First: This isn't just a ban from using App Stores, but from using US networks entirely—and it's untenable. Code is itself speech. Banning Americans from using TikTok and WeChat would violate their own First Amendment rights.
Second: Trump says he’s banning the apps due to national security concerns. While there are genuine security concerns with WeChat and TikTok, this ban does not solve them. Worse, blocking app store security updates makes them less secure.
Third: This ban would set a very dangerous precedent. Imagine this ban, except for any encrypted apps that don't include backdoors for government snoops.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Each time you see a targeted ad, your personal data has just been exposed to thousands of advertisers and data brokers through a process called “real-time bidding” (RTB).
This process does more than deliver ads — it lets data brokers harvest and monetize your online activity, which fuels government surveillance, and even poses national security risks. 🧵(1/8)
What’s real-time bidding (RTB)? It’s the process used to select the targeted ads shown to you on nearly every site and app you visit.
Those ads are the winners of milliseconds-long auctions that expose your personal info to thousands of companies a day.
The auction starts by sending thousands of potential advertisers your personal data, including your unique advertising ID, location, IP address, and demographic information. Advertisers use that information to decide whether or not to bid.
While only one advertiser wins the auction, all advertisers can keep your personal data. (2/8)
Essentially, anyone posing as an ad buyer can access a stream of sensitive data about the billions of individuals using sites or apps with targeted ads.
This is a big way that data brokers get a hold of personal data that they then sell to basically anyone willing to pay. (3/8)
In the wake of the 2024 election in the U.S., many people are concerned about their digital privacy. EFF has decades of experience in providing digital privacy and security resources, particularly for vulnerable people. We’ve written a lot of resources over the years and here are the top ten that we think are most useful right now 🧵(1/13)
Our Surveillance Self-Defense guides are a great place to start your journey of securing yourself against digital threats. We know that it can be a bit overwhelming, so we recommend starting with our guide on making a security plan so you can familiarize yourself with the basics and decide on your specific needs. (2/13)ssd.eff.org
If you are creating your security plan for the first time, it’s helpful to know which technologies might realistically be used to spy on you. Our Street-Level Surveillance team has spent years studying the technologies that law enforcement uses and has made this handy website where you can find information about technologies including drones, face recognition, license plate readers, stingrays, and more. sls.eff.org (3/13)
"If the government is really concerned ... it should look at data privacy more broadly & enact more comprehensive data-privacy regulation that would restrict how all companies, not just TikTok, collect & retain & use user data.” - @DavidGreene in @GridNewsgrid.news/story/technolo…
Each TikTok user “does their own threat modeling; they can determine to what extent, if they have enough knowledge about how their data is used, whether the threat that using the app poses is something that’s acceptable for them."-@DavidGreene in @GridNewsgrid.news/story/technolo…
It's Sunshine Week, and that means The Foilies, EFF and @MuckRock's annual faux awards for agencies that behave badly when confronted with public records requests. The winners are… eff.org/deeplinks/2023…
The Federal Bureau of Investigation for dragging its feet in providing records on how it was keeping tabs on The Monkees. eff.org/deeplinks/2023…
The National Security Agency for being transparent about the thousands of times it could neither confirm nor deny it had information requested by a member of the public. eff.org/deeplinks/2023…
Victory! The security expert @olabini was finally declared innocent yesterday in a unanimous verdict by a three-judge tribunal in Ecuador. 1/ peoplesdispatch.org/2023/02/01/dig…
@olabini Since his 70-day arbitrary detention in 2019, Ola Bini’s case has been impacted by numerous due process violations and human rights concerns. It went through suspensions or delays at nearly every stage of his trial. 2/ eff.org/deeplinks/2023…
@olabini He faced unfounded accusations based on misunderstandings of technology, which disregarded the vital role of security experts and secure technology to safeguard everyone’s rights and security. 3/ eff.org/deeplinks/2021…
El Martes 31 de enero se reinstala la audiencia de juicio de @olabini. Estamos pendientes y esperando que la corte de un ejemplo de transparencia y ajustado a los criterios técnicos y legales.
@eff Nos preocupa que un único día de audiencia no baste para terminar un juicio ya lleno de retrasos e irregularidades eff.org/es/deeplinks/2…
@eff Este proceso y la necesidad de decisiones ajustadas a criterios técnicos y legales son vitales para los derechos digitales en Ecuador.