Those of you waking up this morning to a war for the soul of the American judiciary have not been paying attention. This war began decades ago with right wing donors began actively seeking to remake the courts. They made the choice to place ideology over principle then.
McConnell long ago tossed tradition and fairness aside. The embrace of a corrupt unfit traitorous president was the clearest sign of this. So long as he gave them judges all his other flaws would be accepted. Look at the struggle of McGahn in the WH for further evidence of this.
He knew Trump was violating the law and that it put him at personal risk. Yet he kept on his role because he felt appointing Supreme Court justices was worth the risk. (See Michael Schmidt's book for this story, well told.)
The case of Merrick Garland and the eventual nomination of Gorsuch to fill the Scalia slot illustrates this. The curious timing of the Kennedy departure and the Kavanaugh battle illustrates this. The fact that the Senate has been approving judges recently when they could not...
...bring themselves to assist the tens of millions of Americans suffering in this dual public health-economic crisis illustrates this. The speed with which Trump and McConnell committed to filling Ruth Bader Ginsburg's seat--acting just hours after her death--illustrates this.
The GOP long ago recognized that the most important judicial appointments are for life. They have prioritized justices and judges who share their political views over those who have even a modicum of competence. Ideology above all else has been their North Star.
Meanwhile, Democrats have howled and moralized and lamented and lost battle after battle. Because Democrats have played by the old rules and because repeatedly they have been outmaneuvered politically. While Democrats decry the GOP as being "unfair" or "hypocritical"...
McConnell and the Federalist Society laugh up their sleeves. They are winning. They have been winning for years. In some ways, it is already too late to do anything about it on critical issues--those that will be decided by the current eight person court--issues like ACA...
...and perhaps issues that have to do with challenges that may emerge related to the upcoming election. (Remember Bush v. Gore. As I said, the GOP has been playing this game better than the Democrats for years and with devastating consequences.)
Now, the Dems need to shift their tactics. The only way to defeat a scorched earth opponent is w/scorched earth counter-measures. First, they must make it clear that they will mobilize vast resources to defeat GOPers who support a vote for RBG's replacement before inauguration.
And they must do that. They must take back the Senate. Vast monies poured into Dem coffers last night after the announcement of RBG's death, if you can help ensure that continues, you must. Dems must focus on the seats they can win.
Naturally, Dems must also win back the presidency. If either of these efforts falls short, the GOP will consolidate past victories and a generation will face a corrupted, debased, court system that is deeply biased and threatens vital personal liberties and our democracy itself.
Every tactic possible to delay the RBG replacement vote must be embraced. And the message must be sent unmistakably, if the GOP forges ahead with the effort to install another Trump justice before January 20, then the Dem response will be unsparing.
The filibuster will be (as it should be in any case) set aside. But stacking the Supreme Court and the lower levels of the federal judiciary should be on the table. It seems striking but the number of justices on the Supreme Court or elsewhere within our system is mentioned...
...nowhere in the Constitution. An effective, fair, balanced, above all else just system is what is required. Numbers of seats on courts is secondary.
Dems have been ineffective, wringing their hands, clutching their pearls, for too long.
While the GOP has been fighting a war, we have been playing at some high school game of Model Congress. Enough. Too many great issues are at stake. Voting rights. A woman's right to choose. Combatting climate change. Ensuring other civil rights.
Without an effective court system, imagine what a corrupt President like Trump and a dangerous Attorney General like Bill Barr can get away with. They will place themselves above the law. They will make a mockery of our democracy. And once gone, it will be lost forever.
We are presented with the same questions that the confronted the founders. Will we tolerate leaders who place themselves beyond the reach of justice? Will we tolerate a system that empowers the few? Will we invite tyranny back to these shores?
This is no longer an abstraction. We are starting well behind. We have lost some of the critical battles in a war against us all in which we have failed to engage. Now, there is no margin for error. We must not fail in any of the key challenges before us.
McConnell and the GOP must be stopped. The dark money from the coffers of the right cannot be allowed to dictate the demise of our system via the gutting of its values. This morning we must turn our grief at the loss of a true hero like Ruth Bader Ginsburg into something more.
