you 20 months of runway and no margin on the revenue.
2- The problem is that companies are growing users.

But expensive GPUs eat into any and all revenue that a company may be making.

There’s just no margin.
Read 10 tweets
Apr 30, 2025
Yesterday, I spoke with some students at UCLA about entrepreneurship, and people asked me what makes for a good startup idea.

Here are some "layered" thoughts...

More >>
1) The first layer you have to cross with a good startup idea is that you need to at scale be bringing in more money than is going out the door.

This is obvious.
2) But, many entrepreneurs don't understand how this breaks down. Your COGs + marketing spend must be less than the lifetime value.
Read 13 tweets
Nov 5, 2024
Something is happening in pre-seed / seed that I think needs to be amplified more.

The gap between pre-seed and seed is getting large.

More >>
1) First, big props to @michaelwma for illuminating this that I had noticed in my own portfolio but had not quite articulated yet.

2) In essence, what I'm seeing is this:

-Pre-seed rounds are getting done at low valuations.
-Hot pre-seed rounds are getting done all over the map
-Seed rounds are getting done at say $8m+ post with companies that have lots of traction -- sometimes $1m+ rev runrate

But...
Read 15 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us!

:(