@pcmasuzzo I think the more important roles of the #openscience "leaders" right now is being vocal about what things are now being sold as "openscience" but are not. (but searching myself too!)
https://twitter.com/pcmasuzzo/status/1307244203316064258
maybe to give some examples: "open access" to COVID19 articles that cannot be redistributed by others --> not #openscience
web scraping content from a website that did not have any license statement --> not #openscience
"data available on request" --> not #openscience
(paying) article processing costs --> it's not even not #openscience, but certainly not #openscience
a hybrid journal --> not #openscience
FAIR data --> not #openscience
EC H2020 Open Data Pilot --> not #openscience
a big publisher with a few CC-BY journals but no intention to flip their flagship journals (or hiding behind a "first..." --> not #openscience
preprints that cannot be reshared --> not #openscience
most MOOCs --> not #openscience
not citing an #openscience resource --> not even not #openscience, but outright violating academic values: you cite your sources
https://twitter.com/astrochunly/status/1307049679994212356
dropping a paywalled paper on ResearchGate --> not #openscience
a paywalled paper that you can read with ReadCube --> not #openscience
a .tar.gz in Supplementary Info without a copyright/license statement --> not #openscience
@threadreaderapp unroll
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