We must see her, one of the great fighters in our history for justice, a champion of the ideals of democracy, as an inspiration and we must fight as she did throughout her career, against the odds, with a clear focus on the outcome that can preserve, restore & elevate our system.
We must begin now. There is no time to lose and a country and system we cherish at stake.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Every single time you engage in the delusion that Trump has a "policy position" on traditional issues you normalize him. Trump has no beliefs, no traditional policy views. For him, policies are like his blue suit & dumb long red ties, a costume he wears to hide who he really is.
He is a terrorist calling himself a freedom fighter. This election is not about his tax policy versus that of Kamala Harris, even if he has proposals in that area. It is about the fact that he is a criminal, a traitor, a fraudster, a liar, the worst president in our history...
...a terrible human being who seeks to reward himself & his friends at the expense of everyone else. Everything he does is first and foremost about what is in it for him and occasionally for his supporters (because he needs to pay them off to get what he wants for himself.)
Given the number of ways that a candidate can communicate directly with voters--the relevance and wisdom of doing so through intermediaries who will filter the news and who often will bend it to suit other agendas has diminished. That seems reasonable to me.
The argument that the press is the objective presenter of facts has been weakened as virtually all media seek to adjust their presentation of content to suit business or political objectives. There are fewer and fewer journalists who can be relied upon to seek objective truth.
Too many are compromised not only by the agenda of their company's owners but by their own history of access journalism or sensationalism or focusing on the trending rather than the important story. They howl at being ignored or bypassed. But they share some of the blame.
The argument that Harris is somehow not speaking enough to the press is ridiculous on several levels: 1.) She actually does speak to the press, 2.) She has been visible constantly since she became the candidate, 3.) She has been clear and detailed about all her policy goals.
4.) She has been readily available to the press for four years. There are few questions about her that have not already been asked and answered. 5.) The goal of the campaign is for her to communicate with voters. So far, they seem to have responded well to what she has said.
6.) Her opponent is actually not campaigning, is primarily speaking to patsies in the press when he does speak to the media, and lies constantly so it doesn't matter what he is asked because he won't answer truthfully.
Folks, if you want a US policy toward Israel and Gaza that is more focused on relieving the suffering the people of Gaza and achieving a lasting, just peace, disrupting the campaign of the one person most likely to deliver that is a bad idea. Especially when...
...she has indicated a willingness to meet with groups that share your views. She may not agree with all of your ideas and suggestions. But she is by far your best and only legitimate hope of change and weakening her is a crazily self-destructive process.
You may not like this reality. But you would like the alternatives--Trump or the status quo--much much much less. You may not feel you can wait for our political processes to work out...but frankly, there is no alternative choice that is available or possible.
To all the geniuses who feel Harris should have picked Shapiro to "win Pennsylvania" I ask, um, when was the last time that was the reason a VP was picked? (Hint: It is seldom if ever the reason a VP candidate was picked.)
Here, let me do some quick math for you. Biden certainly didn't pick Harris to win a contested state. Trump picked neither Vance nor Pence to win contested states. HRC picked Tim Kaine to help in Va., that's true, and he helped. It was an outlier.
Do you think McCain picked Palin to win Alaska? Edwards did not help Kerry win North Carolina. Did Cheney get picked to help Bush in Montana? No. How about Lieberman to help Gore in Connecticut. No. Clinton did win Al Gore's home state of Tennessee...
The recent discussion about Biden has gone through phases. The first was about the debate performance. The second was about whether that was a signal of potential problems to come. But we are now in a third phase which turns more fears about the state of the campaign.
These concerns are largely from political professionals (not commentators). They turn not just on setbacks since the debate but on the fact that the campaign was seemingly spinning its wheels even beforehand. I sense a bunch of it is from worried folks down the ballot.
These conversations seem to be continuing despite Biden's repeated statements that he is definitely running and in it for the long haul and have not been helped by recent polling data, the Cook Report downgrade of Dem battleground prospects, etc.