News of Trump aid to #PuertoRico will do one thing for him that few are talking about: solidify a bit more the 30%-40% of Puerto Rican voters in FL and PA who are more ideologically aligned to GOP and Independents than to Dems. A lot of PR's current leaders are Trump supporters.
It would be foolish of people who THINK they know about Puerto Rico to just easily conclude that this will piss off ALL Puerto Rican voters off is places like FL and PA. Quite the contrary.
So, once again, Trump and as a result his campaign are doing what they have been doing for a while now: get the Latino voters who are voting for him to get excited about that, which is why Biden PR plan was not bold enough.
I stand by these tweets and would welcome all you new Puerto Rico "experts" to learn a bit about this. You would be surprised by how many Puerto Ricans in FL and PA are Trump supporters. Imagine if Dems did real outreach and connection.
You think I am wrong? Two clear examples: Rick Scott and Ron DeSantis. Both did well with Puerto Rican voters in FL, while Bill Nelson and Andrew Gillum were a bit late to the game.
So maybe, just maybe, all you non-Puerto Rican political journalists should take a pause and listen to actual Puerto Ricans on this one?
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Thinking a bit more about how @pnp_pr Democrats missed an opportunity last night during #dncrollcall: Why not say "colony" or "colonialism?"
Because PR Dems also have status quo supporters in the delegation?
Also, another point in next tweet.
Essentially, @pnp_pr Democratic statehood supporters will support Harris (but they can't vote in Nov) but will support Republican statehood supporter @JGO_2024 for governor? González endorsed Trump in 2020 and showed support for him at RNC in 2024.
This example just shows how topsy-turvy Puerto Rico colonial politics really are. Name any other Democrat delegate who would support a Republican candidate for governor, Senate or House in 2024.
Remember that take from 2014 by @nytimes from @Nate_Cohn and his editor @DLeonhardt that insisted that more and more US Latinos were identifying as white?
What the story didn't include is the correspondence I had with @LeoShane and other committee members who were asked specifically about what was said about @PabloReports and what does being "too visible" mean. I will likely share those responses later since it was all on record.
We know that committee members complained about the work of a Latino journalist but they will now deny it.
After just 1 month of getting a temporary pass to cover Congress for @latinorebels, @PabloReports's pass has not been extended. Been working hard with Pablo to get it renewed even to point of having @SpeakerPelosi's office intervene. They actually tried to help. #LatinoRebelsDCC
I am beyond upset because the mostly white Periodical Gallery committee gave us the runaround and also lied to us. I was told in a phone call by the person who helps coordinate the committee that @PabloReports was seen as being "too visible" during his one month of coverage.
Was also told that committee members complained that @PabloReports was there all the time covering Congress and that they didn't expect him to do so much work.
In my latest opinion piece for @PostOpinions, I chronicle the last week of immigration coverage from major US news outlets and why I decided to not publish certain @AP stories at @latinorebels (part o @futuromedia).
In that piece, I found out that the @AP was addressing some of the words used in certain stories. They went on the record with me and also shared an internal memo about their recent decisions regarding immigration stories.
In the interest of informing the public and being fully transparent as a way to inform other editors, this is the internal memo I received from the @AP (4 tweets to follow).
Subject: From the Standards Center: A note about the current increase in border entrances