"The #1619Project does not argue that 1619 is our true founding."
"The 1619 Project is a major initiative observing the 400th anniversary of the beginning of American slavery. It aims to reframe the country’s history, understanding 1619 as our true founding..."
Also, the school curriculum that the @pulitzercenter developed w/ the @nytimes for the 1619 project states: "The 1619 Project... challenges us to reframe U.S. history by marking the year when the first enslaved Africans arrived on Virginia soil as our nation's foundational date."
1619 Project author Jones says she's not saying 1619 *is* the USA's founding date, but "invite[s] the reader/listener to contemplate what it would *mean* to consider 1619 and the beginning of American slavery as our founding." Curious distinction.
The same @washingtonpost article that quotes Hamas-provided casualty numbers without labeling them as such says Israel has not provided "**significant** evidence" that Hamas used a hospital as a base of operations. washingtonpost.com/world/2023/11/…
Also in the article: "The list of injuries the U.N. team witnessed was an indicator of the brutality of an Israeli military campaign..."
It turns out this correction was for the front page story for the Wednesday morning print edition of the @NYTimes and the paragraph with the inaccurate wording appears just above the photo of a ruined building that is not the hospital. static01.nyt.com/images/2023/10…
Here's the Florida Bar profile of the @splcenter attorney Thomas Webb Jurgens arrested this week. An email to the SPLC address listed below did not get bounced back, but another email to a non-existent name did, so seems to confirm it's a legit address. floridabar.org/about/section/…
Here's the rejected email. I did not get a similar reply for an email to the Jurgens address.
Jurgens is not listed on the @splcenter website, however:
After YEARS of publishing on its website that at 5-6 weeks of a pregnancy, "A very basic beating heart and circulatory system develop," Planned Parenthood has decided... it really doesn't. Now: "It sounds like a heartbeat on an ultrasound, but it's not a fully-formed heart..." 1/
The change happened sometime in the past two months (after the Supreme Court's Roe decision.) As of 7/25/22, an archive of the website shows the original wording. The rest of the page remains unchanged and there's no note to indicate the update was made. 2/
The same page still notes that at 7-8 week, "The heart has formed." 3/