Timothy Isaiah Cho Profile picture
Sep 19, 2020 4 tweets 1 min read Read on X
Did you know John Winthrop, a leader of the Massachusetts Bay Colony whose "A Model of Christian Charity" set forth the puritan colonists' vision of establishing a "city on a hill," was not only a slaveowner but helped to write the first law in North America legalizing slavery?
Not only that, but the Massachusetts Bay Colony often traded Native American prisoners for enslaved Africans as a way to "get rid of troublesome" Pequot Indians.

Within a few decades of the passing of the first law legalizing slavery, the Colony passed a law stating that the
children of enslaved people inherited bondage.

Yes, the language and vision of a "city on a hill" and "a model for Christian Charity" were used in the same breath as creating systems and institutions of heinous injustice, even the first of their kind in North American. American
puritanism, among many things, was a trailblazer for the creation of laws protecting the practice of slavery.

One source among many: historyofmassachusetts.org/slavery-in-mas…

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Timothy Isaiah Cho

Timothy Isaiah Cho Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @tisaiahcho

Mar 1
This is the game that they love to play - they claim to have some secret set of information that only they know that completely acquits the abuser no matter how guilty they appear to be, but they won't release that secret set of information.

Columbus Metro Presbytery would not release the minutes of our church's session minutes during the time that they had a committee sit in to (purportedly) bring extra accountability after our pastor got caught in his sin. They also refused to release their report and
recommendations. The only way that one of the members of our church was able to even see these was because he kept following up with them for MONTHS until he was granted a time to see them in person while being monitored by a representative of presbytery. In fact, it *should have
Read 9 tweets
Feb 24
I was stopped in my tracks when I read this quote.

“'The unborn' are a convenient group of people to advocate for. They never make demands of you; they are morally uncomplicated, unlike the incarcerated, addicted, or the chronically poor; they don’t resent your condescension or
complain that you are not politically correct; unlike widows, they don’t ask you to question patriarchy; unlike orphans, they don’t need money, education, or childcare; unlike aliens, they don’t bring all that racial, cultural, and religious baggage that you dislike; they allow
you to feel good about yourself without any work at creating or maintaining relationships; and when they are born, you can forget about them, because they cease to be unborn. You can love the unborn and advocate for them without substantially challenging your own wealth, power,
Read 5 tweets
Feb 18
I've noticed that there are generally three progressive levels of complementarianism. The first is ministerial complementarianism, where women are only barred from ordained offices. The second is familial complementarianism, where, in addition to the constraints of ministerial
complementarianism, women are barred from certain types of roles within their household. The third is societal complementarianism, where, in addition to the constraints of the first two types, women are barred from certain types of roles within society at large.
Even though I disagree with it, very, very rarely have I even seen a church hold strictly to just ministerial complementarianism. It's often a very quick slide from ministerial complementarianism to familial complementarianism and then again to societal complementarianism.
Read 7 tweets
Feb 10
In Christian circles, the expression of anger is often connected to power. There are those who are afforded the right to express their anger freely and to have righteousness be attributed to it. There are others who are never allowed to express anger.

Those who can freely
express their anger also receive a wide range of grace, so that an instance of unrighteous anger is tucked away under righteous intent or ends. Those who are never allowed to express their anger are given no grace, so that anytime they step out of line, they lose all rapport.
Those who can express anger are rewarded for being "passionate" and "living out convictions." Others are rewarded for repressing their anger, being told that it's glorifying to God to be a doormat.

Expressions of anger, as they are connected to power, are necessarily connected
Read 5 tweets
Jan 11
What I learned from my time in the PCA is that it's not so much that leaders *can't* do something about abusive peers or that they are *unable* to do it quickly. It's rather that they choose to neither do as much as they can nor push to do it as quickly as possible.
There are plenty of leaders in the PCA who know about our church's story and who know our former pastor. They've reached out privately with their sympathy and sorrow. But they have not done anything substantive or public to bring about justice to our situation.
Many of these pastors are mutual friends of our former pastor and mine, and/or we rubbed shoulders in the Beautiful Orthodoxy/National Partnership circles. Y'all talked a big game about combating the abuse and racism in the conservative, Gospel Reformation Network, and similar
Read 8 tweets
Jan 11
Weaponizing words of grace is a common tactic of spiritual abuse. Examples include:

1) forced forgiveness.
2) "we're all sinners"/"if you looked deep in your own heart, you'd see that you're that bad too."
3) "he/she has repented enough already."
4) labelling a whistleblower
or advocate as simply adversarial (e.g. "bitter," an "enemy of the church/ministry," a "cynic," etc).
5) "the peace and purity of the church" as a method of silencing.
6) "no church is perfect"
7) "love covers a multitude of sins"
8) "did you talk to him/her privately first?"
9) "we can't just take one person's accusation"/"we need two or more witnesses"
10) "leaders are worthy of double honor"

In the context of unequal power dynamics, words of grace can become dangerous weapons that destroy souls. Every Christian should learn how to spot these
Read 4 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us!

:(