“Are these peasants seriously going to eat all the sweet potatoes?”
A distinctive feature of communist operations in Chinese Civil War by 1948 was that novel, large-scale conventional-scale military operations were combined with mass mobilization and conscription of civilians /1
for logistic support—the latter referred to as “People’s War” in Mao Zedong’s parlance.
Before the outbreak of the Huaihai Campaign, Captain Guo, a company commander in 100th Army, 7th Corps, Republic of China Army, was conducting an inspection of civilian houses in a village. /2
In one dwelling, pulling back a cloth curtain, he stumbled upon a room chock-full of sweet potatoes, covering the entire floor.
He promptly reported the suspicious finding to his superior officers.
They scratched their heads. “These peasants in Shandong province, they all eat /3
sweet potatoes.“ Captain Guo was instructed to do nothing.
Idiots, he reflected many decades after the war: his superiors simply didn’t understand the psychology of how communists had operated.
Nor did most of the Republic of China Army understand, to their own detriment. /end
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
A reason why East Asian culture traditionally highly prizes education, is because in 19th century to early 20th century East Asian society, education was a prized skill asset in short societal supply. If you were highly educated, not only could you sit for imperial examinations
to embark upon a professional career of high prestige, power, and material comfort and wealth, but your literacy was also a practically marketable skill by itself in your community. The masses of your illiterate community neighbors could hire you to write letters or petitions on
their behalf, or write decorative banners for them, or read things to them. If you're an enlisted soldier with literary skills, you would be catapulted to a privileged position in your army unit's headquarters staff to help write and read dispatched military messages. Education
Using Kash Patel as FBI director is a prime example of the tactics and methods of populist revolution as intra-elite competition. Kash Patel, a professionally failed lawyer from a mediocre law school and unable to break into ranks of partnership-track of elite law firms, probably
privately harbors intense personal feelings of professional failure and envious resentment of his more successful fellow multi-millionaire lawyers at elite law firm partnerships who are the embodiment of the “establishment elite”. In other words, Kash Patel is a “loser” elite
whose intra-elite competitive incentives to smash and wreck vengeance against “winner” establishment elites would be particularly strong and ripe for harvesting by Trump regime. I’ve previously outlined on this website why a strongman supreme leader, such as Trump, prefers weak
for Hodgkin lymphoma, which had been one of the deadliest human diseases but the story of which had been completely and utterly transformed by Dr. Henry Kaplan’s pioneering work.
Dr. Henry Kaplan brought immense professional fame and accolades to himself and his organization,
Stanford Hospital and Stanford University School of Medicine.
But things for Dr. Henry Kaplan did not take the trajectory of unlimited rocket-ship ascent that you’d expect for a man as utterly accomplished and successful as him.
Part of Vietnamese communism's veneration of Ho Chi Minh was the idea and myth that he was a lifelong celibate revolutionary, that he was involuntarily celibate owing to the necessary workmanlike toil on the sacred revolutionary path. But in fact, Ho Chi Minh did have a Cantonese
wife during his revolutionary career, although he soon abandoned her for furtherance of his revolutionary path. It can also be surmised that Ho Chi Minh probably had a conflicted and wistful attitude towards his involuntarily celibate status later on as a senior communist leader,
with his evident and visible thirst for companionship of female attendants famous among another foreign country's communist leaders and organizers receiving his frequent visitations to that foreign country. Why does Vietnamese communism actively deny and cover up Ho Chi Minh's
Authoritarian ideologies that are the most effective at mass-mobilizing popular support are equivalent to secular religions. A religion can be a church, or a cult (although the two are definitely not mutually exclusive). A church is characterized by organizational discipline—
Party discipline, military discipline, thought discipline, behavioral discipline, all become core to the soul of the revolutionary movement and authoritarian regime ideology. A cult is characterized by irrational, devotional belief—the Party’s Supreme Leader being a living god,
a secular revolutionary equivalent of a Shinto national religion with the earth revolving around Emperor as the sun beaming off brilliant rays at the gravitational orbital center. A revolutionary movement can have elements of both church and cult—church’s ruthless organizational
JD Vance rightfully earned his place as Trump's right-hand man and Vice President, because of his outstanding abilities, high intelligence, and public renown. Yet, exactly because of those same qualities, he is also a long-term threat to Trump's personal and familial dynastic
hold on power, a long-term strategic challenge to the orderly succession and continuity of power, privilege, and influence, from Trump to his familial dynastic successors. Whether Trump understands that he has truly invited a potential monster into his personal closet, or whether
he got giddy and enthused over JD Vance's impeccable credentials and energy like an American businessman roleplaying (cosplaying) an authoritarian dictator that he Trump is, isn't clear, although my suspicions lean towards the latter possibility. Furthermore, it is also precisely