Margot Sanger-Katz Profile picture
Sep 18, 2020 9 tweets 4 min read Read on X
The White House and Pharma were *this close* to a deal to lower Medicare drug spending by $150 billion over 10 years. But it blew up because the White House wanted to mail discount cards to Medicare beneficiaries before the election. nytimes.com/2020/09/18/us/… @jmartNYT @maggieNYT
Pharma balked at "Trump cards," which is why the president, for the second time, signed an executive order that says it will lower Medicare drug prices to the lowest price paid by foreign countries. whitehouse.gov/presidential-a…
As you may remember, the president signed such an order in July, too. But the White House never published the order in the Federal Register, as required by law. nytimes.com/2020/08/24/us/…
That order finally became public on Sunday, along with the. new one. But the new one somehow rescinds the previously unpublished order. (Here it is: whitehouse.gov/presidential-a…)
It is true that the pharmaceutical industry loathes the approach taken by this order, which would establish price controls--with low prices--for drugs purchased for Medicare beneficiaries. But the order itself is a long way from actually affecting drug prices paid by anyone.
Part of the order, which seeks to influence the prices paid for Medicare Part D drugs, seems legally vulnerable. The legislation establishing the program specifically bars the federal government from negotiating directly with the manufacturers. nytimes.com/2019/07/05/ups…
Lawsuits seem inevitable.

But aside from legal challenges, these programs will need to be designed through notice and comment rulemaking, and as pilot programs before they will go Medicare-wide. Look at the careful language here for a preview of what regulators will face.
All of which is to say: Drug prices are not going down before the election.

But it appears that Pharma was willing to make a deal that would have handed both sides a win right away. nytimes.com/2020/09/18/us/…
One final thought. I know many of these budget numbers sound like monopoly money. But $150 billion is a huge number.

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Margot Sanger-Katz

Margot Sanger-Katz Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @sangerkatz

Sep 30
The Harris campaign is out today with a paper warning about what would happen if Trump repeals Obamacare. kamalaharris.com/wp-content/upl…
Also, today, I published a story about what would happen to subsidies for about $20 million people if the next president and Congress simply do nothing. nytimes.com/2024/09/30/ups…
The subsidies have brought down the price of insurance substantially--making it free for many low income families, and offering financial help to higher earners who got no assistance from Obamacare initially. But they will expire after next year without action.
Read 9 tweets
Sep 5, 2023
Medicare slowth: still going. One of the great (fortunate) mysteries of our time. @aliciaparlap @jshkatznytimes.com/interactive/20…
@aliciaparlap @jshkatz First of all, credit to @ddiamond for coining the term "slowth," to mean slow growth.
@aliciaparlap @jshkatz @ddiamond Medicare has been a budget buster for so long that a lot of smart people have found the program's recent trend of slow growth surprising.
Read 19 tweets
May 12, 2023
When I was reporting on this story about the fiscal impacts of the GOP debt ceiling bill, I stumbled upon a provision that was getting very little attention but would be hugely consequential. nytimes.com/interactive/20…
The provision is called the REINS Act, and is designed to get Congress more engaged in the details of how laws they pass get implemented--by forcing Congress to vote every major regulation up or down. nytimes.com/2023/05/12/ups…
I started calling regulatory policy experts. Almost none of them knew this policy had just passed the House. nytimes.com/2023/05/12/ups…
Read 14 tweets
Apr 13, 2023
Be sure to read @atmccann on the growing abortion pill underground, full of incredible details and never-before-collected data. nytimes.com/interactive/20…
This channel has provided 50,000 pill packs to women since the Dobbs decision. Image
For context, @clairecm and I wrote about data suggesting that the number of legal abortions during this period fell by around 32,000. nytimes.com/2023/04/12/ups…
Read 5 tweets
Mar 22, 2023
A technical Medicare Advantage model change, buried deep in the annual rate notice, has unleashed a lobbying frenzy. nytimes.com/2023/03/22/hea… @ReedAbelson
There is tons of evidence that insurers in the program have been manipulating a program that pays them extra fees for enrolling customers with more illnesses. The change took away payments for some of diagnoses that are gamed the most.
@ReedAbelson and I wrote last year about how nearly every major player in Medicare Advantage is facing a federal fraud lawsuit for this type of behavior. nytimes.com/2022/10/08/ups…
Read 28 tweets
Mar 6, 2023
Republicans in the House have been talking about balancing the budget. Since budget season kicks off this week, @aliciaparlap @jshkatz and I took a look at what that would take. nytimes.com/interactive/20…
First of all, balancing the budget in a decade would be hard. It would involve reducing spending and/or raising revenue by $16 trillion. That's around a quarter of federal spending.
The chart above is just an illustration. Almost no one recommends balancing the budget by just cutting everything in the budget by a quarter.
Read 16 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us!

:(